First Hand on the Highline
The New York Highline, a project by James Corner Field Operations with the collaboration of Diller Scofidio + Renfro has been open to the public for a few weeks (as we reported previously on AD) and as a New Yorker who has waited patiently for the project to finish, I was anxious to stroll along the latest addition in Manhattan. The visit was a completely new way to experience the city. Just the idea of observing Manhattan by walking above (and through) it, rather than being an actual part of it, made the Highline a project one must encounter to feel what the space can offer.
More about some impressions after a visit to the Highline and more pictures after the break.
Entering on Gansevoort Street, I was greeted by papers being thrust in my hand as protesters quickly explained that the wood on the Highline was taken from an endangered Amazon rain forest. The protestors were trying to prevent the remaining parts of the project from being made with this material and thus tried to raise awareness by handing out fliers and talking to those about to walk up the main stairs. It is interesting to note that the Highline’s official website refutes these attacks by explaining, “The Ipe wood used on the High Line was chosen for its longevity and durability, and taken from a managed forest certified by the Forest Stewardship Council, which is recognized for creating and enforcing the world’s strongest standards for forest management. FSC membership requires conservation of biological diversity, water resources, soils, and fragile ecosystems and landscapes to maintain the integrity of the forest and discourage exploitative deforestation.”
After passing through the protesters, the main entrance stands invitingly and allows light to channel down the stairway. As I walked up this great entrance, I couldn’t rid my mind of how unfair it is that a handicapped person would never be able to experience this space (much farther down the line, on 16th Street, a small glass elevator is haphazardly plopped on the side of the line). Once up the stairs, the chaotic streets seem to fade away as the overgrown landscape dominates the setting. The perfectly arranged grass and flowers, growing between and over the tracks, creates patterns of varying heights, colors and textures. The original tracks, complete with their old writing and graffiti work, show that the architects truly embraced the past and incorporated it into its present condition. The compositional quality of the landscape transforms the whole atmosphere making it entirely different from the portion just down a few stairs.
The beginning parts of the Highline are beautifully designed. The overall aesthetic is very simple and yet, flexible as a variety of benches and seating are all different and yet all seem to belong. Handrails are engraved with the streets numbers, providing a map to those walking along. And, the walk provides perfect views of the Empire State Building, the Hudson River and Gehry’s IAC Headquarters. On the downside, there are also spectacular views into people’s apartments, galleries and conference rooms, as well as the exposed, and unappealing, meatpacking factories and rundown buildings. People walking along the line can come face to face with those changing their infant or interviewing their newest prospect. In addition, large billboards are angled directly toward those on the Highline. It would be a shame if the Highline became an advertising haven constantly annoyning those walking with the latest fashions or technologies.
Approaching one bend in the Highline, there is an amphitheatre condition with broad stairs allowing people to sunbath, read, or be at their leisure. The amphitheatre is stepped down toward the street, so those sitting are confronted by a large glass panel that focuses on the taxis whizzing by and the people dining on the sidewalk. Although the idea to isolate a busy Manhattan street is very enticing, it is a lot like DS + R’s tactic for their Institute of Contemporary Art in Boston. Rather than isolating the water as in Boston, the architects have merely flopped the city for the water to copy the effect.
It is true that some pieces of the Highline are still very much under construction. Some stair cases are far from being close to the elegant main entrance and the area under the residential tower needs some work, but all will come together in time. There is so much potential for the surrounding areas and within a few years, the area is going to be exponentially more popular than it already is.
The Highline was bustling with life as people enjoyed sitting, lying, reading and walking in this new atmosphere. It is a successful project that highlights New York as much as the actual Highline. It is truly a great treat for anyone.
- Karen Cilento
- Michelle Borth
- Karen Cilento
- Karen Cilento
- Karen Cilento
- Karen Cilento
- Karen Cilento
- Karen Cilento
- Karen Cilento
- Karen Cilento
- Karen Cilento
- Karen Cilento
- Karen Cilento
- Karen Cilento
- Karen Cilento
- Karen Cilento
- Karen Cilento
- Karen Cilento
- Karen Cilento
- Karen Cilento
- Michelle Borth
- Michelle Borth
- Michelle Borth
- Michelle Borth
- Michelle Borth
- Michelle Borth
- Michelle Borth
- Michelle Borth
- Michelle Borth
- Michelle Borth
- Michelle Borth
























































































oh yeah! yeah… humm yeah. uhh!!! yeah! yeahh…
just had an orgasm viewing these pics.
this architecture is hot!
hahaha couldn’t have said it better
I was there too.
Disappointed in the short shrift given to something that architects in my firm (and in my university) are increasingly taking note of: the natural world and the conditions in which our designs leave it.
So i’m somewhat surprised at the snide and intellectually incurious tone struck by this reporter.
To look no further than the Highline’s self-serving statements about the materials being FSC certified. And to ‘get past the protestors’ without reading their literature.
I have the 1/4 page flyer in front of me now (and have yet to hear back from the Highline’s PR flack – is that you?- to the questions they urge we raise).
What is “sustainable” or “green” about using Amazonian hardwood for benches 8,000 miles away?
How does industrially logging a dynamic, biologically diverse rainforest signal concern for or achieve protection of our natural environment?
It would take a reporter one second to google “FSC critique” and find – lo and behold – http://www.fsc-watch.org
I hope archdaily will keep us informed of future real environmentally thoughtful design achievements. Neither the Highline nor this article succeeds.
Dear Maria,
Both sides of the story are presented on the article, on an unbiased way. But we do let you show your point of view. I think that the “snide” tone you mention doesn´t exist in the article, only in your comment. Sorry if we don´t focus completely on it as you expect, but the comments are the opportunity we give our readers to express their views on projects, as you are doing now.
Hellooo Buzzkill
I think Maria makes a valid point. What does Ipe have that some locally harvested hardwood doesn’t? In fact, shipping in wood from half a globe away seems to go against the concept of keeping the High Line in its “natural” state.
got to agree that the “green” labeling is sham… it is well-known the the FSC process is in act counter-productive to its ostensible goals…as architects and designers we have to be serious and sincere… recycled lumber would have been the best, otherwise recycled plastic lumber.. as for cost, the whole things was over $170 million, so if the recycled barn type lumber for example cost a bit more…read somewhere that there were some sweetheart deals from the Ipe suppliers through the politicos that funded the effort with tax payer monies, see:http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2008/04/29/2008-04-29_christine_quinn_gives_your_cash_to_west_.html
juts one of many articles that ought to give some pause, or some chagrin.. or are we so far along that this amazon wood is green and this is how we buy politicians?
…
… glad for those protesters bringing these issues up
These are amazing photos. The High Line is one of my favorite parts of New York. For anyone that hasn’t been able to make it there in person, you can check-out bit.ly/RefreshEverything to take a virtual tour.
On it’s face, tropical wood certified by the Forest Stewardship Council sounds like it could be a good thing. FSC promises that their wood is procured in an “environmentally responsible, socially beneficial, and economically viable way.” But, if you follow the paper trail, you’ll discover that FSC-certified wood is all too often riddled with controversy.
FSC has repeatedly certified wood gutted from ancient, virgin rainforests across the globe, including South America and Africa.
In addition, the FSC has repeatedly turned a blind eye to human rights atrocities associated with forestry operations that they certify. One of the most recent examples occurred this year in Brazil when a nonviolent, popular movement of indigenous people and campesinos rose up against an FSC-certified plantation, which they rightly referred to as a “green desert” because of the way it “destroys local people’s livelihoods and environments.” Despite a violent eviction by military forces these affected communities continue to fight for human and environmental rights.
Simon Counsel, a Founding Member of the Forest Stewardship Council in 1993, became so concerned about the constant erosion of the FSC’s reliability that he went on to found http://www.fsc-watch.org, which seeks to watch dog the FSC and encourage debate about its practices. Counsel states that the FSC has created a “‘race to the bottom’ of certification standards”, alleging that the “FSC really has become the ‘Enron of forestry.’”
Counsell believes that many of the FSC’s drawbacks are due to its tendency to look at each individual logging operation as a separate entity while ignoring the big picture of what industrial logging is doing to rainforest ecology. “Whilst a logging concession might appear to be ’sustainable’ at this small-scale level, the whole development model that accompanies industrial logging concessions might be highly non-sustainable and destructive,” Counsell says.
He continues with examples from the Amazon and Indonesia: “Research in the Amazon has shown that, over a period of years, commercial logging greatly increases the overall propensity of the forest to dry out, burn, and disappear. This happens regardless of whether the logged areas are certified or not.”
More Info: http://rainforestsofnewyork.org/alternatives/fsc-wood-guts-rainforests
It’s a nice project, but i think a little overly-manicured to withstand the test of time in the public space of NYC.
I think DS+R could have a taken a page from FOA in Barcelona on how to make long-lasting public spaces in a 24hour city.
We’ll see how it long the ipe lasts – tagging and vandalism will hit it sooner or later.
recycled plastic lumber lasts 4 times longer, rodney. So life-cycle costs are cheaper too.
My firm’s folks are really surprised at the destructive material choice.
it would be nice to know about “your firm”…..
The arrogance which entitles some people to destroy our tropical rain forests in order to appease an opulent and disconnected sense of beauty will be our end, though it’s not to late to reverse the trend.
The type of Change that Obama is talking about is just this. The awareness that the world is not the playground of the wealthy, to extract resources destructively on whim with no accountability.
The Bush administration could till it’s last dying days never admit to making any errors. This pervasive attitude needs to change throughout government and throughout society in general. It is just this attitude that gets in the way of creating both space and systems which carry the present solutions readily available. The solutions are present and visible. Open your eyes.
The Friends of the High Line can send out a loud message that they committed a grave error in their use of the tropical wood known as Ipe. They could become heros and champions to a greater cause.
As a life time new yorker, I love my public space and the idea that the High Line delivers.
100 years of industrial destruction is enough. Let us do things, and let us do things right.
I remember a competition for the High Line from few years ago. Lots of entries- veeery similar to this one. It was the first edition called- The High Line (NY) call for ideas. Me and my friend have also sent a project with park-like structures etc. I don’t remember who the winner was, but I rememeber that the next stage competition was for the professionals. They didn’t come up with anything more that had been showed before-absolutely nothing new! I do like this idea of highline, but in my opinion a “green stripe” is just not enough
Jim, congratulations, not bad, like the Echinacea!
Cleggy.
genius
2:46 PM Jul 9th
See ArchDaily’s Karen Cilento’s first-hand experience of the High Line in NYC: http://bit.ly/d4c1Z
1:29 PM Dec 23rd
Reading: "First Hand on the Highline | ArchDaily"( http://twitthis.com/5b2r38 )