Material intelligence refers to how materials perform, adapt, and interact with ecological and cultural systems. It considers how stone, steel, or timber respond to intertangled forces, how those materials are sourced and assembled, and how they persist after demolition. Designers are centering material intelligence in constructing our cities in a generation of environmental uncertainty and strained supply chains.
Few materials embody this shift as vividly as cross-laminated timber (CLT). By layering and bonding planks into structural panels, CLT offers strength, fire resistance, and a significantly lower carbon footprint than concrete or steel. Across Europe and Canada, mass timber has emerged as a centerpiece of decarbonized construction. Yet in the United States, progress has moved more slowly. Developers hesitate. Codes trail behind innovation. Conventional materials still dominate the urban skyline.
One region is taking the lead in the United States. The forests, urban cores, and construction sites of the Pacific Northwest are modeling a different framework for construction with timber.
How the United States is Trailing Behind
Around the world, CLT is not widely considered a novel, emerging framework for construction. Countries like Austria and Norway understand timber as standard practice for mid-rise and high-rise construction. Japan has adopted mass timber as part of a cultural shift toward using natural materials, even in densely urbanized corridors. In Canada, cities like Vancouver and Toronto have incorporated it into their climate action plans and public procurement, considering the extreme climate conditions of northern winters.
Despite its vast forests and cutting-edge research institutions, the United States noticeably falls behind in practicing and celebrating CLT and circular economy research. National building codes have only recently begun recognizing mass timber, albeit with strict restrictions. Insurance markets continue to remain skeptical of challenges in construction and maintenance. A lack of industrial-scale manufacturing has further slowed momentum.
The challenge is not a lack of potential but a lack of systems. The United States has the raw resources, academic support, and urgent low-carbon construction needs. What it lacks is coordination, policy ambition, and cultural commitment.
Advantages in the Pacific Northwest
The Pacific Northwest stands apart from the United States as a whole. Thanks to its mild winters and seasons of heavy rainfall, the region holds some of the country's most abundant and renewable timber reserves. The climate in these states encourages rapid tree growth and supports incredible biodiversity. The coastal mountains protect forest ecosystems from extreme weather events like hurricanes or tornadoes.
Secondly, the Pacific Northwest region is home to critical infrastructure for innovation. Universities in Oregon and Washington are advancing seismic testing, structural performance, and digital fabrication to advance creative technologies in construction and fabrication. Designers have embraced biogenic materials for aesthetics and to respond to climate urgency. Public interest in green building is rising, and policymakers are listening.
These positions place the Pacific Northwest as a testbed for completely reimagining how materials, cities, and policy can work together in a circular economy. The region has forests, the technical expertise, and a willing public to embrace urban innovations.
Policy Catalysts for Timber Construction
This transformation did not happen by accident. It required bold regulatory action and strategic public investment. In 2018, Oregon became the first state in the United States to approve high-rise mass timber buildings, specifically those that exceed the traditional six-story limit. This code addendum was accomplished through the Statewide Alternate Method (SAM) process, allowing code exceptions based on performance criteria. The move positioned Oregon ahead of national codes and sent a clear message: mass timber was not only viable, it was essential.
Legislators bridged multiple agendas to connect city and state climate goals with forest management. In Oregon, the Forest to Frame initiative linked investments in forest restoration and wildfire resilience with CLT technology. By treating sustainable forestry and innovation as parts of the same system, the state helped rural economies shift toward higher-value, lower-impact timber practices.
Local governments advanced the cause through public competitions and state-funded pilot projects. The USDA's Tall Wood Building Prize, which included Oregon-based projects among its winners, gave visibility to mass timber design and helped validate its structural performance in urban contexts. Similarly, the unbuilt Portland Framework building would have been a landmark project that received over $1.5 million in funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to demonstrate the viability of a 12-story timber tower.
Building codes are beginning to follow suit in this region. Both Oregon and Washington have adopted provisions from the 2021 update of the International Building Code ahead of schedule, allowing for taller mass timber construction and streamlining the approval process for architects and developers.
Circular Thinking in Practice
The growing popularity of Cross-Laminated Timber has surged for good reason. CLT is attractive to sustainable designers because of its regional sourcing, low carbon footprint, and ease of prefabrication. However, like any material, its impact depends entirely on the design and implementation. Timber's potential lies not in the panels themselves, but in the layered systems that support them.
Sustainability is not just about swapping out concrete for CLT. It is a layered, interdisciplinary challenge that requires architects, engineers, ecologists, and policymakers to work in sync. It demands attention to assembling a building and how it will be taken apart, eventually. In the Pacific Northwest, this consideration of construction is gaining momentum. Architects are embracing circular construction logics, treating CLT construction techniques as a flexible, reusable component within a longer material lifecycle. Buildings are designed as adaptable systems constructed with reversible joints, standardized modules, and demountable panels.
This is the essence of design for disassembly: the idea that intelligent construction anticipates change. It recognizes that buildings evolve, and that sustainable design must plan for those evolutions from the start. CLT supports this approach in ways that traditional materials often cannot. Its precision fabrication, structural integrity, and light weight allow for ease of movement and reuse. Unlike concrete, which is poured and permanent, or steel, which often requires energy-intensive reprocessing, CLT can circulate through a building's life and beyond.
If CLT is to succeed as a regenerative material, it must be embedded in a broader framework that values flexibility, foresight, and the long-term stewardship of materials. The Pacific Northwest has the raw material and design momentum. It stands as an impressive precedent for the entire United States.
Defining Stewardship in Timber Innovation
There is a risk that timber will become the next symbol of sustainable branding, marketed as carbon-neutral while concealing its extractive practices or inequitable land use. Material intelligence means valuing timber as a system of relationships, in addition to its structural qualities. It means designing with the whole lifecycle and considering the material choices' social, ecological, and cultural implications.
The Pacific Northwest uses timber to rethink how architecture functions in culture, ecology, and policy. This region is building more than structures. It is creating a model. That model places material intelligence at the center. It ties together forests and cities, labor and climate, innovation and regulation. It shows how circularity can become construction logic, not just a sustainability slogan.
If the Pacific Northwest succeeds, it will not be because it found the perfect material. It will be because it learned how to use it with wisdom, care, and collective intent.
This article is part of the ArchDaily Topics: What Is Future Intelligence?, proudly presented by Gendo, an AI co-pilot for Architects.
Our mission at Gendo is to help architects produce concept images 100X faster by focusing on the core of the design process. We have built a cutting edge AI tool in collaboration with architects from some of the most renowned firms such as Zaha Hadid, KPF and David Chipperfield.
Every month we explore a topic in-depth through articles, interviews, news, and architecture projects. We invite you to learn more about our ArchDaily Topics. And, as always, at ArchDaily we welcome the contributions of our readers; if you want to submit an article or project, contact us.
