The concept of the margin implies the existence of a center. Consequently, anything that is not part of this central focus is deemed external or peripheral. This division between center and margin, or center and periphery, extends beyond the architectural sphere into political, social, and regional realms. Therefore, when we speak of practices on the margins of architecture, we are also discussing multidisciplinary approaches—efforts focused more on understanding the context of the work and less on merely answering pre-established questions. In cultures or contexts shaped by historical discontinuities and interruptions, there is a distinct effort to define identity through self-knowledge and discovery, ultimately designing projects to address specific needs. As a result, research, the dissemination of knowledge, and alternative methods of architectural production become essential steps in this process.
Below, we have compiled examples of broadcasting networks, groups, collectives, and practices that represent professional approaches existing on the margins of a supposedly conventional architectural practice. These initiatives seek to break pre-established patterns by examining the role of architecture in issues such as decolonization, feminism, queerness, and anti-racism—and exploring how this understanding can challenge hegemonic practices and disciplinary conventions through the study of social and local complexities. These practices are not necessarily tied directly to built projects, but rather to research, methodologies, experimentation, participation, and the expansion of professional, regional, and social boundaries.
Matri-Archi(tecture) (South Africa)
