
Are tree covered buildings really in tune with ecological and sustainable principles, or are they just a form of greenwashing? This is the question posed by Kurt Kohlstedt in his essay, Renderings vs. Reality: The Improbable Rise of Tree-Covered Skyscrapers, for 99% Invisible. The author notes that vegetated designs come about for myriad reasons – the appearance of sustainability, better air and views, investment intrigue – but that most of these concepts will never leave the realm of paper or virtual architecture. For as many reasons that these buildings have become popular, there are detractors for why they simply cannot be built, including daunting construction hurdles (extra concrete and steel), vast irrigation systems, added wind load complexities, and the trees themselves having difficulty adapting to their vertiginous conditions.


.jpg?1464426374)
.jpg?1464397199&format=webp&width=640&height=580)
.jpg?1464397199)
.jpg?1464648970&format=webp&width=640&height=580)
.jpg?1464648970)

.jpg?1464533643)
.jpg?1464398906)




.jpg?1464435092)
.jpg?1464428401&format=webp&width=640&height=580)
.jpg?1464428401)

