Support on the -- Click here to nominate us for Best Online Magazine!Close
Have you seen our interviews in High Definition?

Taiwan Solar Powered Stadium / Toyo Ito

By Sebastian J — Filed under: Sports Architecture , ,
 

Construction is finished for Japanese architect Toyo Ito’s Solar Powered Stadium in Taiwan. The stadium’s roof is covered by 8,844 solar panels. The stadium is located in Kaohsiung, Taiwan and it was built to coincide with the opening of the World Games, to be held this July.

The “World Games Stadium” holds 55,000 spectators and it cost $150 million to build. The stadium will hold the record for largest solar-powered stadium in the world with it’s 14,155m2 roof. It could potentially generate  1.14 gigawatt hours of electricity every year, enough to power up to 80% of the sorrounding neighbourhood.

Seen at deputydog. More images, after the break.

YouTube Preview Image
 

48 comments »

rachid says:

wow. a designer who has mastered his domain.

 
# May 19, 2009 at 22:17
    capngp says:

    OK, They’re capturing a jigawatt of power. Where are they storing it? Does a stadium need this much power collection? Are they really providing power to 80% of the surrounding houses? If so, how is the investment capitalized, and how do the people pay for the power they receive? Just practical questions; I live on a boat 3 months out of the year and depend largely on solar to power my lifestyle. For all you greenies, I suggest you try living on a boat. Limited power, limited hot water, and limited fresh water. It’s not the utopia you predict, but some find it to be fun.

    Greg

     
    # August 13, 2009 at 01:51
bothands says:

makes the US seem so friggin ass-backwards its not even funny

 
# May 19, 2009 at 22:20
Fino says:

I….am impressed. This is probably the best use of photovoltaic panels I have ever seen. Finally, going green was thought of as being a sleek integration to the entire structure, instead of an add-on afterthought. I’m a fan.

that is all.

 
# May 19, 2009 at 22:22
Ben lepley says:

Fino- Well stated. This thing kicks ass.

Why couldn’t eiseman done this in AZ? Oh yeah, he is American, and always badmouths environmentalists. – oh and it was supposed look like a snake.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/crive/2432708117/

I look forward to seeing more projects this sleek and solar. btw 1.14gw of energy is HUGE

 
# May 19, 2009 at 22:36
fokt says:

It’s too bad stadiums in the US always seem to try to harken back to the old school fields of 100 years ago. It just makes them look like they were taken out of a tacky theme park.

 
# May 19, 2009 at 22:37
dennis says:

that has to be my most favorite stadium now….and also the stadium to make me think, why havent we been incorporating solar paneling into stadiums the past 30 years?? seriously, this just makes other stadiums look ridicules.

 
# May 19, 2009 at 23:16
dustin says:

This is one of very few projects that thinks beyond it’s own needs and actually affects the surrounding community in a positive way other than a visual or social impact. Yes, the use solar panels in stadiums is a very logical and underused application. Congradulations Mr. Ito.

 
# May 19, 2009 at 23:57
corto says:

impressive… but i am not sure about the cost…
150million is a funny number for such stadium with 55.000 seats and photovoltaic roof… i would expect something more expensive… if it’s the true cost, then there’s no excuse for not building roofs like these…

 
# May 20, 2009 at 00:54
Dominic says:

I posted this at parq, its a great stadium and a great source of energy. More images can be found at: http://www.archtracker.com/kaohsiung-stadium-toyo-ito/2009/05/

 
# May 20, 2009 at 02:10

Stunning.

 
# May 20, 2009 at 02:25
Frederick says:

Fino, I couldn’t agree more !
First example of inspired use of Photovoltaics,
WOW !

But ok you could be boring and say that they are not used to max efficiency as the inclination is defined by the skin…
Makes me think, imagine the same thing with a skin reacting to the position of the sun, with solar panels which tilt to follow the sun. The whole building would then change aspect, just like the H&deM stadium in Munich but without the LEDs… Anyone ready for a challenge?

 
# May 20, 2009 at 02:28
MZ says:

I agree with all you guys, but just one little thought on the side: did you read the prise-tag? It is actually possible to build about five stadions for that prise, of course cheap materials, no details, no design, no enviromental conciousness. Nonetheless, this one practically functions as a power-plant, it is actually a plus-energy-house, so the extra investment will pay off on the long run. But you have to have the dough first.

 
# May 20, 2009 at 02:44
DM_A says:

simply great.
This should be shown in every school of architecture worldwide.

 
# May 20, 2009 at 02:49
Ayth1 says:

MZ, You sound like you work for a standing seam metal roofing company.

 
# May 20, 2009 at 03:15
dariusz says:

This is amazing..beauty and actually works. What a great idea. Makes some big name architects who preach about sustainability look a bit small.. Great work and I hope other architects will see this and follow this closely.

 
# May 20, 2009 at 03:18
annasir says:

snake!great..

 
# May 20, 2009 at 03:34
Ste says:

well this is a great design and i really nice idea for the roof facade… i like the way toyo ito combines the useability and the design here…

jsut one thing about the stadium as a stadium… its quite dissapointing that the supporters are that far away from the action so it will lack the certain ambiance imho…

 
# May 20, 2009 at 04:43
francis says:

Ito has highlighted (yet again) what an architect is capable of – not just raising consciousness in designs but at the business end too. Goodness knows how hard he had to work to gain the go-ahead. This work is head and shoulders above all the ones that pinned all their hopes on … well, you form your own conclusions. A delicious theory would be if the management behind the “large” stadiums curtail the extortionate fees that players and managers demand; we may see all stadiums of the future taking to Mr. Ito’s lead. I believe a month’s salary from a top football team would be near enough to pay for their own worthy stadium?
Parallels can be drawn from all scale and scope of work undertaken by an architect. A similarity could be the “LONDON EYE” … I understand DMJB fought their way through the planners, funding, designs … and now, see how glorious, financially satisfying … and copied all round the world.
Congratulations to Ito and the World Games Stadium.

 
# May 20, 2009 at 04:43
fl!p says:

lets vote! toyo ito’s stadium or the bird’s nest?

 
# May 20, 2009 at 05:10
Sami says:

It is also very impressive to see how the exterior enveloppe opens up and creates a square… very good urban gesture…

 
# May 20, 2009 at 07:29
Sami says:

for that reason I vote for Ito’s stadium

 
# May 20, 2009 at 07:30
ulises says:

Come on guys, what’s up with the U.S. Bashing! Beautiful design no doubt…but let’s not count on eggs before they hatch. Let’s see how efficient this stadium really is once it’s up and going…About the overall cost, I don’t believe it for one sec….

 
# May 20, 2009 at 08:54
Taragon says:

“the extra investment will pay off on the long run” how do we know this as a fact?? As responsible architects we should not react to beautiful form and/or an interesting concept but instead on practicality and function! This stadium is amazing! but to assume all these ‘green fantasies’ based on theoretical future assumptions is, in my opinion, rather naive of us Architects. How do we know what the maintenance of all these solar panels going to be? Will the costs offset the efficiency? Will this building really meet the expectations once put into practice? I think the building is spectacular! but I will not jump the gun yet by saying it is a sensible peace of architecture. Hope it will…

 
# May 20, 2009 at 09:05
    bruno says:

    well, it’s only through big investments in the alternative energy market that it will become more and more efficient, even if this isn’t the most perfect sustainable building they are at least trying, and from tries you can learn.
    Your questions about it’s true efficiency seem just as much “based on theoretical future assumptions”, they’ve probably put all this on balance before someone paid for it, and if not we should just be glad they’re spending their money on things like this instead of big falic buildings.

     
    # October 13, 2009 at 10:13
PUmar says:

How much energy did it take to build all those solar panels??? How much energy was used to build all the digital/electronic infrastructure to make this thing go??? Is it really green?

Good point Taragon on what the future might hold on these types of buildings but hasn’t the damage already been done?

Aside from the Green topic, I love the building as architecture! PERIOD!!

 
# May 20, 2009 at 09:10
Bo Lucky says:

I don’t understand why we are talking here about great architecture. This is a great engineering!!! Though an architect has his role, I would think it’s relatively minor in projects like this. It’s a beautiful piece in every aspect… I wish I could cooperate with so brilliant engineers.

 
# May 20, 2009 at 09:20
patentpolice says:

Pritzker material, I hope this seals it. Another project by him that seems stunning and complex on many layers.

 
# May 20, 2009 at 09:24
KNT says:

“The show must go on…”

 
# May 20, 2009 at 09:54
Lasse says:

Bo Lucky – what are you talking about?
Is it only architecture when we as architects have no obligation to a complex programme (I hope not)? or are you talking about the structure of the skin?

If you look closer you might find other layers than the computergenerated skin…

I would also like to know what architecture you DO like (name one example!)? and what projects you do yourself..?

 
# May 20, 2009 at 11:06
Bo Lucky says:

@Lasse
Let’s limit the discussion to the above project. It’s pointless to do otherwise… so, how would you estimate an extent of the input of an architect in this architectural/engineering marvel? How would you define difference between a gem of architecture as opposed to a gem of engineering?

 
# May 20, 2009 at 11:24
francis says:

Bo Lucky – I’ve read all your lectures on energy efficiency, defining architecture … please please educate me on the definition of a “gem of engineering”? I want to learn so I can pitch it to Mr. Calatrava.

 
# May 20, 2009 at 12:27
Bo Lucky says:

@francis
If you you feel you need education, go back to school :)

 
# May 20, 2009 at 13:01
francis says:

Bo – well, that’s clever, NOT! What about the “gem of engineering”?

 
# May 20, 2009 at 13:53
JJ says:

Just one comment: I was a student of Cecil Balmond when I was at UPenn and I remember him remarking that out of all the architects that he’s ever worked with, Ito was the only one who could actually have a substantive back and forth conversation about structural engineering on all levels. This is just to say that it is possible for one person to bridge the gap between “architecture” and “engineering,” they don’t have to function as separate disciplines

As a side note, I also think Balmond has had so much success because of his ability to bridge these disciplines. I hope this is the future, the above arguments seem so silly to me.

 
# May 20, 2009 at 13:57
Bo Lucky says:

There are great architects amongst engineers and great engineers amongst architects. Regardless a number of people involved in this project, it is (and was) my opinion that the Taiwan Solar Powered Stadium is a great engineering achievement of an exceptional architectural quality.

 
# May 20, 2009 at 14:41
jb says:

this is truly a stroke of genius, when everything just comes together.
i was starting to get bored with stadium designs. i worked with nbbj for a while and i am also sick of the entertainment stadiums. this one is so refreshing to see.

 
# May 20, 2009 at 15:05
areege says:

i love the efficiency of it all. it s a fantastic leap forward!

 
# May 23, 2009 at 12:29

I think solar energy is going to go mainstream soon. It won’t be long before there is cost parity with conventional fuels. Then it will explode. Awesome stadium!

 
# June 4, 2009 at 08:21
Shafky says:

Mind blasting Project of Toyo Ito’s….
can we see this project Documentation & design please to study it….

shafky

 
# July 5, 2009 at 03:21
Zia says:

May I please know which company implemented this job? I have some projects in my hand in which i might need some clue.

 
# August 29, 2009 at 07:27
Samio says:

No matter how we look at it, it is a very innovative project.

It might not be a cost effective / practical project, but it does make the statement.

Does anyone know what is the maintenance like?
Is there any energy storage media during day time?
Is electricity being fed back to the grid during the peak demand hours?
or
Is it being fed back directly to the grid?
What type of energy storage is it?
What is the efficiency and maintenance requirement?

 
# October 20, 2009 at 23:39

Links to this article »

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

fantastic[+]
Looks like a squid.[+]
sigh. projects like this make me question why i’m...[+]
Absolutely horrendous.[+]
maybe it always has been ! just more out there now[+]
thats how everything seems to be nowadays. I think...[+]
I agree with you, there is much to like about...[+]
I find it really curious that critique has become so...[+]
Great! What are the dimensions of each floor? No...[+]
construction detail 1:10?[+]
any possibility of seeing some wall construction...[+]
Very fun. And to put the bathroom beneath the former...[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »