the world's most visited architecture website
i

Sign up now and start saving and organizing your favorite architecture projects and photos

Sign up now to save and organize your favorite architecture projects

i

Find the most inspiring products for your projects in our Product Catalog.

Find the most inspiring products in our Product Catalog.

i

Get the ArchDaily Chrome Extension and be inspired with every new tab. Install here »

i

All over the world, architects are finding cool ways to re-use run-down old buildings. Click here to see the best in Refurbishment Architecture.

Want to see the coolest refurbishment projects? Click here.

i

Immerse yourself in inspiring buildings with our selection of 360 videos. Click here.

See our immersive, inspiring 360 videos. Click here.

All
Projects
Products
Events
Competitions
Navigate articles using your keyboard
  1. ArchDaily
  2. News
  3. Does London's Planning System Lack Civic Representation?

Does London's Planning System Lack Civic Representation?

Does London's Planning System Lack Civic Representation?
Does London's Planning System Lack Civic Representation?, London's skyline is set to be dramatically altered by tall buildings in the near future. Image Courtesy of CPAT / Hayes Davidson / Jason Hawkes
London's skyline is set to be dramatically altered by tall buildings in the near future. Image Courtesy of CPAT / Hayes Davidson / Jason Hawkes

A debate organized by New London Architecture (NLA) has revealed a strong need for civic societies in London which protect the interests of the public in planning decisions, offering New York as a potential model. The debate, which was one of the headline events at the London Festival of Architecture, was organized in response to a study which showed over 200 tall buildings were currently in the pipeline for the UK's capital, which sparked fears that the current planning system was not fit for the purpose of controlling development in the city.

More on the debate after the break

Ben Rogers, director of think tank Centre for London, said "We have failed to create an effective civic organisation in London that can monitor events in the built environment and contribute to debates about it.

"If we had such an organisation I wonder if we would have been aware of the rapidly changing nature of the skyline and the extraordinary transformation that’s coming."

He compared this situation to the system in New York, where membership organizations such as the Municipal Arts Society put their $5 million budget towards representing the public in planning decisions.

Head of New London Architecture Peter Murray agreed with this comment, adding that he was part of an attempt to revive the London Society, which was founded in 1912 by Edwin Lutyens and will hopefully provide "just that civic voice".

The argument made by the panel adds to London's recent envy of the New York planning system, after earlier this year Terry Farrell's review of UK architecture proposed a switch from the UK's current, reactive planning system to the more proactive system of zoning used in the United States.

Story via BD Online

About this author
Rory Stott
Author
Cite: Rory Stott. "Does London's Planning System Lack Civic Representation?" 04 Jun 2014. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/512993/does-london-s-planning-system-lack-civic-representation/> ISSN 0719-8884