Visit our Products section to learn more about architectural products.

Prada Transformer, Position 2: Cinema

By David Basulto — Filed under: Art , Structures , , , , ,
 
© Iwan Baan

© Iwan Baan

Rem Koolhaas’ latest project -The Prada Transformer- is not just a building, but also a statement on today´s state of architecture. Dubbed the anti-blob, this “object” rejects all common blobby shapes we have seen lately. Simple geometrical shapes (a circle, a cross, a rectangle and an hexagon) enclose a space that depending on its rotation results on different spaces suitable for fashion exhibitions, cinema, art exhibitions and other special events. Each face is the platform on which these activities take place, while also being served by the other faces enclosing the space.

A few weeks ago, we presented the Transformer at Position 1 (Fashion Exhibition) with photos by Iwan Baan . Now, he sent us his photo set for the Transformer at Position 2: Cinema.

From June 26th to July 5th, the Transformer used a center piece on one of the faces to project “Flesh, Mind and Soul”, a film festival co-curated by Alejandro González Iñárritu (director Babel, 21 Grams). Please note that the interiors are now almost all black.

As of now, the Transformer is going through some changes to debut on its new position on Jul 30th to host “Beyond Control”, an exhibition by the Prada Foundation.

More photos by Iwan Baan after the break and the complete photo set on Iwan’s website:

 

16 comments »

16:08:78 says:

The concept is great, although the name seems “a little cheesy”, it’s so obvious it’s a marketing strategy; given the case that a movie with that same name was rolling at the same time this “object” was on exhibition.

What I really find interesting is the engagement on the “anti-blob” statement. It seems OMA is articulating the symptoms of an inevitable era to come. Architecture is at war!!!

 
# July 14, 2009 at 09:32
    davvid says:

    16:08:78, great comment

    Maybe architecture needs a civil war. If Rem is leading one side–who is leading the other?

     
    # July 14, 2009 at 10:55
Cristian Alvarado says:

To much concept, no to much functionality, I have enormous respect for Mr Rem, but i think this time his name is was must important over the idea to make a good space.

 
# July 14, 2009 at 10:14
Luis says:

mecanical architecture….cool

 
# July 14, 2009 at 10:54

Well, you have to hand it to Prada, this dumb publicity stunt just keeps on working. It does boggle the imagination to call it anti-blob architecture (or architecture at all for that matter). This ridiculous toy always makes me think of schoolgirls little bag filled with Jax.

Terry Glenn Phipps
http://www.me.com/tgphipps

 
# July 14, 2009 at 10:57

Meh. In designing the “anti-blob,” Koolhas has given me more reason than ever to prefer the blobs he so detests. To be an “anti-” something does not obligate a structure to be an ugly version of what it is.

 
# July 14, 2009 at 12:15

Yeah!!! Come strong haters…

 
# July 14, 2009 at 14:04
Drunkmuse says:

It’s akin to taking a building and going through the gymnastics of flipping it on it’s side just cause you need to be creative about programmatic elements. “Oh look dear, our kitchen floor is now the headboard in the beadroom” Well……It is just that. Bluntly non-creative. A transformative peice needn’t be so literal. Well…I bet Rem will try to pass this one of as a “tongue-in cheek” peice. It’s the Andy Kaufmann’s take on architecture. Yea Right!

 
# July 14, 2009 at 15:10
    davvid says:

    or is it Charlie Kaufman’s take on architecture?

     
    # July 14, 2009 at 16:05

    Why can’t things be so literal?
    …We can banter and confer and explain and contemplate for ages, but hardly anything will be concluded. Thus is the way of architecture.

     
    # July 14, 2009 at 20:52
Steven says:

Some of you critics seem to take this too seriously. Architecture is not the be all end all. It’s important, but it is also fun and commercial and defensive and practical and impractical and lively and provocative and banal and so much more and less. None of it is permanent. They’re just buildings.

 
# July 15, 2009 at 09:21
ale gaddor says:

please, anyone out there
please,, stop this journalist (koolhaas) who’s trying to do anything to get our attention,,,and the more press possible
please,,, someone tell him

 
# July 15, 2009 at 17:37
Sonic says:

…so polemic…..

 
# July 31, 2009 at 14:42
rodrigo tello says:

ale gaddor

he also studied architecture as you and me

 
# September 25, 2009 at 18:02
Klaus says:
# October 8, 2009 at 09:16
billel says:

need plans and dimensions of kaufmann house

 
# October 27, 2009 at 11:18

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

wise words and perfect picture[+]
totally agree with Terry Glenn Phipps this is nothing...[+]
love it all! its color, its details, and its...[+]
Been there and falled in love with...[+]
simply good and buildable concept… few buildings...[+]
looks great. genious use of industrial material. been to...[+]
88 people died[+]
Great project. I love that depressed ground floor,...[+]
I think architects are getting more confused by the...[+]
this building is awsome![+]
very nice lighting inside[+]
I used the brick first[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »