the world's most visited architecture website
i

Sign up now and start saving and organizing your favorite architecture projects and photos

Sign up now to save and organize your favorite architecture projects

i

Find the most inspiring products for your projects in our Product Catalog.

Find the most inspiring products in our Product Catalog.

i

Get the ArchDaily Chrome Extension and be inspired with every new tab. Install here »

i

All over the world, architects are finding cool ways to re-use run-down old buildings. Click here to see the best in Refurbishment Architecture.

Want to see the coolest refurbishment projects? Click here.

i

Immerse yourself in inspiring buildings with our selection of 360 videos. Click here.

See our immersive, inspiring 360 videos. Click here.

All
Projects
Products
Events
Competitions
Navigate articles using your keyboard
  1. ArchDaily
  2. Articles
  3. Conference Review: "Typology Redux: Revisiting a theoretical framework for new modes of practice"

Conference Review: "Typology Redux: Revisiting a theoretical framework for new modes of practice"

Conference Review: "Typology Redux: Revisiting a theoretical framework for new modes of practice"
Courtesy of Sun-Young Park
Courtesy of Sun-Young Park

Sun-Young Park, an architecture PhD student at Harvard shared with us a review on the Typology Redux Conference at Northeastern University in Boston. Read the complete review after the break.

While the notion of type has waned in architectural discourse in recent decades, it has emerged as one of the dominant forces guiding real-estate development today. Typology Redux, a conference organized by Northeastern University and Tim Love, Associate Professor and Principal of Utile, began with this apparent paradox to interrogate new theoretical frameworks for designers operating within these market demands. Typology, it seems, has re-entered architectural praxis through the back door.

Courtesy of Sun-Young Park
Courtesy of Sun-Young Park

The first panel, under the theme of ‘Pragmatics,’ engaged designers, critics, and developers to question how architects can work within existing, market-driven typologies to create better urbanism. If the examples, ranging from Roche-Dinkeloo’s Union Carbide headquarters to Bing Thom Architects’ project for Central City in Surrey, offered ways for architects to innovate within an imposed set of typologies, the second panel on ‘History’ challenged our very conception of what a ‘type’ is. In contextualizing the various appearances of this notion throughout its long history, Alan Plattus urged us to question the seeming revival of a functionalist understanding of type, in its current association with real-estate exigencies.

Courtesy of Sun-Young Park
Courtesy of Sun-Young Park

Meanwhile K. Michael Hays posited the re-conceptualization of type as a process that can generate new possibilities, arguing against its reduction to a form of a posteriori abstraction. In the concluding panel on ‘Practices,’ these reflections were re-directed toward architectural practice, as designers and critics questioned where room for typological innovation might lie in face of the external forces acting upon the profession today.

Courtesy of Sun-Young Park
Courtesy of Sun-Young Park

At the close of a day full of incisive observations and lively discussions, we were ultimately left with this parting thought: Between restrictive real-estate logics and idealized conceptions of the type’s generative potential, where is there room for negotiation?

Cite: Sebastian Jordana. "Conference Review: "Typology Redux: Revisiting a theoretical framework for new modes of practice"" 26 Oct 2010. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/84946/conference-review-typology-redux-revisiting-a-theoretical-framework-for-new-modes-of-practice/> ISSN 0719-8884
Read comments