the world's most visited architecture website
i

Sign up now and start saving and organizing your favorite architecture projects and photos

Sign up now to save and organize your favorite architecture projects

i

Find the most inspiring products for your projects in our Product Catalog.

Find the most inspiring products in our Product Catalog.

i

Get the ArchDaily Chrome Extension and be inspired with every new tab. Install here »

i

All over the world, architects are finding cool ways to re-use run-down old buildings. Click here to see the best in Refurbishment Architecture.

Want to see the coolest refurbishment projects? Click here.

i

Immerse yourself in inspiring buildings with our selection of 360 videos. Click here.

See our immersive, inspiring 360 videos. Click here.

All
Projects
Products
Events
Competitions
Navigate articles using your keyboard
  1. ArchDaily
  2. Projects
  3. Government
  4. United Kingdom
  5. Charles Barry and A.W. Pugin
  6. 1867
  7. AD Classics: Palace of Westminster / Charles Barry & Augustus Pugin

AD Classics: Palace of Westminster / Charles Barry & Augustus Pugin

AD Classics: Palace of Westminster / Charles Barry & Augustus Pugin
AD Classics: Palace of Westminster / Charles Barry & Augustus Pugin, The Palace of Westminster as seen from the River Thames. Image Courtesy of Flickr user Alex Brown
The Palace of Westminster as seen from the River Thames. Image Courtesy of Flickr user Alex Brown

At 6:20pm on the evening of October 16, 1834, a fire began in the old Palace of Westminster in London – the foremost seat of parliamentary governance for both the United Kingdom and the British Empire across the seas. The inferno, which burned until the early hours of the morning, destroyed so much of the medieval complex that neither restoration nor preservation were considered viable options – a new palace would have to rise from the ashes to surround the largely undamaged Westminster Hall.[1] The fire gave the United Kingdom a chance not only to replace what was considered as an outdated, patchwork of government buildings, but to erect a Gothic Revival landmark to spiritually embody the pre-eminence of the United Kingdom across the world, and the roots of modern democracy.

Elevation. Image Courtesy of Merrell Publishers Limited Drawing of the 'Estimates' design for the House of Lords by Pugin. ImageCourtesy of Yale University Press The original, unsatisfactory design for the House of Commons. ImageCourtesy of Yale University Press Plan. Image Courtesy of Yale University Press, Ltd. + 13

Courtesy of Country Life Books
Courtesy of Country Life Books

From the late 11th century until the reign of Henry VIII, the Palace of Westminster served as a royal residence. Various monarchs of England and the subsequent United Kingdom (England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland) made their own additions and renovations to the palace as the centuries passed. The Great Hall of the palace, now known as Westminster Hall, was completed in 1099 by William II; Richard II would later remodel the space, removing the Norman columns that supported the roof and replacing them with a “hammerbeam” wooden roof that remains in place to this day. After Henry VIII moved the royal residence away from Westminster in 1534, the palace transitioned to use by the British Parliament.[2]

The 1830s and 1840s proved a tumultuous time for the United Kingdom: mainland Europe was awash with revolutions, famine struck both Britain and Ireland, and political upheaval was changing the landscape of British government. When the House of Commons (the elected body of the government) launched a design competition for the new Palace of Westminster, they specified that entries must be in either Neo-Gothic or Neo-Elizabethan styles – a symbolic gesture that would connect the new building to the order, stability, and prowess of the nation’s past.[3]

Westminster Hall on Fire 1834. Water Colour by George B. Campion, 1834 (c) Parliamentary Art Collection

A photo posted by Jorge Otero-Pailos (@oteropailos) on

Plan. Image Courtesy of Yale University Press, Ltd.
Plan. Image Courtesy of Yale University Press, Ltd.

A rectangular site, measuring roughly 800 by 350 feet (244 by 107 meters) along the bank of the Thames River, was laid out for the competitors.. Alongside preserving Westminster Hall, architects were required to provide chambers for both the House of Lords and the House of Commons, a variety of offices, and accommodations for officials who needed to be on call at all times.[4] Out of the 97 entries submitted, the parliamentary committee awarded the first prize to Charles Barry – architect of numerous churches, country houses (including Highclere Castle, of Downton Abbey fame), and civic buildings.[5]

Drawing of the 'Estimates' design for the House of Lords by Pugin. ImageCourtesy of Yale University Press
Drawing of the 'Estimates' design for the House of Lords by Pugin. ImageCourtesy of Yale University Press

Although Barry’s initial proposal, with drawings by Augustus Pugin, made a large enough impression to win him the competition, it was only selected with the caveat that it required significant revision. Over the next several years, the building evolved substantially in both plan and elevation: the two parliament chambers moved to accommodate a new octagonal central hall, sections of the building were realigned, and the two towers grew taller, with the northern one becoming a clock tower (now housing the bell, Big Ben). In this process, what had originally been a comparatively economical proposal became increasingly extravagant, drawing ire from the people against both Parliament and Barry.[6]

Elevation. Image Courtesy of Merrell Publishers Limited
Elevation. Image Courtesy of Merrell Publishers Limited

The foundation stone for the Palace was laid on April 27, 1840 by Sarah Barry, Charles Barry’s wife. From that moment, 775,000 cubic feet of stone were shipped in and assembled into a palace comprising 1,180 rooms, two miles of corridors, and 126 staircases.[7] The chosen stone was a sandy limestone from Anston Quarry in Yorkshire and, while the material was comparatively cheap and suited to intricate carving, it proved ineffective at withstanding the coal pollution for which industrial London was notorious and ultimately had to be replaced between 1928 and 1960.[8]

Elevation, Plan, Section. Image Courtesy of Merrell Publishers Limited
Elevation, Plan, Section. Image Courtesy of Merrell Publishers Limited

The final, built incarnation of the new Palace of Westminster featured a full 914 feet of horizontal frontage along the River Thames, punctuated by raised turrets and the three main towers that dominate the complex.[9] Victoria Tower, the tallest and largest of the three, was built to crown the Sovereign’s Entrance (as, according to tradition, the Monarch may never tread near the House of Commons) and to house Parliament records. The Central Tower, which was built for ventilation, takes the form of a spire, visually contrasting it with the towers at either end of the Palace. The clock tower, very recently named Elizabeth Tower in homage to Queen Elizabeth II, yet commonly known as Big Ben, presented a challenge to Barry who struggled to produce a design that made the clock itself sufficiently prominent. The ultimate solution was to project the clock story out from the sides of the tower; the four clock faces themselves were designed by Pugin. [10,11]

Elizabeth Tower (also known as "Big Ben" for the bell within). Image Courtesy of Flickr user Eric Huybrechts
Elizabeth Tower (also known as "Big Ben" for the bell within). Image Courtesy of Flickr user Eric Huybrechts

Delays and conflicts plagued Barry throughout the project. Both Houses of Parliament constantly scrutinized the architect, requiring him to justify revisions before numerous committees, explain why construction was taking so long, and generally interfering in the design process. A particular frustration was Parliament’s insistence that Barry work with Doctor David Boswell Reid, a Scottish scientist of dubious credibility whose schemes for ventilation took up vast swathes of interior space and greatly increased the flammability of the Palace. The House of Commons rejected its chamber almost immediately after its completion in 1850, criticizing the acoustics and layout of the space and forcing Barry to radically alter it. Such delays were blamed solely on Barry, despite that he had faithfully followed Parliament’s instructions. Rumors swirled as to whether the architect would resign from the project; instead, he passed away in 1860, leaving the remaining work to be completed by his son.[12]

The original, unsatisfactory design for the House of Commons. ImageCourtesy of Yale University Press
The original, unsatisfactory design for the House of Commons. ImageCourtesy of Yale University Press
The revised form of the House of Commons, February 1852. ImageCourtesy of Yale University Press
The revised form of the House of Commons, February 1852. ImageCourtesy of Yale University Press

The new Palace of Westminster was finally completed in 1867, 33 years after fire had consumed its medieval predecessor. Its Gothic splendor, while recalling the the continuity of the past, became a potent symbol of a changing nation; when revolutions overturned much of Europe, the United Kingdom’s parliamentary reforms defused the worst of the upheaval in the British Isles.[13] The monumental new Houses of Parliament, while garbed in an interpretation of time gone by, stood as a prominent icon of a newer, more democratic order – one that has survived both the ravages of time and the Blitz of the Second World War to remain one of London’s most iconic architectural landmarks.

House of Commons. Image Courtesy of Burton Skira, Inc.
House of Commons. Image Courtesy of Burton Skira, Inc.

References
[1]
Cooke, Robert, Sir. The Palace of Westminster: Houses of Parliament. New York, NY: Burton Skira, 1987. p69-75.
[2] Montague-Smith, Patrick W., and Hugh Montgomery-Massingberd. The Country Life Book of Royal Palaces, Castles & Homes: Including Vanished Palaces and Historic Houses with Royal Connections. London: Country Life Books, 1981. p65-68.
[3] Cannadine, David. The Houses of Parliament: History, Art and Architecture. London: Merrell, 2000. p13-15.
[4] Port, M. H. The Houses of Parliament. New Haven: Published for the Paul Mellon Centre for Studies in British Art (London) by Yale University Press, 1976. p32-33.
[5] Port, p41.
[6] Cooke, p98.
[7] Jones, Christopher. The Great Palace: The Story of Parliament. London: British Broadcasting, 1983. p101.
[8] "The Stonework." UK Parliament. Accessed June 14, 2016. [access].
[9] Cowan, Henry J., and Trevor Howells. A Guide to the World's Greatest Buildings: Masterpieces of Architecture & Engineering. San Francisco: Fog City Press, 2000. p102.
[10] Cannadine, p131.
[11] "The Towers of Parliament." UK Parliament. Accessed June 14, 2016. [access].
[12] Jones, p103-107.
[13] Cowan and Howells, p103.

View the complete gallery

Location to be used only as a reference. It could indicate city/country but not exact address.
About this office
Charles Barry and A.W. Pugin
Office
Cite: Luke Fiederer. "AD Classics: Palace of Westminster / Charles Barry & Augustus Pugin" 20 Jun 2016. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/789671/ad-classics-palace-of-westminster-houses-of-parliament-london-uk-charles-barry-and-augustus-pugin/> ISSN 0719-8884
The Palace of Westminster as seen from the River Thames. Image Courtesy of Flickr user Alex Brown

AD 经典:威斯敏斯特宫 / 查尔斯·巴里和奥古斯塔斯·普金