Monterrey Housing / ELEMENTAL

© Ramiro Ramirez

Architects: ELEMENTAL
Location: Monterrey,
Client: Instituto de la Vivienda de Nuevo León (IVNL)
Engineering: Area of projects and technological innovation, IVNL
Urbanization & Specialization: Area of projects and technological innovation, IVNL
Site Area: 6,591 sqm
Initial House Area: 40 sqm
Expanded House Area: 58.75 sqm
Initial Duplex Area: 40 sqm
Expanded Duplex Area: 76.60 sqm
Project Year: 2010
Photographs: Ramiro Ramirez

Restrictions

Santa Catarina is a city of 230,000 inhabitants, located in the state of Nuevo León, in the northwest of Mexico. This project is ’s first outside of Chile.

site plan

The Government of Nuevo León, México, commissioned us to design a group of 70 homes on a site of .6 hectars in a middle class neighborhood in Santa Catarina. The required density suggested the application of the typology we developed for Iquique. However, the climate in Santa Catarina is very different from the northern dessert climate of Chile. The 600 mm of annual rainfall required us to adapt our proposal to this new question.

© Ramiro Ramirez

The commission to develop this middle class neighborhood with the financing of US$20,000 per dwelling (almost double the funds we had for the housing projects built by Elemental in Chile). However, the construction standards and building codes significantly raise the construction costs. In this case, it was pertinent to use the strategy of investing state resources to build “the difficult half” of the home, especially given the capacity do-it-yourself building observed in Mexico, ensuring a promising future for the expansions.

The Project

ELEMENTAL Monterrey consists of a three-story continuous building that in section superimposes a home (first floor) with a two-story apartment above (2nd and 3rd story). Both units are designed to technically and economically facilitate the final middle class standard of which we will hand over the “first half” (40 m2). In this sense, the difficult parts of the house (bathrooms, kitchen, stairs, and dividing walls) are designed for the expanded scenario, that is, for a home of more than 58 m2 approx. and an apartment of approximately 76 m2.

© Ramiro Ramirez

Secondly, given that almost 50% of the m2 of the complex will be self-built, this building is porous so that the growth can occur within the structure. On one hand we want to frame and give rhythm (more than control) to the spontaneous construction so as to avoid deterioration of the urban environment over time, and also make the process of expansions for each family easier. The proposed continuous roof above the volumes and voids protects the expansion zones from rain and ensures a definitive profile of the building toward the public space.

section
© Ramiro Ramirez

Third, experience tells us that in lower class neighborhoods the green spaces tend to be “earth spaces,” due to the scarcity of maintenance and the distance that exists between green space and the home that makes it difficult for neighbors to take care of. What we did in this case was to surround the green space with building, reducing the distance between communal space and the home to a minimum. This permitted us to define a collective space with secure Access that gives space to the social network and generates favorable conditions for maintenance and care.

All the apartments have direct Access from the public space and parking, a condition especially relevant in a country where every family can have access to an automobile.

View this project in Google Maps

* Location to be used only as a reference. It could indicate city/country but not exact address.
Cite: "Monterrey Housing / ELEMENTAL" 09 Mar 2010. ArchDaily. Accessed 23 Jul 2014. <http://www.archdaily.com/?p=52202>

43 comments

  1. Thumb up Thumb down -2

    ohhh my!!! what is that? this is not architecture, please help us and free us for this kind of architecture, obiously is for latinamerican countries… so bad!!

    • Thumb up Thumb down +2

      @Mark if u would use your brain a little instead of ur eyes and read u would know the real value of this project.

    • Thumb up Thumb down -1

      pobre mark. anyway…..
      Look for this proyect under “quinta Monroy” Iquique, Chile by Alejandro Aravena.
      total rip off.

    • Thumb up Thumb down 0

      poor idiot. its functional and i could even feel a real special atmosphere winding through the park and buildings

    • Thumb up Thumb down +2

      mark, do you even know what architecture is about? That is, in its most elemental purpose, to serve the need for a shelter.
      If you could understand that the need of a house/apartment in that (this) city, is increasing exponentially, AND that this team´s propposal is absolutely efficient in terms of space optimization and flexibility, for a low-cost housing project, you would be ashamed of your post. Not to mention they are also Latin. capital L like the one on your forehead.

      Please help us and free us of your pathetic, dispectful comments, and STOP discriminating.

  2. Thumb up Thumb down 0

    love this project, hope all of the social housing around latin america could be as good as this ones

  3. Thumb up Thumb down -2

    Are you kidding???? this is a total rip off from Alejandro Aravena’s work in Chile, for social housing, is exactly the same without the roof and difference in materials.

    • Thumb up Thumb down 0

      LOL I hope that is irony…. you do know who is excecutive director of elemental? Anyways.. this is another great example that architecture can exist in the humblest of structures.

    • Thumb up Thumb down 0

      Alejandro aravena is part of ELEMENTAL´s design team, I wouldn’t call it a ripoff…
      Its more like a repeated formula of space organization for horizontal condominiums.
      Only time will tell if its appliable to different surroundings.
      -it worked perfectly in Chile.

  4. Thumb up Thumb down -3

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    • Thumb up Thumb down +3

      @dustin…
      I just don´t understand how do you believe that the intention of giving houses to the people that don´t have any access to loans, credits, or to buy by any chance a house, because they make less than $100 us dlls a week, it is NOT good… and you say that you know that what happens a lot in Mexico? horrible details, ugly decorations, disproportionate forms? well is their fault, they missed the most important classes when they were in architecture school right? I think i disagree with you when you say that the building would be ALWAYS monotonous, and i agree when you say that every family has different needs, that is why, the building NEVER would be monotonous, every one would add their own character to the complex. And just so you know, even when every family has different needs, customs and desires, they share the same principal need, the need of having a house to live in, can you imagine how many people could we help making each house according to each user? (obviously in terms of social housing). I know it would be hard to understand because the level of your standards, and the kind of houses that we´ve (you and me) lived on, but when you see how this people live, the cost of this houses compared to what would cost this wherever you live, against what this people make, you´ll understand that this is a very good first step for them to keep moving fordward, and chasing their dreams. I´m sorry if i sound rude, is not my intention, but i wanted you to know a little bit more about this project, before you speak your mind again, about our city and our culture. I know this project, and i´ve been there, and belive me is not as bad as you think it is. Have a good week.

      • Thumb up Thumb down 0

        bravo taller.componente!!! well said. kudos to you.
        i believe there were quite a few who thought that the significance of the project depends on its face value. people forgot that architecture addresses the needs of the occupant, not candies for one’s eyes. simplicity reveals true beauty, cosmetics conceals it.

  5. Thumb up Thumb down 0

    Excuse my ignorance, but will the new structure (floor) not damage the original structure? or how will that be done? can someone explain for me, thankyou

    • Thumb up Thumb down 0

      Yeah and what about continuity of insulation? Everything is more expensive if completed afterwards

    • Thumb up Thumb down 0

      A lot of people in Latin America are knowledgeable in pouring concrete slabs, in fact, in certain places a concrete is cheaper than steel framing. You can notice the pre-constructed beams in the exterior walls for that slab. It is probably engineered for the extra structure.

      For insulation if this is in the tropics and you have 8″ block walls and no air conditioning you do not need insulation. Just open the jalousie window, and turn on the cheap fan, maybe open the door.

      Take the chance and look outside your country. Not everyone lives and constructs the same.

  6. Thumb up Thumb down 0

    Great architecture, but i don’t underdstand how completing the volume can be more economic than building it alltogether in the first place! Also, the caracter of this building is determined by the voids and the transparency with the inner court (that will be lost), even if i doubt they will ever manage to plant trees.

  7. Thumb up Thumb down 0

    I guess I’m missing the reasoning behind the huge exterior staircase. As an engineering feat they are impressive, aesthetically they look out of place to me.

  8. Thumb up Thumb down 0

    ARCHDAILY can you please explain why my comments always get deleted? It was in English and it was a good argument with nothing worthy of moderation. Thank you.

  9. Thumb up Thumb down 0

    i really appreciate the rigor to this. the project was clearly conceived and executed with a large idea behind it. well done.

  10. Thumb up Thumb down 0

    look at iquique, in about two years this project will be totally different, the white and the rigor will be gone and it will be very lively. i suppose the yellow painted apartment is the first starter …
    for this approach i love elemental’s and aravena’s courage.

  11. Thumb up Thumb down 0

    The presentation here would make more sense if it comprised an ecomomic appraisal, to explain the construction cost of these “1/2 homes” in comparison to just building finished, low cost units for social rent or state-assisted purchase. It would also be interesting to hear a cultural/demographic argument for making people self-build. This process obvioulsy rules out a huge percentage of the population as tenants/home owners if you are unable to build yourself or pay for the extension. Also, if houses are designed for social tenants, likelyhood is higher than average that tenants will be old, disabled or otherwise challenged in which case the mighty staircase leading to your front door could prove insurmountable… I like the self-build idea taken from 60s experimental architecture, but it should not be done for its aesthetics rather for its economic & social value.

    • Thumb up Thumb down 0

      @niko
      I agree with you – the self-build idea should not be done for its aesthetics and I think that’s precisely what we have here – a project with a solid economic and social reasoning. At first I thought the authors were after getting an aesthetic effect from combining the controlled design done by the architect with the looser, more spontaneous design done by each inhabitant. Although this might be a part of their intentions, their primary concerns seem to be financial and social. Here’s a quote from their expose:
      “The commission to develop this middle class neighborhood with the financing of US$20,000 per dwelling (almost double the funds we had for the housing projects built by Elemental in Chile). However, the construction standards and building codes significantly raise the construction costs. In this case, it was pertinent to use the strategy of investing state resources to build “the difficult half” of the home, especially given the capacity do-it-yourself building observed in Mexico, ensuring a promising future for the expansions.”
      As you said, not a new idea, but a great one, nevertheless.

  12. Thumb up Thumb down 0

    I’m from Monterrey. The people this project is designed for live barely above the poverty line. This is GREAT, because it is also designed to add to it in the future, if needed, if possible.

  13. Thumb up Thumb down 0

    The Housing Institute of Nuevo Leon in colaboration with the architecture firm ELEMENTAL, have done the first progresive vertical housing complex in the country. This Project is an example that is possible to realize a more dense prototype of social housing instead of the usual individual plot that Mexico´s social housing projects is used to. Congratulations to the Housing Institute for pursuing this kind of ideas, and also to the ELEMENTAL firm because it seems that they fully understand the context of Monterrey.

  14. Thumb up Thumb down 0

    I’d really like to see some photos of what it looks like now, to see if the idea did in fact work… It is a great idea!

  15. Thumb up Thumb down 0

    I do not know whether it’s just me or if perhaps everyone else experiencing issues with your blog.
    It looks like some of the written text within your posts are running
    off the screen. Can someone else please comment
    and let me know if this is happening to them
    too? This might be a issue with my web browser because I’ve had this happen before.
    Thanks

Share your thoughts