This video clearly explains the concept for SO-IL‘s winning proposal for the P.S.1 summer installation we presented you yesterday. Now it is easier to understand the concept proposed by Pole Dance, encouraging people to move the structure to create a dynamic space.
And as we have done for the last 2 years, expect a full coverage of this years summer installation.
We recently received one of the limited editions (n=500) of eVolo Skycrapers. At 1224 pages (9″ x 11.5″ x 2.5″), it is less of a coffee table book than it is an actual table. The book grew out of…
As you well know already we love MARK Magazine, and this issue fails to disappoint. It has projects from many of the architects we have featured here on ArchDaily such as, StudioGreenBlue, Heri&Salli, Clavel Arquitectos, Kengo Kuma, Colboc Franzen, Studio Velocity, Takeshi Hosaka, Fuhrimann Hachler, Toyo Ito, Nieto Sobejano, L3P…
Architectural Lighting: Designing with Light and Space / Hervé Descottes with Cecilia E. Ramos
As part of Architecture Briefs series, produced by The Foundations of Architecture, this short book on lighting gives a very good introduction into architectural lighting. The authors start by explaining the six visual principles of light; illuminance, luminance,…
hi could somebody tell me the name of the video’s song? og and the proyect yeahh its kinda nice…
It’s Paul Simon, “Me and Julio Down by the Schoolyard”. I feel this design was intended to be sat upon and not under. It’s funny how the music plays to “enhance” the video of poles randomly swaying back and forth. I look forward to seeing it in real life but, the video is as hard to grasp as the renderings.
clearly explains? i agree with Dan, i don’t think this is very well explained at all. the balls are dropped from the sky or just sit there – im assuming that part was an artistic touch?
the design, in my opinion, is a terrible winning entry. last years winner was socially responsible and way more beautiful. this is a shame, i was looking forward to the PS1 project. yes “dynamic space” is cool, but it’s been done a million times and isn’t ever all that interesting.
this year’s winner (based on the renderings & video) isn’t socially responsible, conceptually interesting, or even aesthetically pleasing. a big disappointment thus far, but i’ll withhold final judgement til i see it in person .
This is not a clear explanation, and I think the clouds idea would have made for a far more interesting and fun winning entry.
Could only hear audio. Couldn’t see the video so not very clear to me.