AD Classics: Torre Velasca / BBPR

Photo by David Orban - http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidorban/

Mixed in with the Gothic Cathedrals, buildings, sculptures and domes of Milan, the Torre Velasca stands out as one of the few modern buildings in the city’s ancient center. The Torre Velasca, planned to loom over its surrounding structures at a height of nearly 1,000 meters, was to be an important addition to Milan’s skyline. For this reason, it was crucial that the architects, , find ways to blend the design of the Torre Velasca, completed in 1958, with that of the classic architectural beauties of historic Milan. More on the design of the Torre Velasca after the break.

Photo by Maurizio Zanetti - http://www.flickr.com/photos/matalyn/

The upper third of the building, which protrudes outward from the lower levels, was designed to resemble medieval watchtowers. Such defense towers were used in times of war to protect Italian castles from invasion. By using the Torre Velasca to build upon the ideas of ancient architecture, BBPR was able to connect the modern building to its historic past and keep the design of the new addition from feeling out of place.

Photo by Leandro Ciuffo - http://www.flickr.com/photos/leandrociuffo/

The tower’s stone material and supporting struts that add stability to the projecting section not only further its resemblance to ’s medieval defense towers, but also mimic some of the Gothic features of its surrounding structures. By looking at Milan’s skyline, it is clear that BBPR designed the Torre Velasca with its surroundings in mind (especially considering the growing trend toward glass curtain walls in high-rises like this one). However, the design had many important functional purposes as well.

Photo by Ferdinando Marfella - http://www.flickr.com/photos/fotofm/

Whereas many newer buildings were constructed along the city’s street fronts, the Torre Velasca was built in the center of its site so as to encourage use of the plaza space. The tower’s narrow bottom not only allowed for the creation of such plaza space, but also fit with the building’s multifunctional purposes. The narrow spaces of the lower floors held shops, offices and exhibitions, while the more spacious upper stories contained apartments with spectacular views overlooking the city.

In many parts of the city, the creation of office buildings was known to push out residential structures. However, the combination of commercial and residential use in the Torre Velasca was meant to prevent the weakening of city centers that typically occurred when office buildings replaced residential ones.

Photo by Olivier Bruchez - http://www.flickr.com/photos/bruchez/

The importance of functionality was even reflected in the tower’s window arrangement. On most modern buildings, schemes of windows, doors and materials are repeated over and over again. However, on the Torre Velasca numerous patterns were created using empty walls, open windows and reflective glass surfaces where windows would normally be expected. This allowed the building to play to the varied needs of the many people using it.

© Luca Volpi / Wikimedia commons

Although the Torre Velasca has been criticized for the building’s heavy feeling and for the intricate details that get lost because of it, many people have praised the way in which the tower has managed to connect Milan’s past to its present. Its functionality paired with the architects’ attention to the surrounding environment made the Torre Velasca a seamless, as well as functional addition to the ancient city of Milan.

Architect: BBPR
Location: Milan, Italy
Project Year: 1956-1958
References: Architecture Week, Arch in Form
Photographs: Flickr: david.orban, Matalyn, leandrociuffo, Nando Scafroglia, Olivier Bruchez, scallejaWikimedia commons: Goldmund100

Cite: Hyatt, Allison. "AD Classics: Torre Velasca / BBPR" 14 Aug 2011. ArchDaily. Accessed 20 Oct 2014. <http://www.archdaily.com/?p=155121>
  • Andre

    Not sure that I’d characterize it as a seamless addition to the skyline..

  • alex

    The building looks hugely intrusive among the skyline, but I suppose that almost anything placed in such a virgin skyline would seem at least slightly out of place.

  • David

    I would have to say it’s an appalling addition to a beautiful city. Looks like the upper half is being held up by temporary support beams as if the structure was left incomplete.