The Berg: The biggest artificial mountain in the world

By — Filed under: Landscape , , ,
 
© The Berg

© The Berg

German architect has projected a new and visionary landmark in . He plans to build a mountain of 1,000 meters high called “The Berg”, which would become a never-before-seen tourist destination in the German capital city. Seen at Plataforma Arquitectura. More images and description after the break.

© The Berg

© The Berg

The objective is to create a natural habitat for the mountain’s wildlife and at the same time, become a recreation space for everyone in the city. “The Berg” would take the place of the Tempelhof Airport, a space currently under discussion. Surprisingly, there’s a big group supporting “The Berg” and people are pressing to get the approval and financing of the project.

© The Berg

© The Berg

The Berg Manifesto:

While big and wealthy cities in many parts of the world challenge the limits of possibility by building gigantic hotels with fancy shapes, erecting sky-high offce towers or constructing hovering philharmonic temples, Berlin sets up a decent mountain. Its peak exceeds 1000 metres and is covered with snow from September to March…

Hamburg, as stiff as fat, turns green with envy, rich and once proud Munich starts to feel ashamed of its distant Alp-panorama and planners of the Middle-East, experienced in taking the spell off any kind of architectural utopia immediately design authentic copies of the iconic Berlin-Mountain. Tempelhof no longer only is on Berliners’ minds: People come in focks to – not to see the mountain. Thus,

Come and see The Berg!

© The Berg

© The Berg

© The Berg

© The Berg

© The Berg

© The Berg

© The Berg

© The Berg

© The Berg

© The Berg

© The Berg

© The Berg

 
 
Thumb up Thumb down 0
shreyank says:

exciting… hope it doesn;t have a butterfly effect… !

 
# November 12, 2009 at 11:37
Thumb up Thumb down 0
panza says:

crazy, extremly expensive but good: rather build an artificial mountain with resort, than devastate natural beauty with resorts. and you can have best looking high rise buildings, a mountain, even a fake one looks better, more…natural :)

 
# November 12, 2009 at 11:39
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    says:

    yeap, and from where is going to come all the resources to build it?

    – Nature

     
    # November 12, 2009 at 20:39
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      Steven says:

      from litter.

      and/or you take some woodless unused earth put it on “the berg” and after that you can fill the big hole with water and got a nice lake too…

       
      # November 13, 2009 at 08:40
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      borki says:

      That’s why this project is soo not German! A real German worth his leiderhosen would make a big manly VOLCANO instead!!! Just engineer some wild boring device to drill to the middle of the earth and bring magma to the surface and it would create itself! And think of all the geothermal heating this would create! The whole region could live off of that for centuries and we wouldn’t have to bother the Middle East at all!! Heck, I’d be willing to bet the creator might even get himself a Nobel or two for bringing about peace and what not.

       
      # November 15, 2009 at 17:11
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    ben says:

    If you go to google maps type in Tempelhof Berlin that is a fake mountain but you are right it does look more natural.

     
    # March 19, 2010 at 20:26
Thumb up Thumb down 0
OMG says:

architecture…?????????????

 
# November 12, 2009 at 11:40
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    MS says:

    I find it really sad when people have such restricted views of what constitutes architecture. Why wouldn’t this be architecture?

     
    # November 12, 2009 at 16:51
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      jason says:

      I guess it could be considered so. So could Disneyland.

      As someone currently studying architecture though, I hope not. I want to hope that I can come out working on things that take natural, cultural, and environmental factors ALL into consideration.

      Building a mountain that had no geologic or geographic will to be there is more some kitschy gimmick, like a mall or amusement park, that I find more the influence of developer than most people I meet studying in an architecture program.

      Though I have heard it’s hard to make a living and we often become the whores of this influence and sell our souls in order to do so.

      Architecture means different things to different people, but this is not what it means to me.

       
      # November 12, 2009 at 19:19
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    jons says:

    it is called landscape architecture :P

     
    # November 13, 2009 at 03:54
Thumb up Thumb down 0
ygogolak says:

I’ve seen this around a lot lately, but I have not seen any info on how it could be constructed?

 
# November 12, 2009 at 11:42
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    citysymphony says:

    Soil? Stones? …

    hm landscape architecture maybe …
    but more like … playing god?

     
    # November 12, 2009 at 11:54
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      Franklin says:

      playing god?

      couldn’t you say the same about any architect, scientist, artist, or creative person?

       
      # November 17, 2009 at 21:49
Thumb up Thumb down 0
CMO ARCH says:

This is retarded and isn’t architecture by the way…I would never go to Berlin because they have an artificial mountain. I’d go if they continued making good arcitecture

 
# November 12, 2009 at 11:43
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    HW says:

    Like most conceptual art pieces, I looked at this and wondered why noone had thought of it before. Its simple and crazy-genious. If its a constructed environment, I’d have to argue its in the realm of architecture.

    As for being retarded, well… It would impact the micro-climate, and we could discuss that endlessly. For marketting and bringing people to the city, I can’t think of anything that would work better, whether its a good design or not. Something this crazy would even be on Oprah. Its revolutionary!

     
    # November 12, 2009 at 12:07
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      T.Nowicki says:

      nobody? I did

       
      # November 12, 2009 at 13:36
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      jason says:

      where would you differentiate between an architect and an engineer then? Both architect and engineer could make a “constructed environment”.

       
      # November 12, 2009 at 19:24
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      jason says:

      conceptual art? What?

      This has been done before for one thing, in the form of the Matterhorn at Disneyland. So it’s not exactly like it’s a new “concept”.

       
      # November 13, 2009 at 01:04
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    A says:

    You are a fool. Try and begin to understand the way this project is commenting on the nature of the competition.

     
    # April 30, 2010 at 11:48
Thumb up Thumb down 0
DP says:

Wood, build with wood please!!!!

 
# November 12, 2009 at 11:56
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Claus says:

Berlin already has an artificial mountain, its called “Humboldthöhe” and it is located in “Volkspark Humboldthain”. It is made out of the destroyed Buildings from WW2, and covered with Vegetation. Ok, it’s only 85 m high, but it covers 1.6 million m³ of debris and it wasn’t there before 1945.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 12:08
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Claus says:

    Ok, after some minutes i understood the project. I like it. Reminds my of “Hurz”.

     
    # November 12, 2009 at 12:26
Thumb up Thumb down 0
katemonster says:

I don’t know about ridiculous. It’s different certainly, but people travel to fredricksburg just for enchanted rock.

It may not be architecture in the traditional sense, but it is design and in a world where nature is being traded for buildings, it’s refreshing that someone would make an attempt to bring a little nature back into the world instead of another airport.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 12:19
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Chris says:

Now, put a roller coaster through that mountain and you’ve got something.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 12:50
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    aufi says:

    yeah i would love to ride a roller coaster that stretch around the mountain and through it!..

     
    # November 12, 2009 at 23:25
Thumb up Thumb down 0
jornvorn says:

I say if you make an artificial mountain, make it look en work artificial. You’ll be a poor man trying to imitate a thing that can only be produced by nature.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 13:12
Thumb up Thumb down 0
WT EFF!!! says:

Might as well put some big ears on it, call it Mikey Mountain then have old Walt’s boys build a monorail through it…..just because something is built doesn’t means it’s architecture…big difference between architecture and building…or mountaining in this case.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 13:20
Thumb up Thumb down 0
theChavacano says:

Mmh is this the future, building nature? But what for is already there

 
# November 12, 2009 at 13:40
Thumb up Thumb down 0
theChavacano says:

A park wouldn´t be enough?

 
# November 12, 2009 at 13:42
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Virginia says:

    you’re right

     
    # November 18, 2009 at 10:04
Thumb up Thumb down 0
jh says:

Setting aside issues of originality and what not, let’s get down to brass tacks. How much landscape and habitat will they have to destroy elsewhere to make this fake mountain in Berlin? Where’s the 1000 meter deep hole going to be when this project is completed? How much fuel is it going to take to transport the raw material to the site? Making a new mountain is perhaps the most destructive thing I can think of short of dropping a nuclear bomb.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 13:54
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    PBB says:

    The 1000m hole could create a new artificial lake on the other side of the city… Perfect!!!

     
    # November 12, 2009 at 19:09
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      QCC says:

      Great idea!

       
      # November 12, 2009 at 23:47
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    jons says:

    they won’t necessarily have to destroy anything – take all the rubble from the construction and demolition sites, it will definitely take some time though

     
    # November 13, 2009 at 07:47
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Rahul J says:

extremely freaked out but good too… intresting

 
# November 12, 2009 at 13:57
Thumb up Thumb down 0
luiz felipe says:

interesting. but, is that really important for the city? how expensive it would be? It’s nice to think that we can build a maountain, but anyway, I think a park would be enough too..

 
# November 12, 2009 at 14:31
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Ardian Zeqiri says:

    I’d have to agree with what your saying. I believe that a mountain being built in Berlin is just as bad as when a little child has homework to do and yet does something else, what i mean is why not take all that money since it will be a HUUUGE amount, and help those who can’t even feed their own children. Its a shame that us humans dont share a common decency when it comes to other humans in need.

     
    # November 15, 2009 at 21:48
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Jorge Mejia says:

I wonder if tourists will rather visit the humongous hole, left where all the rocks and soil will be take from to build this thing!

 
# November 12, 2009 at 15:00
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Paco morales says:

Ok…here is the deal…GRAB a mountain…a little photoshop in it, put some animals, a rollercoaster, a little snow and most important “human scale”

there is you project…you can DIY in your own city …all you need is a mountain…there must be like…uhm…150 million all over the world.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 15:13
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    panza says:

    so what. good ideas don§t have to be difficult. in fact. all the genial ideas are primitive – its a mountain. thats it – no design, no complicated stuff, just a mountain. and it looks the best, serves the best. And I cant imagine a better way to deal with nature.

    theres just too much people for the nature, so its logical, that if we want more nature, we must make own own.

    its better to destroy artificial nature than the real one.

    and a city is one big piece of artificiality. why not artificial nature?

     
    # November 12, 2009 at 17:54
Thumb up Thumb down 0
archilocus says:

How ironic… destroying nature to make city, and then destroying city (and nature?) to make artificial nature again… and we’re all, including me, crazy enough to think this could work.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 15:28
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Wargo says:

Archinature…

 
# November 12, 2009 at 15:32
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    theChavacano says:

    a new concept hehe :)

     
    # November 12, 2009 at 16:26
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Felipe Goes says:

man re-creates nature. Very interesting idea !

 
# November 12, 2009 at 15:35
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Hunter says:

I HOPE THIS IS A JOKE.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 15:50
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Dan says:

its a very funny joke, I love the description “Hamburg, as stiff as fat” hahaha

 
# November 12, 2009 at 16:10
Thumb up Thumb down 0
kevin says:

that’s a shame…

 
# November 12, 2009 at 16:16
Thumb up Thumb down 0
thomas says:

The problem CMO arch is that you may be completely right in your statement but nobody will accept a single statement saying what architecture really is nowaday. So I would say society would call architecture anything that define itself as such.
Therefore, it is in architecture. It is undoubedtly influenced by a certain history of architecture, probably the family of projects of Petena, archizoom, site, archigram and such (that you may or may not consider as being architecture).
And I must say I would go to Berlin to see that even more often that I already love to go there. However, i don’t think it is possible to build it as it is shown…

 
# November 12, 2009 at 16:44
Thumb up Thumb down 0
lanois says:

“The objective is to create a natural habitat for the mountain’s wildlife and at the same time, become a recreation space for everyone in the city”

Help me understand the expendature of natural and economic resources to build a faux nature. This is silly. I will always be more interested in visiting Germany (or anywhere else for that matter) for its authenticity. In Germany’s case its history, its culture, and natural settings.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 17:23
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    panza says:

    las vegas is not authentic at all. disneyland neither. and thats the best place in the world. its surreality is the THING that makes it an unique experience. That surreal genius loci – you know its not true, but it looks like that – like a fairytale. I cant imagine a better place to go

     
    # November 12, 2009 at 18:00
Thumb up Thumb down 0
thomas says:

I wander if there is such thing as authenticity that would define any national identity anymore. If i think about the recent celebration events of the fall of the wall, I see a domino likke sculpture falling, a Bon Jovi concert … I’m still searching for the authenticity. And i’m not even talking about architecture there. I don’t think this disparition of authenticity is specific to Germany as a matter of fact, since national identity as been a big political topic everywhere in Europe for the past 20 ears at least. This project is made to be polemical and to raise such topics. that what makes it real.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 17:44
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    panza says:

    even non – authenticity can be authentic – like Las Vegas – its that unauthentic and surreal, that it is authentic in its original way and definetly has a genius loci.

    So could this mountain have. It is taht big, that out of context, taht surreal, that it is fantastic and could become a part of a culture.

    in fact – all architecture is not authentic – it is an artificial shelter – an artificial modern cave. But we make it authentic, because we bring some spririt – piece of us, an artistic expression – thats authentic. and the idea behind this is that simple and pure that it is definetly authentic – it is not a bulding that tries to look like a mountain (thats not very authentic, sorry BIG). it IS a mountain.

     
    # November 12, 2009 at 18:07
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Matej Gaser says:

I think it would be more likely that they would demolish a mountain like this if it would exist from the begining for making space for buildings as making one.

On the other I think its quite interesting.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 18:01
Thumb up Thumb down 0
MiKe Mecanics says:

Not crazy at all, just worrying…

 
# November 12, 2009 at 20:15
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Patrick says:

Gosh yeah, thats a pretty good joke. Talk about parody.

A recently overheard conversation between Berlin politicians:

German 1: Hey, what should we do with that airport that closed?
German 2: Gee, I don’t know, just let it sit there I guess.
German 1: Well, what if we build a mountain there? Ha! a mountain in the center of Berlin! Hilarious!
German 2: Hahaha, that would be incredibly stupid. But funny!

At least I hope thats how it went. Maybe, in the end, this will get built, and then who will the joke be on?

 
# November 12, 2009 at 20:24
Thumb up Thumb down 0
WebsterG says:

I’m sure we could find an extra 1000 meter mountain in Alaska. Could let them have it for, say, half a trillion dollars, and deliver it for, oh, another half a trillion dollars.
Jobs + Deficit reduction all in one neat package, tada!

 
# November 12, 2009 at 20:30
Thumb up Thumb down 0
ryan says:

wow. interesting. i would say it is in fact architecture, however….

i love berlin. I would not want anything to have that much of an unpredictable impact on berlin.

i mean its fake anyway

 
# November 12, 2009 at 20:56
Thumb up Thumb down 0
ryan says:

i hope people understand that the design must be a sort of projected sociological experiment, not a real construct….therefore who cares how it would be possible.

It is perhaps an exaggeration that makes us consider the impacts of architecture.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 20:59
Thumb up Thumb down 0
eazup says:

this looks very similar to cathedral peak in the high sierra’s of california

http://www.summitpost.org/view_object.php?object_id=44574

if you’re going to build a mountain, at least build one that doesn’t exist

 
# November 12, 2009 at 21:04
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    lh says:

    Yeah… great point that…

     
    # November 12, 2009 at 21:19
Thumb up Thumb down 0
mzlxy says:

i would say please do it.
to change the topography can create more than a resort for the people live in urban on a plain. somehow it can help to release the pressure of living in such density.
romantically , it bring back “sublime”

 
# November 12, 2009 at 21:26
Thumb up Thumb down 0
mzlxy says:

but will the system of animals work according to his drawing? it’s a more complicated thing than that i think

 
# November 12, 2009 at 21:31
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Architist says:

This project is very much a dream idea. Such make it economily expensive. Has an architecture student, I think it is a great idea and ridiculous at the same time. Why should we build a mountain and call it architecture?
I bet Germany gat loads of mountainous areas whereby people such as tourist can visit. But this??????

 
# November 13, 2009 at 00:08
Thumb up Thumb down 0
YAUHO says:

JEAN NOUVEL DID SOMETHING LIKE THAT, THOUGH MUCH SMALLER I GUESS, WITH ACCOMODATION INSIDE

 
# November 13, 2009 at 00:09
Thumb up Thumb down 0
amr says:

This guy has just solved the problem of what to do with the world’s garbage for the next 20 years……

 
# November 13, 2009 at 01:39
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    gde says:

    @ amr….. good comment and a funy too… yup he just solved the garbage probelm … hahahahaha… lol *can’t stop laughing*

     
    # November 13, 2009 at 02:49
Thumb up Thumb down 0
alessandropeli says:

I think this project is very pretentious and expensive .. I hope that is within an ‘urban planning perspective, covering not only the object end in itself but that it represents the’ opening words to a re-naturalization of the city! function which is The Berg may be questionable .. I wonder if the animals and vegetation to be established at a certain price does not suffer damage from other pollution concentrations of ‘air of a city like Berlin!
cmq think it’s a great challenge and is perhaps what we need to stir the souls dozing on topics such as’ environment!

 
# November 13, 2009 at 04:19
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Howard Roark says:

It amazes me how bent out of shape people get over an interesting and witty proposal.

 
# November 13, 2009 at 05:07
Thumb up Thumb down 0
crazykingkong says:

someone heard my prayers … I’m packing to head to the “Magic Mountain” … my dream comes true, hehehe … living the wild! uhh, uppps, it’s architecture? sorry

 
# November 13, 2009 at 05:30
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Tuomas says:

    This IS architecture in sense of designing space.

    This would be wonderfully lunatic but yet, marvellous!

    – architect -

     
    # November 13, 2009 at 07:15
Thumb up Thumb down 0
punkdaft says:

I just want to put in that hungarian artist Antal Lakner has done the same project and idea in 1999, 10 years before Jakob Tigges.
It was called: ‘Bundesberg’
http://www.nol.hu/kep/97215

Here is an animation about ‘Bundesberg’ from 2005:
http://www.3gstudio.hu/hu/animacio-referencia/bundesberg-berlin-animacio-2005.html

 
# November 13, 2009 at 05:58
Thumb up Thumb down 0
jean grey says:

jason go read your rem!

 
# November 13, 2009 at 11:00
Thumb up Thumb down 0
roy says:

This had happened in ancient China for many times!!

 
# November 13, 2009 at 11:03
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Marco says:

Hilarious. I would hear what a geologist says about this joke…

 
# November 13, 2009 at 14:07
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Ladzono says:

WHY???

 
# November 13, 2009 at 14:48
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Virginia says:

Man has always built monuments and this is another. Is this project seen by the people who will ultimately be paying for the structure, as beneficial? Do they want/ like the idea? It is in their city after all. If it ends up as a monumental cost to the city which cripples the tax payer, and the standard of life less enhanced, then I would question it. However, if it celebrated and indeed provides a quality of life then surely it can only be a good thing. Art has always mimicked nature.
It does not matter who has done what before, the fact is if it works.. celebrate … but thorough homework first or it could cripple. Extremely brave.

 
# November 13, 2009 at 14:51
Thumb up Thumb down 0
md says:

yawn

 
# November 13, 2009 at 23:18
Thumb up Thumb down 0
der franzi says:

please build a lot of them, also in munich, especially munich, and add some stanglwirt replicas. hope that will stop these annoying germans from travelling to austria and occupying our mountains.
germans are rated top of the worst behaving tourists. they come here and tell the locals how to behave and our politicians stick their heads up their backside looking for cheap euros instead of trying to create real jobs here. what a sell-out.
go artificcial mountains!

 
# November 14, 2009 at 05:43
Thumb up Thumb down 0
tsaB says:

There is an interesting point here,

when there is no empty space to build , we build scyscrapers
when there is no empty space to find nature, we build mountains…

 
# November 14, 2009 at 14:03
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Clayton says:

Landslides, water run off, blocking out the sun to certain parts of the city, sourcing all the earth and rock required.

Sounds dumb

 
# November 15, 2009 at 01:14
Thumb up Thumb down 0
klemen says:

mislim da to ni primerno in da se takoj ukinejo takšne stvari lp

 
# November 15, 2009 at 15:56
Thumb up Thumb down 0
eunice says:

isn’t it the tower of babel?

well, nature have been crying out loud because of human… what now?

 
# November 16, 2009 at 00:06
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Pesi says:

This is bulls*%t…some people just don’t know where to put their money…I doubt the architect even heard of Africa,and how many hungry people are there…

 
# November 19, 2009 at 05:30
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    punkdaft says:

    Bono-Bono! :)

     
    # November 24, 2009 at 11:19
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    A says:

    This is a speculative project, there is no intention from the architect for this to be actually built. It’s a critical view of the competitions which it was submitted for. Keep your naive hollow ideas to yourself.

     
    # April 30, 2010 at 11:51
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Dietrich T. says:

The Berg: http://bit.ly/4intbO – nice, don't know whether Berlin's ready though.

 
# November 23, 2009 at 12:53
Thumb up Thumb down 0
George King says:

Jakob Tigges has projected a new landmark in Berlin. He plans 2 build a mountain of 1,000 meters high called “The Berg” http://bit.ly/19b4YM

 
# November 24, 2009 at 17:47
Thumb up Thumb down 0

Nice for next years xmas! 2 Great things combined: Snowboarding and partyparty in Berllin. http://bit.ly/yusQh

 
# November 27, 2009 at 08:15
Thumb up Thumb down 0
malinoski says:

Ou Berg em alemão, uma piada interna de uma cidade inteira. http://tinyurl.com/ybhhogu / http://www.the-berg.de/

 
# November 27, 2009 at 09:16
Thumb up Thumb down 0
dog_race says:

http://tinyurl.com/ybhhogu
The Berg: The biggest artificial mountain in the world | ArchDaily

 
# November 28, 2009 at 17:30
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Олєх says:

http://www.archdaily.com/40755/the-berg-the-biggest-artificial-mountain-in-the-world/ пост-архитектура

 
# December 5, 2009 at 19:42
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Elmar says:

I just did some small calculations:
With a diameter of 1500m it would have a volume of 7,000,000,000 m3
with an average truck that can load 50 m3 a time.
They would need 100000 trucks a day and even than it would take them 5 years to complete this.

So better start building the road to the site -.-

 
# December 30, 2009 at 17:54
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Christian says:

hey.. Can you build a similar mountain in Denmark, please ? We could use some diversion from the flatt land. :P

 
# February 23, 2010 at 08:55
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Jacob Riis says:

    In Denmark they have built some artificial “mountains” in Aarhus ( second largest city in Denmark ) http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasle_Bakker. The Hasle Bakker is very small compared to the Berg. ( 128 m high )

    I’ve been up there and there is quite a view. In fine weather you can see the “Himmelbjerget”

     
    # May 15, 2010 at 15:04
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Ryan Sisson says:

Artifical mountains? Check. http://bit.ly/yusQh

 
# March 11, 2010 at 20:41
Thumb up Thumb down 0

Reading: "The Berg: The biggest artificial mountain in the world | ArchDaily"( http://twitthis.com/nsmimh )

 
# April 3, 2010 at 18:41
Thumb up Thumb down 0

Reading: "The Berg: The biggest artificial mountain in the world | ArchDaily"( http://twitthis.com/nsmimh )

 
# April 18, 2010 at 05:45
Thumb up Thumb down 0
SUNGMIN LEE says:

Reading: "The Berg: The biggest artificial mountain in the world | ArchDaily"( http://twitthis.com/nsmimh )

 
# May 5, 2010 at 20:18
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Ezra Borroel says:

What can I say, this is a very nice website!

 
# November 12, 2010 at 10:07
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Claus Ørum says:

before doing anything irrational,check out this page:https://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/group.php?gid=11436463537, and be sure to ask for permission,cause its gonna be a total rip off of a real mountain!!

 
# May 28, 2011 at 08:45
Thumb up Thumb down 0

I pray to God that this actually happens. If any where in the world will fund and allow this sort of project, it would be Berlin. Summer time chilling with goats on the Berg. YES PLEASE!

 
# January 17, 2012 at 08:19
Thumb up Thumb down 0

3:26 AM Sep 24th

Reading: "The Berg: The biggest artificial mountain in the world | ArchDaily"( http://twitthis.com/nsmimh )

Thumb up Thumb down 0

7:40 AM Nov 12th

TN

:D Those crazy germans! Nemtii vor să-și planteze un munte artificial în pupul Berlinului http://bit.ly/yusQh

Thumb up Thumb down 0

3:25 PM Nov 12th

Cred ca nemtii sunt organizati pentru ca privesc totul ca pe un joc ;D The Berg: The biggest artificial mountain http://t.co/mHp7c9U

Thumb up Thumb down 0

9:06 AM Nov 13th

The Berg: The biggest artificial mountain in the world | ArchDaily http://t.co/aLwgg6C via @archdaily

Thumb up Thumb down 0

3:00 AM Nov 19th

some old news: The Berg – the biggest artificial mountain in the world http://ht.ly/3chjg

Thumb up Thumb down 0

4:57 PM Aug 6th

@thijszonneveld http://t.co/6blGB2f misschien moet je die architect even bellen, vragen of hij een twee keer zo hoge wil ontwerpen voor je

Thumb up Thumb down 0

10:38 AM Aug 30th

Hoezo nieuw idee om een kunstmatige berg te bouwen? Dit is een plan uit Berlijn: http://t.co/qa2CPlJ

Thumb up Thumb down 0

9:34 PM Sep 2nd

@thijszonneveld Thijs, ken je dit project: http://t.co/VvLJLQD ? Ziet er goed uit, maar is n beetje laag die Duitse berg! :) #diebergkomter

Thumb up Thumb down 0

7:45 AM Sep 25th

The Berg: The biggest artificial mountain in the world | ArchDaily http://t.co/XbQDw0Je via @archdaily

Thumb up Thumb down 0

3:38 PM Dec 15th

Germans are sick! http://t.co/ByB0xmv4

Thumb up Thumb down 0

3:43 PM Dec 15th

Plans unveiled to build a man-made mountain in Berlin, "The Berg" http://t.co/lp4pU8cS

Thumb up Thumb down 0

4:20 PM Dec 15th

Did somebody say mountain? In Berlin!? http://t.co/2UlvNpL5 #notbad

Thumb up Thumb down 0

5:12 PM Dec 15th

Did somebody say mountain? In Berlin!? http://t.co/2UlvNpL5 #notbad

Leave a Reply »

 

Latest Comments »

very attractive great construction.[+]
Very attractive great job.[+]
I love buildings of this proportion. May be I should go...[+]
how does the tall one stay up?[+]
Oompa Lumpa + Violet Beauregarde...[+]

Upcoming Architecture Events »

got events? invite us! click here

Architecture Books & Magazines »

eVolo Skyscrapers

eVolo Skyscrapers

We recently received one of the limited editions (n=500) of eVolo Skycrapers. At 1224 pages (9″ x 11.5″ x 2.5″), it is less of a coffee table book than it is an actual table.  The book grew out of…

 

Encyclopedia of Detail in Contemporary Residential Architecture

Encyclopedia of Detail in Contemporary Residential Architecture

French novelist Gustave Flaubert’s expression, “le bon Dieu est le détail” became a cliché for one reason, it is true. God does dwell in the details, and well done details are often the difference between a mundane building and…

 

Event: Tom Kundig and Mark Rozzo – Architectural Explorations in Books, a conversation presented by New York Public Library

Photo by Tom Bies | Courtesy of OSKA Architects

[ January 25, 2012; 18:00 to 20:00. ] Tomorrow, the New York Public Library will be hosting a talk between architect Tom Kundig of Olson Kundig Architects and Town & Country Executive Editor Mark Rozzo that will discuss “the role of place, nature, materials and craft in creating Kundig’s bold and…

 

Our partners »

AD on iPad via Pulse

Browse by date »

Browse by category »

Friends »