
This article was originally published by Common Edge as "The Politics of Architecture Are Not a Matter of Taste."
Late last month Current Affairs published an essay by Brianna Rennix and Nathan J. Robinson titled “Why You Hate Contemporary Architecture: And if you don’t, why you should.” The piece, written in a pseudo-funny Internet lexicon wherein all objects of criticism are “garbage,” is so laden with irony—the poorest of substitutes for analysis—that it is difficult to discern a core argument. Still, I’d like to question the central premise of the piece: that what the authors term “contemporary architecture” is ugly and oppressive, and that liking it is nothing shy of immoral.

.jpg?1511296287&format=webp&width=640&height=580)

.jpg?1511197306&format=webp&width=640&height=580)
.jpg?1511278123)
.jpg?1511197306)
.jpg?1511265934&format=webp&width=640&height=580)
.jpg?1511265934)



















