We are currently in Beta version and updating this search on a regular basis. We’d love to hear your feedback here.

Home

Learn more about the story behind our new brand identity.

Read more

Assault on a Sacred Place

Assault on a Sacred Place

This article was originally published on Common Edge.

For most people, calling a place “sacred” designates it as an important location, one usually associated with spirituality. It might be the setting for religious rituals (the sacred space of a church, synagogue, or mosque), a spot where some event described as “miraculous” has occurred (such as the reported sighting of the Virgin Mary in Lourdes, France, which became a pilgrimage site), or a place which held the body of deity (think of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem, built upon what is believed the be the tomb of Jesus Christ). 

But it’s also possible to think of a secular place as sacred. We were reminded of this in the aftermath of the tragic, violent events of January 6, when a mob of domestic terrorists attacked the United States Capitol building, in which a joint session of Congress had convened to certify the Electoral College votes for the 2020 presidential election. These domestic terrorists—whose actions, I might add, were both prompted and promoted by the nation’s highest office holder—breached doors on the Capitol’s east portico, smashed windows, wandered through hallways and staircases past historic relics, and occupied the Senate chamber (one seditionist lounged on the Senate dais, which had been occupied by the Vice President only minutes before), trashing these spaces in the process. Several people died, and a Capitol Police officer was killed, as a result of this mob assault.


Related Article

Public Protests and the Urban Legacies of Colonialism and Military Dictatorship in Nigeria

As the Capitol building and grounds were secured and the terrorists removed, reactions poured forth: on websites and social media, in radio and TV broadcasts, and in print. Many of these responses of shock and disgust were expressed in language typically reserved for holy places, a good indication of how this landmark of national civic architecture is transcendent. In his remarks on the Senate floor, Senator Dick Durbin said that the Capitol was “a sacred place … desecrated by a mob. This temple to democracy was defiled.” Representative Mario Diaz-Balart described the Capitol as “the center and sacred symbol of democracy.” Senator Patrick Lahey noted that the invading terrorists had “defiled” the building. In the aftermath, during a press conference, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi described the Capitol as “the temple of our American democracy.” Former President Barack Obama bemoaned the “desecrated chambers of democracy,” while President-Elect Joe Biden said that we “grieve the desecration of the people’s house.” Columnist Mario A. Loyola wrote that “hallowed ground was violated today by an unspeakable sacrilege.”

Pro-Trump mob stormed United States Capitol in January 6, 2021. Image © Archna Nautiyal | Shutterstock
Pro-Trump mob stormed United States Capitol in January 6, 2021. Image © Archna Nautiyal | Shutterstock

Talking of this building in such ways clearly demonstrates that the U.S. Capitol is something more than just a legislative facility. Because it has been a setting for, and witness to, historical events and the deliberative democratic process, it has taken on a sacred mantle. (This is not to ignore the fact that the building holds a complex history in its design and development during America’s first century, not to mention numerous unspeakable acts of cruelty supported by legislation enacted within it, just as horrific events have been perpetrated by and given the blessing of religious organizations around the world for centuries). 

Unlike any other building in Washington, D.C., the U.S. Capitol is designed to be a symbol of the belief in this country that democracy is a sacred undertaking. The building’s architecture includes neoclassical elements derived from Greek and Roman temples, symbols of the birthplace of democracy and of the earliest republic. Originally, domes were reserved for religious buildings, but in the 18th and 19th centuries they began to appear on structures of civic importance as a symbol of power and unity, to lend a sense of sacredness to the democratic process. The dome on the U.S. Capitol was a later addition to the building, started some 60 years after construction commenced in 1793. For Lincoln, who frequently spoke of the country in religious terms, the dome was an important symbol of the survival of the Union, which is why he insisted that its construction continue during the Civil War. 

According to the website of the Architect of the Capitol, the rotunda (which, notably, it describes as “hallowed”) under the dome was completed by architect Charles Bulfinch in 1824. He intended the rotunda to evoke the space of the Pantheon in Rome, one of the most ancient temples in existence. The dome interior presented a canvas upon which to amplify the sacrosanct nature of the building and the activities it sheltered. While domestic terrorists strolled through the rotunda recently, amid statues of past presidents and American luminaries, high above their heads was a fresco conceived and painted by Constantino Brumidi in 1865. Before he came to the U.S. in the 1850s, Brumidi had trained as a neoclassical artist in Rome and had painted interiors at the Vatican, so he was the perfect choice for creating a sacred space commemorating the country’s founding. His painting in the eye of the dome, The Apotheosis of Washington, depicts the nation’s first president rising into the heavens in glory (in theology, “apotheosis” refers to the elevation of an individual to the rank of a god).

Several media reporters who had spent years working in the Capitol spoke of a sense of loss (many of them tears) while watching the events of January 6. This seems not unlike what was witnessed as the Cathédral Notre-Dame de Paris burned in April 2019. Such an assault on architecture can be felt viscerally. 

Throughout history, when conquerors invaded enemy territory, a way to terrify and vanquish the native was to destroy their most sacred, symbolic works of architecture. A memorable example of this was when Taliban terrorists blew up two gigantic Buddha statues during their attack on Bamiyan, Afghanistan in 2001. The U.S. Capitol’s domestic terrorists behaved likewise, believing that their destructive behavior could mortally wound this temple and what it stood for. 

 But they are wrong. Desecrated and defiled places believed to be sacred can be repaired, restored, and (in the process) re-sanctified. There are no sacred places unless we preserve them in that state of grace. Their symbolic power lives on in our hearts, and their sanctity is a product of our belief in, and dedication to, what they stand for.  

About this author
Cite: Michael J. Crosbie. "Assault on a Sacred Place" 22 Jan 2021. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/955561/assault-on-a-sacred-place> ISSN 0719-8884

You've started following your first account!

Did you know?

You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.