We’ve built you a better ArchDaily. Learn more and let us know what you think. Send us your feedback »

Does the Shard Need Time?

The disappointment generated by the Shard’s opening laser light show is not so surprising for a project that has been grounded in controversy for over a decade.  Since 2000, when Piano sketched his initial vision upon meeting developer Irvine Sellar, the project has consistently met obstacles such as English Heritage and the financial crash of 2007.   But, the biggest opposition of the tower has been its height.  English Heritage claimed that the tower, formerly known as London Bridge Tower, would “tear through historic London like a shard of glass” (ironically, coining the new name of the tower), and Piano counters that, “The best architecture takes time to be understood…I would prefer people to judge it not now. Judge it in 10 years’ time.” Leading us to wonder…does the Shard simply need time to be fully appreciated?

Cite:Karen Cilento. "Does the Shard Need Time?" 09 Jul 2012. ArchDaily. Accessed . <http://www.archdaily.com/252837/does-the-shard-need-time/>