We are currently in Beta version and updating this search on a regular basis. We’d love to hear your feedback here.

Jens Lindhe


Can Green Roofs Make Our Cities Better?

Researchers credit the Hanging Gardens of Babylon as the first examples of green roofs. Although there is no proof of its exact location and very little literature on the structure, the most accepted theory is that King Nebuchadnezzar II built a series of elevated, ascending terraces with varied species as a gift to his wife, who missed the forests and mountains of Persia, their local land. According to Wolf Schneider [1] the gardens were supported by brick vaults, and under them, there were shaded halls cooled by artificial irrigation of the gardens, with a much milder temperature than the outside, in the plains of Mesopotamia (present-day Iraq). Since then, examples of green roofs have appeared all over the world, from Rome to Scandinavia, in the most diverse climates and types.

Nevertheless, inserting plants on roofs is still viewed with suspicion by many, as they are thought to be costly and difficult to maintain. Others, however, argue that the high implementation costs are quickly offset with savings in air conditioning and especially that occupying the building's fifth façade with vegetation is, above all, a rational solution. In any case, the question remains as to how green roofs can really help with climate change.

Architecture Doesn’t Need Rebuilding, It Needs More Thoughtful Critics

In the last few weeks, a number of reactionary architectural commentators have come out of the woodwork to denounce what they see as the currently negative direction of contemporary architecture. They claim that architecture needs to be “rebuilt” or that it is “imploding.” From their indications, architecture is on life-support, taking its last breath. The critique they offer is that contemporary architecture has become (or always was?) insensitive to users, to site conditions, to history—hardly a novel view. Every few years, this kind of frontal assault on the value of contemporary architecture is launched, but the criticisms this time seem especially shallow and misplaced. Surveying the contemporary global architecture scene, I actually feel that we’re in a surprisingly healthy place, if you look beyond the obvious showpieces. We’ve escaped from the overt dogmas of the past, we’ve renewed our focus on issues of the environment and social agency, we’re more concerned than ever with tectonics and how to build with quality. But the perennial critics of contemporary architecture appear not to have examined that deeply, nor that thoughtfully either. And unfortunately the various rebuttals to their critiques, ostensibly in support of modern and experimental architecture, have been ham-handed and poorly argued.

Allied Works’ Clyfford Still Museum is a quieter and more effective building than its neighbor, Daniel Libeskind’s Denver Art Museum. Image © Jeremy Bittermann The Borneo Sporenburg development in Amsterdam demonstrates a streetscape of diverse, integrated modern facades. Image © Flickr CC user Fred (bigiof)BIG’s formally radical 8 House turned out to be socially radical as well, hosting a vital and lively community. Image ©  Jens LindheIn Portland's Pearl District, Modern buildings and parks coexist happily with semi-traditional or historic variants. Image via landarchs.com+ 12

Four Projects Shortlisted for 2017 Moriyama RAIC International Prize

The Royal Architectural Institute of Canada (RAIC) has announced the four projects shortlisted for the 2017 Moriyama RAIC International Prize. The prize was established in 2014 by Canadian architect Raymond Moriyama along with RAIC and the RAIC Foundation to recognise buildings that are judged to be " transformative within its societal context and reflect Moriyama's conviction that great architecture transforms society by promoting social justice and humanistic values of respect and inclusiveness."

"These projects celebrate human life and shape activity," commented RAIC President Ewa Bieniecka, FIRAC. "They embody innovation, contribute to how we experience space, and explore how spaces allow opportunities for freedom. The four shortlisted projects demonstrate how architecture is generous and gives back to the community. These works have a strong sense of place and connect to their surrounding landscape."

Awarded every two years, the winning project will receive a CAD $100,000 prize and a handcrafted sculpture by Canadian designer Wei Yew. The prize is open to all architects, irrespective of nationality and location. The inaugural prize was won by Chinese architect Li Xiaodong for his design of the Liyuan Library in Jiaojiehe, China.

See the shortlisted projects, after the break.

Melbourne School of Design, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia / John Wardle Architects and NADAAA. Image © Peter Bennetts“The Village Architect”, Shobac Campus, Upper Kingsburg, Nova Scotia, Canada / MacKay-Lyons Sweetapple Architects. Image © James Brittain8 House, Copenhagen, Denmark / BIG (Bjarke Ingels Group). Image © Bjarne TuliniusFuji Kindergarten, Tokyo, Japan / Tezuka Architects. Image © Tezuka Architects+ 35

Kvæsthus Pier / Lundgaard & Tranberg Architects

©  Jens Lindhe©  Jens Lindhe©  Jens Lindhe©  Jens Lindhe+ 12

40 Projects Shortlisted for the 2017 EU Prize for Contemporary Architecture - Mies Van Der Rohe Award

The European Commission and the Mies van der Rohe Foundation have announced the 40 shortlisted works that will compete for the 2017 European Union Prize for Contemporary Architecture – Mies van der Rohe Award. The jury has chosen from 355 nominated works and the shortlist highlights the opportunities and the trends of today’s European territory: cities, housing, heritage, and memory. The five finalists will be announced in mid-February and the winner and the Emerging Architect in mid-May.

A third of the works tackle the challenge of contemporary architecture in relation with built heritage and a third of the work tackles the contemporary challenges of housing. The management of the historic urban landscape will be among the priorities highlighted by the ‘European Year of Cultural Heritage' in 2018.

"I would want the shortlisted schemes to demonstrate an interest in making places, in exploring convention and known typologies, in celebrating the pleasures of everyday use by a consideration of detail and an unspoken resistance to the current global tendency towards a self-referential architecture, one that belies context and the act of inhabitation." - Stephen Bates, Chairman of the Jury.

Seen the shortlist after the break.

The Business of Design Success: How did BIG Get So... Big?

In recent years, the ever-increasing profile of Bjarke Ingels and his firm BIG have been hard to miss. For an office that is barely 10 years old, the number and scope of their projects is astonishing; to cope with demand, the firm has grown to employ almost 300 people. This growth, though, did not happen by accident. In this article, originally published on DesignIntelligence as "The Secret to BIG Success," Bob Fisher speaks to the firm's CEO and Partner Sheela Maini Søgaard in order to uncover the business plan behind the BIG phenomenon.

BIG may be the most appropriately named firm on the planet.

The Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG) seems to have an outsized impact in all it does. The Copenhagen-based design firm turns conventions and assumptions upside down and combines contrasting possibilities in outrageously bold, imaginative and playful ways. Projects like Via at West 57th Street in New York City and the Amager Bakke Waste-to-Energy Plant in Copenhagen are prime examples: the first a pyramid-shaped apartment building that defies the forest of rectangular towers around it, and the second a power plant that doubles as a smoke ring-blowing ski slope.

The world has taken note. Whether in praise or criticism, the architectural, cultural and business media tend to strike a heroic tone when describing the firm’s work: radical, ambitious, bold, confident. In short…BIG.

Danish National Maritime Museum, Helsingør. Image © Rasmus HjortshøjGammel Hellerup Gymnasium, Hellerup. Image © Jens Lindhe8 House, Copenhagen. Image © Dragor LuftfotoTwo World Trade Center in New York. Image © DBOX, Courtesy of BIG+ 9

Sports & Arts Expansion at Gammel Hellerup Gymnasium / BIG

© Jens Lindhe© Jens Lindhe© Jens Lindhe© Rasmus Hjortshoj+ 30

SDU Campus Kolding / Henning Larsen

© Jõrgen Weber© Martin Schubert ©  Jens Lindhe©  Jens Lindhe+ 27

Kolding, Denmark

Moesgaard Museum / Henning Larsen

©  Jens Lindhe© Martin Schubert © Jan Kofod Winther© Martin Schubert + 32

Trollbeads House / BBP Arkitekter

© Jens Lindhe
© Jens Lindhe
Copenhagen, Denmark

© Jens Lindhe© Jens Lindhe© Jens Lindhe© Jens Lindhe+ 36

Seven Projects Honored with Inaugural Active Design Award

Gammel Hellerup High School Gymnasium and Multipurpose Hall / BIG © Jens Lindhe
Gammel Hellerup High School Gymnasium and Multipurpose Hall / BIG © Jens Lindhe

To promote the role that architecture and design plays in addressing ongoing obesity and chronic disease issues around the world, the Center for Active Design launched their first ever design excellence awards. Seven projects have been selected to recieve the inaugural prize for their ability to encourage physical activity and active use of space. Check out each of the award winning designs, after the break...

The 20 Most Visited ArchDaily Projects of All Time

To celebrate our birthday today, we decided to take a look back at the most popular projects of the last six years. Who takes the top spot? Zaha Hadid? Frank Gehry? Well, you may be surprised...

See our 20 most popular projects of all time, after the break...

Gammel Hellerup Gymnasium / BIG

©  Jens Lindhe©  Jens Lindhe©  Jens Lindhe©  Jens Lindhe+ 36

Hellerup, Denmark
  • Area Area of this architecture project Area:  1100
  • Year Completion year of this architecture project Year:  2013
  • Manufacturers Brands with products used in this architecture project
    Manufacturers: Aluflam, Flexwood A/S

Ama'r Children's Culture House / Dorte Mandrup

©  Jens Lindhe
© Jens Lindhe
Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Architects: Dorte Mandrup
  • Year Completion year of this architecture project Year:  2013
  • Manufacturers Brands with products used in this architecture project
    Manufacturers: Troldtekt

© Torben Eskerod© Torben EskerodCourtesy of Dorte Mandrup©  Jens Lindhe+ 34

Superkilen / Topotek 1 + BIG Architects + Superflex

© Iwan Baan© Iwan Baan© Iwan Baan© Torben Eskerod+ 58

Copenhagen, Denmark

Mountain Dwellings / PLOT = BIG + JDS

© Maria Gonzalez© Maria Gonzalez© Maria Gonzalez© Maria Gonzalez+ 51

Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Architects: PLOT
  • Area Area of this architecture project Area:  33000
  • Year Completion year of this architecture project Year:  2008

Signalhuset / NOBEL

Signalhuset / NOBELSignalhuset / NOBELSignalhuset / NOBELSignalhuset / NOBEL+ 12

Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Architects: NOBEL
  • Area Area of this architecture project Area:  8
  • Year Completion year of this architecture project Year:  2006