After all, why do we still talk about modernism?

Subscriber Access

Modernism has ceased to exist as a movement in architecture and urbanism since at least the 1980s. In architecture, movements such as Japanese Metabolism and deconstructivism helped to move past the remnants of modern architecture. In urban planning, figures like Jane Jacobs and Christopher Alexander, as early as the 1960s, helped bury the premises of modern urbanism.

Yet, despite more than 50 years of work by Jane Jacobs and Christopher Alexander, and having moved past modern architecture as an architectural style, we still frequently discuss modern architecture and urbanism. Ultimately, why does talking about them still matter?

Content Loader

Image gallery

See allShow less
About this author
Cite: Vale, Paulo. "After all, why do we still talk about modernism?" [Afinal, por que ainda falamos sobre o modernismo?] 05 Jul 2026. ArchDaily. (Trans. Romullo Baratto) Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/1121820/after-all-why-do-we-still-talk-about-modernism> ISSN 0719-8884
Deconstructivist architecture by Daniel Libeskind. Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada. Image: Alexandre Kozoubsky/Flickr

究竟为什么我们至今仍在谈论现代主义?

You've started following your first account!

Did you know?

You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.