the world's most visited architecture website

Sign up now and start saving and organizing your favorite architecture projects and photos

Sign up now to save and organize your favorite architecture projects


Find the most inspiring products for your projects in our Product Catalog.

Find the most inspiring products in our Product Catalog.


Get the ArchDaily Chrome Extension and be inspired with every new tab. Install here »


All over the world, architects are finding cool ways to re-use run-down old buildings. Click here to see the best in Refurbishment Architecture.

Want to see the coolest refurbishment projects? Click here.


Immerse yourself in inspiring buildings with our selection of 360 videos. Click here.

See our immersive, inspiring 360 videos. Click here.

Navigate articles using your keyboard
  1. ArchDaily
  2. Articles
  3. Eliminating Obstacles for Architects in Government Contracts

Eliminating Obstacles for Architects in Government Contracts

Eliminating Obstacles for Architects in Government Contracts

Today, Krueck+Sexton Architects principle Thomas Jacobs, AIA, testified before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Small Business, Subcommittee on Contracting and Workforce in an effort to urge Congress to eliminate two impediments facing small architecture firms as they compete for government contracts. Jacobs argues that high design-build fees and lengthy “final teams lists” are prohibiting small firms from competing.

Continue after the break to read more.

The average firm spends over $260,000 to prepare a design-build bid. At a time when the construction industry lost 28,000 jobs last month, Jacob believes that small architectural firms should not have to spend such a large sum in order to prepare a bid where there is a slim chance of winning the job. Many small firms simply cannot afford the risk.

Not only is competing for government contracts cost-prohibitive for small firms, but large final list teams are adding to the issue. In the past, there were typically no more than three teams competing for a project. Now, government agencies are requiring as many as eight teams on a final list. As a result, the odds of small firms winning projects are becoming slim, as larger firms can absorb the cost of bidding.

Meanwhile, expanding the federal government’s use of Design Excellence programs would enable more small businesses to compete for government business and ensure that the government buys design services with both cost and quality as equal criteria, Jacobs said.

“At a time when the federal government is facing unprecedented deficits, we need to ensure that every dollar spent on federal facilities is spent wisely,” said Jacobs. “Ensuring the most qualified designers are selected at the outset of the project reaps financial benefits for years to come.”

“The design excellence program streamlines the architect/engineering selection process while stressing creativity in designing the buildings,” said Jacobs.

Via The American Institute of Architects

About this author
Karissa Rosenfield

See more:

Cite: Karissa Rosenfield. "Eliminating Obstacles for Architects in Government Contracts " 07 Jun 2012. ArchDaily. Accessed . <> ISSN 0719-8884
Read comments