Visit our Products section to learn more about architectural products.

Building collapse in Shanghai

By David Basulto — Filed under: News , Structures ,
 

Typical cases of structure damage show portions of or whole buildings collapsing, but this is the first time that I see a building perfectly toppled.

The 13-story building is part of the Lotus Riverside complex in suburban Shanghai.  The cause of this epic structural fail is under investigation, but first sources claim that an error on construction and unstable soil conditions are the probable causes.

More images after the break.

You can see another photoset at Flickr.

 

120 comments »

Craig says:

Well, at least the top part of the building seem to be of quite sturdy construction!

 
# June 30, 2009 at 12:59
Follow_Up says:

Great exmple of how important are footings… the rest is a joke haha

 
# June 30, 2009 at 13:02
darly says:

spectacular!

 
# June 30, 2009 at 13:03
branden says:

right click -> save picture as cool

 
# June 30, 2009 at 13:05
Kon says:

Doesnt everything MADE IN CHINA break before it should.

 
# June 30, 2009 at 13:05
Brogo says:

How long until the same buildings next door topple over?

 
# June 30, 2009 at 13:28
    dan says:

    same problems were spoted in russia in the past and they were solved by injecting concrete instead of the water that was in the soil. everything can be fixed

     
    # July 14, 2009 at 15:29
PanamArq says:

wow!!!

 
# June 30, 2009 at 13:29
rodrigo bocater says:

as i know ‘chinas’. next week will be a brand new building again. transformer´s land!

 
# June 30, 2009 at 13:36
alex says:

Note to self: Never ever live in a building MADE IN CHINA.

 
# June 30, 2009 at 14:54
Mike says:

According to witness, not a single glass window was broken in the process, go figure.

 
# June 30, 2009 at 15:00
Nathan says:

Was there a mudslide? I don’t see much of a footing at the base of the building.

 
# June 30, 2009 at 15:09
Alec Murgia says:

INCREIBLE!

 
# June 30, 2009 at 15:11
fb says:

Why do I have a feeling that most of these materials will be reused in the next building?

 
# June 30, 2009 at 15:11
dustin says:

How would you like to be living in the building next to it?

 
# June 30, 2009 at 15:15
George V says:

Just get a crane and lift that bad boy up. Let it walk it off of bit and it’ll be good as new.

 
# June 30, 2009 at 15:28
anonymous says:

I thought it was the last MVRDV’s proyect in China.

 
# June 30, 2009 at 16:32
Lucas Gray says:

I lived and worked in china and this is just a perfect example of the reckless building culture there. I mean there is some seriously shoddy workmanship.

This is classic!

 
# June 30, 2009 at 16:34
JaM says:

Yea…….I bet the property owners are about to lose ALOT of tenants.

 
# June 30, 2009 at 16:56
Luison says:

f*cking great

 
# June 30, 2009 at 17:26
George V says:

You know, I’m actually not so sure about comments like shoddy workmanship. The building is incredibly intact and I’m incredibly impressed. Sure the guys need to get a better handle on the foundation but the rest of the building is in tip top shape.

 
# June 30, 2009 at 17:32
dustin says:

maybe the Architecture Gods knocked it down because it was so ugly.

 
# June 30, 2009 at 18:32
viniruski says:

Adjacent site excavated without rakers or tiebacks. That’s why this stunning piece of architecture toppled over.

 
# June 30, 2009 at 18:45
biboarchitect says:

What’s these hollow pipes coming out of the building? it doesn’t look like columns..

 
# June 30, 2009 at 19:00
    David says:

    They’re Piles Genious.

     
    # July 16, 2009 at 13:51
pedro falé says:

the American house floats,

the Chinese house collapses…

hahahahahah.

 
# June 30, 2009 at 19:06
pedja says:

…the other two are standing proud…….hihihihihi….this is brilliant!!!and just imagine that this building stays like this and gets functionable…….climbing from one room to the other,walking on the walls,everything that we all imagined when we were kids……fantastic…….they should keep it like this and take the advantage of the situation :)))))))))))

 
# June 30, 2009 at 19:33
john K says:

i would take some pictures climbing up like spiderman ,, jajaja,,,

 
# June 30, 2009 at 19:38
Justin says:

Having worked in the real estate business and having inspected thousands of properties I assume that proper investigations weren’t carried out before construction started on this project. An environmental survey should have been undertaken which would have ascertained the type of concrete that should have been used. The core soil samples underneath this building probably indictated a high water table. Also, these sort of investigations would have revealed the depth that the piles should go into the ground. There must have been some sort of mistake / shortcut taken by the developer otherwise this wouldn’t have happened.

I’m sure this will start happening in Dubai sometime soon. The concrete mixes they were so weak that the buildings are destined for the same fate.

 
# June 30, 2009 at 20:16
aufi says:

i think if theres people in it during the collapse…
they just think that they just have a major headache and the world suddenly topple down..hahhah

 
# June 30, 2009 at 21:55
jp says:

Look at the Second picture.. it creates this new undulating wave if you stand far enough away.

i like it more that way =]

 
# June 30, 2009 at 22:04
xing says:

hey guys, this is an architectural tragic, be mercy.

 
# June 30, 2009 at 22:05
czx says:

i’m Chinese Guy and i’m sure there’re so many ugly Architecture like that.Actually,the most of Architects in China is copyist and trash-maker

 
# July 1, 2009 at 02:44
FLW says:

They might hot glue it back on!

 
# July 1, 2009 at 03:36
jiri says:

I hope, nobody died.

 
# July 1, 2009 at 05:50
Rich says:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/8123559.stm

Apparently it was just about to be completed. One worker died

 
# July 1, 2009 at 07:08
Stefii says:

I wonder why the window glass is OK???

 
# July 1, 2009 at 08:40
Jubair Siddeeque says:

You can see the piles topples on the pile cap. How sick would engineers be to design such short and thin piles for such a tall building

 
# July 1, 2009 at 08:55
    mercury says:

    i think the piles snapped at its welding connection, not possible for the piles to have piled at that length. the rest of the piles must be inside the soil. i do think it is design phase fault. soil stability problem. should have do soil improvement before constructing at such site.

     
    # July 14, 2009 at 08:37
Jacob Antoni says:

for pedja, just great idea and make it a museum or themepark. glas is still fine…

 
# July 1, 2009 at 09:47
Jacob Antoni says:

…or lets pour out some concrete at the place and lift it up again the upper part is still propper! this way “re-use” of things comes to china!

 
# July 1, 2009 at 09:49
zaovdeilizaponeti says:

German Nazi architect Albert Speer and his felows had an a theory that architect was suposed to imagine and draw how his project would look like after it colapsed or distroyed. The idea was making a kind of resemple of an aincent Rome monuments like Coloseum, so Hitler could admire it’s greatness.

Maybe this is some kind of reviving that theory… :-)

PS. one person died as i heard…

 
# July 1, 2009 at 09:50
UHHH says:

Someone’s got some ’splainin to do!

 
# July 1, 2009 at 10:18
Haolan Qin says:

http://www.wsbtv.com/news/19900877/detail.html#

Yes, this kind of things only happen in China.

BTW, I worked in that building a few years ago when it was brand new so I know for a fact the parking deck is only a few years old.

On a related note, my stainless steel GE microwave, Marantz receiver and Sony flat-screen TV all broke down before they should while my $20 Haier microwave is still working like a champ but I wouldn’t trash Marantz or Sony and sing praises to Haier because I actually have a brain.

Full disclosure: I’m Chinese. And no, I am not proud of the quality of Chinese products.

 
# July 1, 2009 at 10:48
radu says:

I think it is built in that positions and lifted in place. is a new brand in architecture.

 
# July 1, 2009 at 11:11
Teapodd says:

This is should be the new way of recyclation of the buildings!
Why blow them up? Just flood the ground and then dismount it! :D
Its could me cheaper than traditional way :)

 
# July 1, 2009 at 12:04

jiri: Yes. I’m flat-out depressed that you’re the first to mention potential casualties.

Rich: Thanks for the link. Sucks for the one worker who died, but imagine how many would have died if this building would’ve been occupied.

I love bashing generic architecture and all that, but seriously? Have a little humanity and think for a second before you hit “Submit” next time.

 
# July 1, 2009 at 13:02
Archy says:

My source out of Shanghai states that the news reported that the building collapsed when the river bank gave way from the excavation of the parking garage. The collapsing bank and shallow piles were enough to cause the building to fall over (considering the ground was mush from heavy rain, the building fell over rather slowly cause it to remain mostly intact) Also, due to low grade concrete, Chinese residential buildings use rather large amounts of lower grade concrete, making the structures very monolithic and versely stable, hence the intact nature of the fallen building

 
# July 1, 2009 at 13:13
uriel says:

Era uma casa
Muito engraçada
Não tinha fundação
Não tinha nada…

 
# July 1, 2009 at 13:31
Ralf says:

The ages of the great wall are gone,
sorry China.

 
# July 1, 2009 at 13:56
Francisco Pardo Téllez says:

La ventaja de tener aislamientos iguales o mayores a la altura del edificio, permitio que cayera sobre la zona verde sin arrastrar al edifico posterior, lastima un video por que es de extrañar que los vidrios no se rompieron o es que son láminas de plastico?

 
# July 2, 2009 at 00:01
Virginia says:

This is a joke surely…

 
# July 2, 2009 at 01:20
Vincent says:

I work near the collapse building, within days, they’ve cleared up the mess, I don’t think much investigation was done if any, and guess what the local government was trying to cover it up, I guess somethings never change.

 
# July 2, 2009 at 01:20
    Lawrence says:

    Then what are you doing in China if you think they are doing dodgy? guess that reflects your standard.

     
    # July 15, 2009 at 10:13
      Phil says:

      Lawrence says:
      “Then what are you doing in China if you think they are doing dodgy? guess that reflects your standard.”

      Lawrence, how can you say that?

      So everyone in the largest populated country in the world should all just just ‘up sticks’ and emigrate. To where?

      How easy would it be for you to move to another country if something similar happened near you?

       
      # August 21, 2009 at 06:55
影子绝对零度 says:

.
.
.
出名了
.
.
.

 
# July 2, 2009 at 23:55

For those who haven’t built in Shanghai: Shanghai sits on top an alluvial floodplain, hence is prone to highly reactive soils. Earthquake liquification is also a major concern, not just from natural earthquakes, but also man-made ones such as a compactor or vibro-drill. Shanghai has quite strict earthquake codes, and the minimal loss of life and largely intact building are testament to that.

The concern I would have with that building is the piling – they don’t look big enough or deep enough from my expereince in Shanghai. It looks like there was not large enough / deep enough purchase for friction piles, and either the earth surged around the building, or a water pipe gave way and undercut half the building.

Still, If I had bought an apartment in that development, I’d want my money back too! I would do the same no matter where the building was built – China doesn’t have a monopoly on shoddy building or engineering.

 
# July 3, 2009 at 01:27
max says:

确实出名了,被抓到小辫子了,看看他们幸灾乐祸的样子

 
# July 3, 2009 at 01:33
Hattieman says:

The architect: “Wo goo-ee du”, or “I meant to do that”.

 
# July 3, 2009 at 02:06
joninberlin says:

I thought OMA’s ‘Prada Transformer’ had already been posted on this website ;)

 
# July 3, 2009 at 05:59
Lasse says:

No no no no, dear chineese constructors: First you build the foundation and parking spaces in the basement – then you build the building.

One more time:

FIRST foundation! THEN the building itself AFTERWARDS..

AND if you chose to do it the other way around please evacuate the building first.
This killed one construction worker who dicided to go back in for his tool box.. Who lets his imployee/colleague go back into a collapsing building? sad……

 
# July 3, 2009 at 18:53
wemimo ajax says:

this is very ridiculous…….i wonder the blast and sound that will occur during this devastating action……….. men it more that boom! i like the picture, a house lieing flat……… man is unconsious, and homovanderous even to itself many people go don die.. and some hypertension go don kill them…………. the dead RIP, the builder watch ur ways.

 
# July 4, 2009 at 12:13
Bruce says:

Hmmm…does not look all that bad….they could just about stand it back up again and not a problem eh? :p

 
# July 4, 2009 at 15:53
yumi says:

让他们过过嘴瘾吧。。。。。

 
# July 6, 2009 at 05:16
sky says:

cool man…

 
# July 6, 2009 at 22:45
belly says:

嘿嘿 看希奇的评论 先进的自豪

 
# July 6, 2009 at 23:22
JING says:

哎,这叫好事不出门,坏事传千里,有什么的了,大惊小怪的……

 
# July 6, 2009 at 23:27
Laurent says:

Hey that same chinese structural engineering team used to work a lot on public building down here in Mexico City in the 80’s, but after 1985 I just lost track of them, I wondered where they had been all this time!!

 
# July 7, 2009 at 00:17
Ralph Kent says:

Good luck to the developers selling flats in the two adjacent, identical buildings, no doubt built with the same foundations. I bet the punters are beating a path your door to buy up an apartment in one of those blocks after this…

 
# July 7, 2009 at 10:29
bharat bansal says:

simply wonderful
should be regarded/enhaced as a ‘monument’ for the genius of the builders

 
# July 10, 2009 at 01:19
Bruce says:

No excuse whatsoever for this kind of debacle. They are extremely fortunate that people were not living there at the time. I work right behind the I-35W bridge in Minneapolis, which collapsed back in 2007. Same thing…somewhere, somebody, AND some people who were supposed to be inspecting it, screwed up very badly.

 
# July 14, 2009 at 20:40
tony montana says:

From experience I realized that chinese people always take shortcuts whether it is saving money, or saving time, ex. making fake goods, crappy food etc…

 
# July 15, 2009 at 13:39
Jacob Antoni says:

imagine you life in the other building still standing but with the same construction – i could not sleep!!!

 
# July 15, 2009 at 16:24
Bruce says:

I would not be too quick to judge the Chinese people necessarily, but I do take issue with the Chinese authorities, the governmental body supposed to be in charge of inspections. Corruption in government is rampant all throughout Asia. This is just a glaring example of what the consequences can be. Far past the time for governents to begin really working in the best interests of the people they are supposed to serve.

 
# July 15, 2009 at 17:10
chester pisco says:

as a junior structural engr its a failure in shear, and overturning causes it to collapse when u design buildings analize it n most especially investigate properly ol the possibilities n future problems that natural disorders brings
consider ur design as ur life because when u design you consider safetiness of everyone…..as a junior sanitary engr maybe PPVCP lacks in the proj hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe

 
# July 29, 2009 at 10:49
    Bruce says:

    Perhaps if engineers learned proper grammar there would be less problems due to muddled communication.

     
    # July 29, 2009 at 17:37
tunnnnnn says:

interior designer’s gonna have a lot of headache decorating the room in this angle

 
# August 4, 2009 at 19:49
nikky says:

this is serious.can anything good come out of china?

 
# August 5, 2009 at 05:53
Bruce says:

Every room comes with a skylight…

 
# August 6, 2009 at 17:45
Random Name says:

Inadequate planning and execution of shoring and excavation sequences in construction cause these type of catastrophes. Higher standards with respect to construction specifications, on-site inspections, and overall practice with respect to installation and design of foundations of structures should be taken account for. And everyone (including both designer and contractor) should be on the same page with respect to maintaining communication. The foundation’s ability to keep a structure in place within its ground conditions is one of the most fundamental (and least glamorous) aspects of building design, and one can see what happens when one overlooks it. That apartment had one helluva sturdy frame, and at the end…it was all for not.

 
# October 12, 2009 at 23:27

Links to this article »

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

Eğitim, kültür, sanat, mizah, tarih ne ararsan nezih ve şeffaf..en iyi yapıtlar...[+]
E somos dois. Boring![+]
and I thought the Postmodernism movement was dead…[+]
i think the basic idea breaking the appartments in puzzle like pieces to form unit,...[+]
love the picts, it has an ethereal quality to it for sure.[+]
From Dusk Till Dawn[+]
David Basulto on Rosa Muerta / Robert Stone:
Why not? If the author wants to decorate it that way, it’s ok. Actually, I...[+]
Haven’t a clue. I was unable to force myself to care enough to finish his novella....[+]
It is good– better than jurgen meyer: simpler...[+]
A pretentious, egotistical blowhard, and in the field of architecture? How utterly...[+]
I fully understand that it is not just about the building. I fully understand the idea,...[+]
I like the stair and the external view I can’t imagine the spaces...[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »