How Popular Could "Anti-Builder" and "Anti-Architect" Homes Become?

How Popular Could "Anti-Builder" and "Anti-Architect" Homes Become?

The UK is in the midst of a housing crisis, the intricacies of which were detailed by Rowan Moore earlier this year. For decades the typical British housing stock has been of relatively poor quality, proliferated by developer-led consortiums and characterised by ruthless cost-efficiency for maximum profit. From this formula comes nothing but a monotony of off-the-shelf constructions which have, over time, become a national benchmark. These houses – often built of brick, boxy in form, and using as little space in the facade for openings – are commonly dark, spatially inadequate, and far below the standards that should be being aimed for. It’s like living in a well-appointed cave.

The 'Palmerston' - typical contemporary mass British housing stock. Image © Barratt Homes

As a counter to this unfortunate truth some companies are offering new, more unique ways to build your own house – thereby ditching the builder and the architect in one move. In a recent article for The Guardian, Shane Hickey introduces the Hivehaus which is, according to their marketing statement, "an innovative new concept in modular living space – inspired by nature – influenced by modernism and constructed using unconventional building techniques."

Perhaps an "anti-builder" and "anti-architect” movement for first-time buyers is not such a bad thing. It proves that architects, contractors, developers and local authorities should, generally speaking, aim higher.

via Hivehaus
via Hivehaus

Read the article in full here.

About this author
Cite: James Taylor-Foster. "How Popular Could "Anti-Builder" and "Anti-Architect" Homes Become?" 09 Jul 2015. ArchDaily. Accessed . <> ISSN 0719-8884

You've started following your first account!

Did you know?

You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.