the world's most visited architecture website
i

Sign up now and start saving and organizing your favorite architecture projects and photos

Sign up now to save and organize your favorite architecture projects

i

Find the most inspiring products for your projects in our Product Catalog.

Find the most inspiring products in our Product Catalog.

i

Get the ArchDaily Chrome Extension and be inspired with every new tab. Install here »

i

All over the world, architects are finding cool ways to re-use run-down old buildings. Click here to see the best in Refurbishment Architecture.

Want to see the coolest refurbishment projects? Click here.

i

Immerse yourself in inspiring buildings with our selection of 360 videos. Click here.

See our immersive, inspiring 360 videos. Click here.

All
Projects
Products
Events
Competitions
Navigate articles using your keyboard
  1. ArchDaily
  2. News
  3. Judging Architecture by Altered Photos: Has Photoshop Gone Too Far?

Judging Architecture by Altered Photos: Has Photoshop Gone Too Far?

Judging Architecture by Altered Photos: Has Photoshop Gone Too Far?
Judging Architecture by Altered Photos: Has Photoshop Gone Too Far?, An image of El Centro showing a portion of the rooftop mechanical equipment. Image © flickr user jkz, licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0
An image of El Centro showing a portion of the rooftop mechanical equipment. Image © flickr user jkz, licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0

How much editing is acceptable in architectural photographs? And what if those edited photographs are the basis of judging a design competition? Chicago Tribune architecture critic Blair Kamin explored these questions in a recent column after an altered photo led to a Design Excellence Award from the Chicago chapter of the AIA. The building in question, the El Centro campus of Northeastern Illinois University designed by Juan Moreno, was one of five recipients of the chapter's honor award, the highest level of recognition. But one of photos submitted to the award jury had been digitally altered by the photographer to remove a prominent row of large air handling units on the roof that marred one of the best views of the building.

Admittedly, no two-dimensional media, whether photographs or drawings, can ever fully and accurately represent the three-dimensional spatial experience of a building, but Kamin nonetheless asserts that architectural photography is supposed to have a certain honesty. By contrast, Kamin notes that the AIA National Awards require at least one juror to visit each short-listed building, while the Pritzker Prize jury travels extensively to visit potential recipients’ buildings. Acknowledging that most awards programs cannot match the standards of the Pritzker Prize, he proposes a new standard: “Photographs that doctor the reality of a building or omit key perspectives of it will be considered outside the pale of ethical standards and will cause a project to be eliminated from consideration.”

Read Kamin’s column, and see the original offending photos, here.

About this author
David Douglass-Jaimes
Author
Cite: David Douglass-Jaimes. "Judging Architecture by Altered Photos: Has Photoshop Gone Too Far?" 12 Dec 2015. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/778583/judging-architecture-by-altered-photos-has-photoshop-gone-too-far/> ISSN 0719-8884
Read comments

You've started following your first account!

Did you know?

You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.