the world's most visited architecture website
i

Sign up now and start saving and organizing your favorite architecture projects and photos

Sign up now to save and organize your favorite architecture projects

i

Find the most inspiring products for your projects in our Product Catalog.

Find the most inspiring products in our Product Catalog.

i

Get the ArchDaily Chrome Extension and be inspired with every new tab. Install here »

i

All over the world, architects are finding cool ways to re-use run-down old buildings. Click here to see the best in Refurbishment Architecture.

Want to see the coolest refurbishment projects? Click here.

i

Immerse yourself in inspiring buildings with our selection of 360 videos. Click here.

See our immersive, inspiring 360 videos. Click here.

All
Projects
Products
Events
Competitions
Navigate articles using your keyboard
  1. ArchDaily
  2. News
  3. Why Spaces Shouldn't Be Described as "Masculine" or "Feminine"

Why Spaces Shouldn't Be Described as "Masculine" or "Feminine"

Why Spaces Shouldn't Be Described as "Masculine" or "Feminine"
Why Spaces Shouldn't Be Described as "Masculine" or "Feminine", The interior design of bedrooms is often described as "feminine". Image © robinimages2013 via Shutterstock
The interior design of bedrooms is often described as "feminine". Image © robinimages2013 via Shutterstock

What is the most misused word in the world of architectural writing? Could it be "iconic"? What about "innovative"? The staff over at Curbed have a nomination: referring to spaces as either "masculine" or "feminine." In an op-ed published last month, they write that "the people who write about decor and design need to stop describing spaces with gendered terms," arguing: "Let's say two spaces were written up in a decor blog, and one was described as masculine, and the other feminine. Which would have white walls? Which would have raw concrete floors? ... If these have fairly easy answers, it's because we're in the realm of stereotype."

Lowe Campbell Ewald Headquarters by Neumann/Smith Architecture; "masculine," naturally. Image © Justin Maconochie
Lowe Campbell Ewald Headquarters by Neumann/Smith Architecture; "masculine," naturally. Image © Justin Maconochie

Boiling their argument down as far as possible, they add: "If spareness and raw architecture are "masculine," then we're essentially saying that traditionally "feminine" decorating is frivolous. Suddenly those who associate themselves with femininity become a little less essential and a little less relevant."

The discussion has far-reaching ramifications. For example, what does it mean when offices, where there is little room for frills and frivolity, are more likely to be described as "masculine" buildings? And are we comfortable with the idea that the word "feminine" is largely used to describe, homes, fashion stores and beauty salons? "Gendered design writing is lazily offensive," concludes Curbed. "But more to the point, it's offensively lazy. We can do better." Read the article in full here.

Image of bedroom via Shutterstock.

About this author
Rory Stott
Author
Cite: Rory Stott. "Why Spaces Shouldn't Be Described as "Masculine" or "Feminine"" 04 Jan 2015. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/583790/why-spaces-shouldn-t-be-described-as-masculine-or-feminine/> ISSN 0719-8884
Read comments