Visit our Products section to learn more about architectural products.

Huanacu Warehouse & Office / tFPS

By David Basulto — Filed under: Institutional Architecture , Offices , Selected , , ,
 
© nico saieh

© nico saieh

Architects: tFPS
Location: Santiago, Chile
Project team: Eduardo Fam Mancilla, Diego Pinochet Puentes, Leonardo Suárez Molina
Structural engineer: José Manuel Morales
Site area: 3,128 sqm
Constructed area: 1,670 sqm
Project year: 2006-2009
Photographs: Nicolas Saieh & tFPS

© nico saieh © nico saieh © tFPS © nico saieh

This Project, our first project as architects, started in 2006. It sets as the perfect projection of three recently graduated (in fact… graduating) architectural student´s concerns, about the discipline´s approach to the architectural project: One related to the formal exploration, a playfull one that can lead us to a differentiation to historical types of common architecture (typical boring boxes). Another, related to a rigorous technical approach (so the formal exploration can emerge in the reality), and finally a strong commitment, with elemental life situations that define the architecture (formal and technical approaches).

formal diagrams

formal diagrams

The project can be described through three points.

The assignment

A big warehouse (with administrative offices and showroom), a “cool one”( just as the client request), one that can “stands out” in contrast to the typical industrial architecture of the close context of the project, but… as cheap as we can produce it (aprox $430 USD/sqm). A form that could respond to the internal logics of the company´s operation (charge and discharge of products, exhibition of these products in the showroom, administrative operations, etc).

© tFPS

© tFPS

floor plans

floor plans

The restrictions

  1. A limited budget (enough to build a typical warehouse)
  2. Strict regulations of the zone (an industrial park near to the main airport of the city)
  3. About the internal operations of the company

This led us to a fundamental question: How can we operate on the form, responding to the requirements of the client and the building regulations of the zone, and beside fit into the small budget?.

© nico saieh

© nico saieh

The equation that defines the problem was clear: client demands + building regulations demands + tight budget = a cool and unique building. Clearly , not an easy one…

The first approach to the problem solution, came from the idea of concentrate all the efforts to the exposed facades of the building (The site was defined by two streets), generating “perimeter activated by the program”(where liberties about building regulations were less strict) and leaving the production activities protected to the inside of the site.

model

model

The formal operation or “where final architecture emerge”

How to operate on the form, then?, Where to start?. Taking the basic idea of a normal box (basically, a typical storage building …a big shed) inverted. We started to think about this strong image , and the formal logic that we can explore and explode , to transform ( starting from the same surface area of the initial box), the most exposed faces of the building to receive the critical activities demanded for the client.

We use of a typical structure of industrialized steel frames (to let us have less cost in structural calculations), but operating from the folding of the skin (finally, the cheapest and more workable object in technical terms).

© tFPS

© tFPS

A series of foldings (mainly three operations), allowed us to generate the two fronts, that in terms of proportions and surface area, are the same of a regular industrial building, so in that way we can insert the different activities of the program and elemental situations (showroom, administrative facilities, truck access, etc):

Access: A first folding that allowed the access to the showroom through the corner, recognizing from a single view the two folded facades of the building.

© nico saieh

© nico saieh

Work and view: A second folding of the west facade generates the office volume, allowing the views (the main demand of the client) to the future “los maitenes” park (hoping it will be ready in a year or two), separated from the industrial activities and with as much natural light as possible.

Work and production: Generating the larger folding to “rio itata” street, a big five meter overhang that forms the roof protecting the loading and unloading activities from rain and strong sun, connecting this space fluidly with the rest of the building.

 

27 comments »

oma suarz says:

congatulation

 
# November 9, 2009 at 13:06

i’ve seen this project in the tFPS blog, and the photos don’t helped a lot.

Now featured with new photos it gets better but still seems a little forced form to only “be cool”

Anyway, really good work to be a first project.

 
# November 9, 2009 at 13:46
Pablo says:

bien, pero esa fachada poniente en verano debe ser un horno.

 
# November 9, 2009 at 13:52

    la verdad es que no lo es , la estrategia de ventilacion cruzada funciona a la perfeccion. y lamentablemente fue un requerimiento “no negociable” el cliente queria si o si una fachada que viera al parque . la verdad es que no es terrible para nada.

    saludos

    dp

     
    # November 9, 2009 at 20:29
      Pablo says:

      gracias por la réplica, el proyecto es destacable. Sería bueno que colgaran tambien algún esquema de cómo funciona la ventilación cruzada que mencionas, en el proyecto.

      saludos y felicitaciones.

       
      # November 10, 2009 at 12:42
ygogolak says:

Great project. This type of building is usually not designed as much as “pulled off the shelf”. Very nice for $130/s.f.

 
# November 9, 2009 at 14:50
simos says:

a wish there were more projects
“with a little forced form only to be cool”

if they cost more or less the same, what’s wrong with cool?

after all it’s a warehouse, in the best case scenario it would be a box cladded with colorful panels..

and actually, they have tweaked the structure and skin a bit, which is architecturally interesting anyways, ie solving details etc

it’s a good study for future projects with more complicated program

i’d call it “experimental” but in a very modest, down to earth and low budget way

i’m thumbs up. definitely.

 
# November 9, 2009 at 14:54

This design is great fun … clever.

 
# November 9, 2009 at 17:07
Tee says:

My first congrats to the buildup of the architectural team (our team will be composed almost the same) when finally finished with university.
My second congrats to the building itself, above all the first project.
Its simple, not to simple.
Cool, but for the utilization not to cool.
.
.
.
You got exactly what was wanted and pushed it above all a level higher.

Very inspiring.

 
# November 10, 2009 at 05:19
ppto says:

sencillo y funcional … interesante …..felicitaciones a los arquitectos … se puede hacer buena arquitectura en chile

 
# November 10, 2009 at 06:31
othoha says:

muy padre el diseño para oficina

 
# November 10, 2009 at 10:18
Miguel Medina Vizcaya says:

Chile se asoma al munod por su arquitecura contemporánea, que colocando conceptos de varias corrientes- funcionaliemo, desconstructivismo- llega a ser amena e interesante.
Saludos al arquitecto Pinochet.

Arq. Miguel Medina Vizcaya
Nuevo Laredo Tamaulipas, Mexico

 
# November 10, 2009 at 11:43
Man says:

Deberían contratar a estos talentosos arquitectos no sólo en Chile!

 
# November 10, 2009 at 22:15

you can check the construction process in damn-arq.wordpress.com its a blog we did with all the painfull process of construction. hope u like it.

 
# November 11, 2009 at 12:32
A Sphere says:

great deal comes great project

 
# November 12, 2009 at 13:05
Aya says:

That’s the coolest warehouse ever! I really like this design I wish there were more designs like this!

 
# November 23, 2009 at 13:47
Mariam says:

is it a warehouse !!!!! *shocked & impressed* unique and interesting .. ! i really loved how the architect played with light inside the building !!

 
# November 24, 2009 at 11:29
kiekie says:

oh god, bagus sekali, muito bonito, great works,
I like the façade,, the shape,,

 
# January 19, 2010 at 09:01

Links to this article »

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

BANG COCK[+]
El Centro Pompidou fue terminado en 1977…[+]
I agree with the comment of ema, any architect should take...[+]
The archetype form they show for a yurt doesn’t even look correct. It looks more...[+]
a Beaubourg coming a little bit late[+]
kudos for that lovely spill of irony…[+]
I can not realize that, how architects can still design useless rooftops in a city like...[+]
“inspiration from the yurt”??? “the team transformed the traditional...[+]
archilocus on Ordos Hotel / EXH Design:
The object itself is appealing, but if the architects really wanted to make a stack...[+]
I have the same complaint. I remember sitting in...[+]
Jesse Lockhart-Krause on Media-TIC / Enric Ruiz Geli:
It’s great to see that the ‘high tech’ movement is...[+]
I don’t know what a ‘mayor energetic load’ is, but I definately want...[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »