the world's most visited architecture website
i

Sign up now and start saving and organizing your favorite architecture projects and photos

Sign up now to save and organize your favorite architecture projects

i

Find the most inspiring products for your projects in our Product Catalog.

Find the most inspiring products in our Product Catalog.

i

Get the ArchDaily Chrome Extension and be inspired with every new tab. Install here »

i

All over the world, architects are finding cool ways to re-use run-down old buildings. Click here to see the best in Refurbishment Architecture.

Want to see the coolest refurbishment projects? Click here.

i

Immerse yourself in inspiring buildings with our selection of 360 videos. Click here.

See our immersive, inspiring 360 videos. Click here.

All
Projects
Products
Events
Competitions
Navigate articles using your keyboard
  1. ArchDaily
  2. News
  3. 9 of the Most Bizarre and Forward-Thinking Radical Architecture Groups of the 60s and 70s

9 of the Most Bizarre and Forward-Thinking Radical Architecture Groups of the 60s and 70s

9 of the Most Bizarre and Forward-Thinking Radical Architecture Groups of the 60s and 70s
9 of the Most Bizarre and Forward-Thinking Radical Architecture Groups of the 60s and 70s

The first moon landing, widespread anti-war protests, Woodstock and the hippies, rural communes and environmentalism, the Berlin Wall, the women’s liberation movement and so much more—the tumultuous decades of the Sixties and Seventies occupy an unforgettable place in history. With injustices openly questioned and radical ideas that set out to unseat existing conventions and practices in various spheres of life, things weren’t any different in the architectural world. 

The grand visions dreamt up by the modernists were soon challenged by utopian experiments from the “anti-architecture” or “radical design” groups of the 1960–70s. Reestablishing architecture as an instrument of political, social, and cultural critique, they drafted bold manifestoes and designs, experimented with collage, music, performance art, furniture, graphic design, zines, installations, events, and exhibitions. While certain individuals from this era like Cedric Price, Hans Hollein, and Yona Friedman remain important to the realm of the radical and the unbuilt, the revolutionary spirit of these decades also saw the birth of various young collectives. For eccentricity at its very best, read on for a (by no means exhaustive) list of some groups who dared to question, poke, expand, rebel against, disrupt and redefine architecture in the 60s and 70s.

Ant Farm (San Francisco, USA)

Slide showing Ant Farm's design for Convention City, which was displayed by SFMoMA as part of their 2012 exhibition "<a href='http://www.archdaily.com/224032/sfmoma-exhibit-the-utopian-impulse-buckminster-fuller-and-the-bay-area'>The Utopian Impulse: Buckminster Fuller and the Bay Area</a>". Image © Ant Farm
Slide showing Ant Farm's design for Convention City, which was displayed by SFMoMA as part of their 2012 exhibition "The Utopian Impulse: Buckminster Fuller and the Bay Area". Image © Ant Farm

Inspired by the counter-culture milieu of the Bay Area, Chip Lord and Doug Michels founded Ant Farm in 1968. While the group’s initial focus was on reforming architectural education, their work soon expanded into a tool for deeper introspection and critique propelled particularly by the Brutalist architecture of Louis Kahn and Paul Rudolph. Through performances, installations, videos, manifestos and agitprop events replete with their own inflatable structures, they celebrated flexibility and lightness; these ideas eventually culminated in the design of The House of the Century.

Subsequent projects, like the famous Cadillac Ranch Show, Media Burn and Dolphin Embassy, also served as a tongue-in-cheek comment on mass consumption, production and the resulting environmental depreciation. As if all this was not enough to satisfy the cheeky spirits of the duo, a customized Chevy called Media Van accompanied them throughout their travels across the United States.

Archigram (UK)

Plug-In City. Image © Peter Cook
Plug-In City. Image © Peter Cook

Megastructures that walk on spindly legs, wearable dwellings, underwater cities, inflatable villages, do-it-yourself building kits, pills that induce fantastical architectural visions, and so much more—this group of architects (Peter Cook, David Greene, Mike Webb, Warren Chalk, Dennis Crompton, Ron Herron) is undoubtedly the first that comes to mind when one pairs the word “radical” with “architecture.”

Instant City. Image © Peter Cook
Instant City. Image © Peter Cook

Incorporating elements from science fiction, comics, advertising imagery, pop-art, poetry, and collage in their work, Archigram upheld the tenets of neo-futurism, mass-consumerism and contemporary technology in post-war Britain. They rejected the modernist straitjacket by spewing out fantastical designs of buildings and cities which were mobile, adaptable, and far more technologically advanced than anything that the modernists had built to that point.

Archizoom Associati (Italy)

Superonda Sofa, 1966. Image Courtesy of Dario Bartolini (Archizoom Associati)
Superonda Sofa, 1966. Image Courtesy of Dario Bartolini (Archizoom Associati)

Best-known for their No-Stop City and their eclectic, kitschy aesthetics that are best recognized in the design of the Safari Chair and the Dream Bed, this Italian design studio playfully critiqued the status-quo using satire, subversion, irony, and exaggeration.

In a joint manifesto signed for a 1961 exhibition Superarchitettura, by Archizoom and Superstudio, they proclaimed: “Superarchitettura is the architecture of superproduction, superconsumption, superinduction to consume, the supermarket, the superman, super gas.” Using sculptural forms, bright colors and “furniture-jokes” like the Mies Chair, the nonconformist group argued for total liberation from, and the “right to go against a reality that lacks meaning... to act, modify, form, and destroy the surrounding environment.”

Cavart (Italy)

Formed in 1973, “Cavart,” meaning “quarry,” was named after the site where the group’s first performance took place: the quarry of the Monte Lonzina near Padua. Often taking over such remote sites on the outskirts of cities, the group mainly operated through seminars, performances, and workshops. The most famous of all was the week-long workshop Culturally Impossible Architecture, which was home to over a hundred participants in 1975, including Will Alsop and Marco Zanini.

Cavart worked tirelessly to do away with bourgeoisie ideals and aesthetics, arguing for a more meaningful relationship between architecture and the environment. Their workshops often resulted in make-shift pop-up towns which were created from scratch in just a few days, with structures made with inexpensive, everyday materials which were easily accessible to all.

Superstudio (Florence)

New-New York, 1969. This drawing was displayed as part of the exhibition "<a href='http://www.archdaily.com/774609/7-early-drawings-by-famous-architects'>Drawing Ambience: Alvin Boyarsky and the Architectural Association</a>" © Superstudio. Image Courtesy of Collection of the Alvin Boyarsky Archive
New-New York, 1969. This drawing was displayed as part of the exhibition "Drawing Ambience: Alvin Boyarsky and the Architectural Association" © Superstudio. Image Courtesy of Collection of the Alvin Boyarsky Archive

The bizarre imagery of Superstudio stands unparalleled in the history of the Radical Design Movement in Italy: a series of hallucinogenic sequences containing massive golden pyramids, city grids stretching towards infinity, metallic pods floating in space, gigantic reflective cubes parked in desolate landscapes, and humans mingling with giant cacti against a backdrop of rocky hills—all strangely reminiscent of the otherworldly visions of Philip K Dick, Isaac Asimov and J G Ballard. Through bold photomontages, illustrations, films, exhibitions and textual proclamations, their influence reached far and wide.

Gruppo UFO

Did all radical architecture groups, then, never actually “build buildings”? Not at all! A few did indeed dabble in (re)designing spaces, more specifically, discotheques or “pipers”, as they were locally known in the 60s. The Italian design group UFO decided to take control of this seemingly “neutral space,” the nightclub, as a ready canvas for experimentation. Taking inspiration from a Disney comic book, Donald Duck and the Magic Hourglass, the group created a strange setting replete with hour-glass shaped furniture, large lanterns and a DJ booth on a flying carpet. Makeshift structures and industrial aesthetics marked the experiments with discotheques in this era, all the while commenting on the sordid state of affairs in the world.

Gruppo 9999

Competition University Of Florence, 1971, <a href='http://www.archdaily.com/428256/ad-interviews-rotor-curators-of-the-oslo-architecture-triennale'>displayed as part of the 2013 Oslo Architecture Triennale</a>. Image © Gruppo 9999
Competition University Of Florence, 1971, displayed as part of the 2013 Oslo Architecture Triennale. Image © Gruppo 9999

In a similar vein, another Italian collective founded in 1967, Gruppo 9999, converted an engine repair workshop into a disco with furnishings made out of washing machine drums and old refrigerator cases, calling it Space Electronic—it became an architecture school by day and a nightclub by night.

Gruppo 9999’s work also brought to the fore their concerns about sustainability and ecology. In the 1971 Mondiale Festival, the second floor of Space Electronic sported a vegetable garden while the ground floor was flooded with water. This garden patch was just a precursor for what was to come—in 1972, Gruppo 9999 won MoMA’s Competition for Young Designers with the proposal for their Vegetable Garden House.

Gruppo Strum (Italy)

Founded in 1971, Gruppo Strum was Giorgio Cerretti, Pietro Derossi, Carlo Gianmarco, Riccardo Rosso and Maurizio Vogliazzo. The meaning of the name’s group roughly translates to “instrumental architecture”, indicative of the optimistic spirit that the group imbibed. Also experimenting with the discotheque format, they created playful, adaptable spaces with a mix of programs: a space for fashion shows and boutiques, music nights and dance.

Gruppo Strum is best remembered for its grass-green Pratone lounge chair, which, much to the delight of many, is back in production by Gufram, the Italian manufacturer of the original chair.

Haus-Rucker-Co (Vienna)

Haus-Rucker-Co's "Ballon für Zwei" was displayed as part of the exhibition "<a href='http://www.archdaily.com/582842/haus-rucker-co-architectural-utopia-reloaded'>Haus-Rucker-Co: Architectural Utopia Reloaded</a> exhibition at Berlin's Haus am Waldsee in 2015. Image © Haus-Rucker-Co, Gerald Zugmann
Haus-Rucker-Co's "Ballon für Zwei" was displayed as part of the exhibition "Haus-Rucker-Co: Architectural Utopia Reloaded exhibition at Berlin's Haus am Waldsee in 2015. Image © Haus-Rucker-Co, Gerald Zugmann

This Viennese collective operating at the junction between architecture, psychology and technology is best remembered not just for its wild proposals for inflatables and parasitic architecture—like the Oase Nr. 7, a spherical pneumatic structure attached to an existing building during Documenta 5, creating a space for contemplation or play—but also the strange breathing devices and helmets like the Mind Expander series. Seeking to play with human perception, these helmets presented a bizarre new reality for those who wore them, heightening their senses and altering their ideas about space.

Haus-Rucker-Co's "Environment Transformers" were displayed as part of the exhibition "<a href='http://www.archdaily.com/582842/haus-rucker-co-architectural-utopia-reloaded'>Haus-Rucker-Co: Architectural Utopia Reloaded</a> exhibition at Berlin's Haus am Waldsee in 2015. Image © Haus-Rucker-Co, Gerald Zugmann
Haus-Rucker-Co's "Environment Transformers" were displayed as part of the exhibition "Haus-Rucker-Co: Architectural Utopia Reloaded exhibition at Berlin's Haus am Waldsee in 2015. Image © Haus-Rucker-Co, Gerald Zugmann

The group also employed the sense of taste in their projects: the notorious Food City I and Food City II invited onlookers to quite literally eat their city—an edible scale-model made of parts of Minneapolis, and later Houston, as well as Central Park.

View the complete gallery

Cite: Zoya Gul Hasan. "9 of the Most Bizarre and Forward-Thinking Radical Architecture Groups of the 60s and 70s" 26 Sep 2017. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/880253/9-of-the-most-bizarre-and-forward-thinking-radical-architecture-groups-of-the-60s-and-70s/> ISSN 0719-8884

九个最怪咖最前卫的激进派建筑团体,50年前他们的设计比你的更异想天开