Support on the -- Click here to nominate us for Best Online Magazine!Close
Have you seen our interviews in High Definition?

56 Leonard Street, New York / Herzog & de Meuron

By David Basulto — Filed under: Housing , Skyscrapers , ,
 

Yesterday, I was visiting the Skyscraper Museum in New York, and I saw an incredible aerial photo that shows the evolution of downtown Manhattan during the last century, from the water reclamation to the black towers to the new skyline without the twin towers. Undoubtedly, this city changes its shape very often.

And as of now, new residential buildings are bringing new forms to this skyline. First, we have OMA on the 23rd street with its structural facade and cantilevered volume, and now the 56 Leonard Street building by Herzog & de Meuron, which entered the construction phase.

This 57-story residential in the Tribeca area will house 145 residences, each one with its own unique floor plan and private outdoor space. This typology makes the building look like a stack of houses, away from the traditional skyscraper form. I wonder how the concrete structure works on this building, which was done by consultant firm WSP Cantor Seinuk (who also worked on the Freedom Tower).

With this height, it will surely impact the city skyline as you can see on the panoramic above.

The building features several interior design details done by Herzog & de Meuron, and also a sculpture comissioned to artist Anish Kapoor.

All photos  Copyright Herzog & de Meuron, Basel, 2008

Location
56 Leonard Street, between Church Street and West Broadway, in the Tribeca Historic District of Manhattan, New York City (map).

Schedule
Site Preparation:  Spring/Summer 2008
Construction Commences:  Fall 2008
Projected Occupancy:  Fall 2010

Developer/Sponsor
Alexico Group LLC, New York, NY
Principals:  Izak Senbahar, Simon Elias
Client Representative:  Eric Anderson

Design Architect
Herzog & de Meuron, Basel, Switzerland
Partners: Jacques Herzog, Pierre de Meuron, Ascan Mergenthaler
Project Architects: Vladimir Pajkic (Associate), Philip Schmerbeck , Mehmet Noyan
Project Team: Zachary Vourlas, Jason Whiteley, Daniela     Zimmer,    Mark Chan, Simon Filler, Sara Jacinto, Jin Tack Lim, Mark Loughnan (Associate), Jaroslav Mach, Donald Mak, Hugo Moura, Jeremy Purcell,     James Richards, Heeri Song, Charles Stone (Associate)

Executive Architect
Costas Kondylis and Partners, New York, NY

Construction Management
Hunter Roberts, New York, NY
Site Area: 12,500 square feet

Building Footprint: 12,500 square feet

Building Dimensions
Width:  125 feet
Depth:  100 feet
Height:  830 feet

Gross Floor Area (GF): 425,000 square feet. plus technical, parking and structure

Floors: 57 above (+1 below)

Exterior Materials
Structure:  concrete
Facade:  glass, stainless steel, aluminium, concrete

Interior Materials:
Lobby:  granite floors, absolute granite tile walls, concrete ceilings
Elevators: terrazzo floor, stainless steel mosaic tile walls, polished stainless steel frame

 

23 comments »

tyler says:

I really like this building… nice deconstruction of a tower.

 
# September 16, 2008 at 11:35
Scott says:

I like it. In my opinion, I think the balconies on the lower portion of the building detract from the overall look. The building goes from a regular floorplan to an irregular one quite dramatically, but the balconies hide that, and make the building look messy.

The cantilevers of the upper portion look less dramatic when the entire building has small balconies cantilevering up the whole facade.

 
# September 16, 2008 at 12:43
Paul Garrett says:

Paul Rudolph often incorporated design ideas of other architects into his work, and even joked about it, saying “A good idea is a good idea,” However, I find it unconscionable that Paul Rudolph is not mentioned as an insiprationl source for this new 56 Leonard Street highhrise. It’s an exciting new building and should certainly be encouraged, but it also looks like Paul Rudolph’s Graphic Arts Center project on Prozac. Is this failure to credit out of self promotion or shameful ignorance?

 
# September 17, 2008 at 12:12
Nokadota says:

Wow, this is amazing. I would love to live in a building like this.

 
# September 19, 2008 at 15:25
Terry Glenn Phipps says:

Mr. Garrett it seems really doubtful to me that Herzog & DeMeuron have the faintest idea who Paul Rudolph was or exactly whom they are cribbing ideas from. Luckily for New York this building happens to make sense. It could just as easily have not. These days asking for knowledge of architectural history, theory, and reason is simply asking too much.

Terry Glenn Phipps

 
# May 3, 2009 at 07:43
    ygogolak says:

    So every building that is done now has to credit the person who had a similar idea? It’s all been done before to some extent. I didn’t know Rudolph was the first of his kind to do such work, and to imply that shows a lack of “knowledge of architectural history, theory, and reason”.

     
    # September 8, 2009 at 14:55

really great!, 1 is the game’s creative, is not to say when ngoa architects is the brain of science, the soul of poetry and sometimes the hands of the artist ….

 
# June 25, 2009 at 05:33

really great!, 1 is the game’s creative, is not to say when said architects is the brain of science, the soul of poetry and sometimes the hands of the artist ….

 
# June 25, 2009 at 05:37
Joshua says:

@ Terry and Paul

Paul, stylistically I cna understand your reference to Rudolph, however architecturally, there’s not that much crossover as this project is in situ, not pre fabricated. Instead of the G Arts center on prozac [somehow you mean it is happier?!] I’d say this project is more like the Farnsworth house on Viagra.

Terry,

H&dM are one of the most important offices in the world, their work is undeniably thoughtful, engaging and elegantly detailed. They won the Pritzker for Pete’s sake! I’m pretty sure they know about the Dean of Yale. To say that H&dM doesn’t know or care about a pillar of late modernism is kind of like saying Carmelo Anthony never heard of Michael Jordan.
What a ridiculous statement.

 
# June 25, 2009 at 06:29
moun says:

I just wanna know, what’s on the ground floor? A bean? A potato? Why? So strange for them to put such a sculpture there.

 
# September 6, 2009 at 10:35
Lorenzo says:

Yesterday I was near the site but I dont saw anything that remember a constuction site. Are they two Leonard Street in New York or what?

 
# September 23, 2009 at 11:23
Miao Zhang says:

That’s nice.I really like it.Meaybe the bean at the first floor is little strang.How does it conect with the inverianment?

 
# September 23, 2009 at 12:15

This building will definitely be a great sight once it is finished. I can imagine any of those higher apartments being used as a set for a movie or a tv show. Beckons a thought or two.

 
# September 23, 2009 at 14:51
Lorenzo says:

I discovered why I didnt saw its construction site: everything’s stopped due finacial problems :D

 
# September 24, 2009 at 19:39

Links to this article »

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

sorry, i dont see any Taiwanese culture on this one.....[+]
it would be nice if there was some...[+]
damn idioms[+]
is interesting to u ke do not use much of their context it...[+]
without words a project with many flaws[+]
so bad design[+]
a nice intervention.. so clean![+]
Living in this nice place will keep people in shape!!![+]
sergio de oliveira on House in Foz / Sergio Koch:
….o racionalismo leva a conclusões muito rapidas...[+]
Projects NOT for consideration: ::...[+]
I like the work by TGH… well...[+]
wow, now that’s what i’m talking about.[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »