Visit our Products section to learn more about architectural products.

Dalian Shide stadium / NBBJ

By Sebastian J — Filed under: Sports Architecture , ,
 

1253026397-dalian-stadium-05

NBBJ’s proposed design for the new Dalian Shide football stadium in China represents a new direction in sports architecture by moving away from the creation of a building based on pure form. The organic architecture of the building challenges the typical stadium typology to become more than an impressive skin wrapped around an ordinary seating bowl.

More images and full architect’s description after the break.

Designed to emulate a garden, NBBJ’s Garden Stadium has only what is needed to thrive, and those functions are clearly organized and expressed. This simple effectiveness in design leads to a dramatically improved fan experience as well as greater ease of operations. In addition, the building’s carbon footprint is minimized, making Garden Stadium a part of a larger sustainable community.

1253026388-dalian-stadium-04

The reclaimed site captures a new place in the city, with spectacular views across the ocean and out to the mountains and center city. Growing from this new coastal park, the design proposes that the land is folded open to create two garden walls, which support the venue, inserting the bowl between them. The walls become iconic elements, creating a strong and visually striking support system while leaving the ends open to connect the event inside to its urban context on the outside. The roof is a flexible system of cables and fabric to protect the fans from the elements, beautiful and unique, fluttering overhead.

1253026380-dalian-stadium-03-concourse

This concept was developed as a response to recent stadia design trends, which focus on powerful exterior designs, but have not yet improved upon the interior bowl experience. Even in the highly publicized stadiums recently built in China, the typical approach to the bowl has not yet evolved to influence the exterior design. The proposed design for the Garden Stadium transforms this traditional approach by dramatically opening the seating bowl to the city of Dalian. This openness not only creates a more integrated experience for those seated in the bowl and walking on the concourses, but it also allows a connection to the site and city surrounding the stadium, allowing the local community to be a part of the event.

1253026370-dalian-stadium-02

The garden walls contain all of the vital systems of the building: the structure for the roof, the VIP suites, the toilets and concessions stands, the mechanical spaces, and the ticket booths. The main concourse is continuously open to the field–unlike most stadiums where concourses are separate spaces with few views into the bowl-and this new openness retains a spectator’s constant connection with the action. The walls are clad, facing outwards in living plants that change color and character depending on the four seasons-adding carbon-reducing plants where one would normally find an expanse of concrete and steel. The wall is clad on the inside, facing the concourse with giant LED panels, powered by on-site renewable energy, which changes instantly, compared to the outer wall which changes only naturally.

1253026360-dalian-stadium-01

This stadium has the capacity to ultimately become a global icon for sustainable design by reducing energy consumption, improving energy efficiency, contributing to clean air, and developing a sustainable community. Utilizing these sustainable concepts as core design principals, the Garden Stadium performs as an environmentally responsible design and creates a unique iconic image for the site and for the city of Dalian.

Sustainable Elements:

GREEN WALLS: Provide building insulation, reduces energy use, reduces heat island effect, filters air pollution, reduces green house gases, softens the typical hard edge of a stadium.
WATER REUSE: A holistic water recycling system can dramatically reduce water waste and can be used for irrigation, fire fighting, toilet flushing, and air conditioning.
RENEWABLE POWER: Create energy sources on the site by integrating wind turbines and solar cells into the building walls, roof and site.
POROUS SITE PAVING: Large site application to slow the rate of water run-off and reduce the impact on storm water drains.
EFFICIENCY: Improve overall building insulation and airtightness.
PRE-FABRICATION: Factory pre-fabricate as many building components as possible. The factory could be temporarily created on site.

1253026343-dalian-stadium-drawing-site-01

1253026333-dalian-stadium-drawing-section-02

1253026325-dalian-stadium-diagram-06-new-stadium

new stadium section

site section concept

folding land concept

 

77 comments »

Vitsee says:

WOW that is amazing!… but the balls gonna end up in the sea at somepoint.

 
# September 15, 2009 at 11:50
mankichi says:

nice!!!!!!!!

 
# September 15, 2009 at 11:59
Fran says:

The same family than Souto de Mura’s Braga stadium but in a more contemporean way. Furthermore this one is not splited in two like in Braga so it doesn’t break the unity of the spectators.
Many good ideas but the formal langage is kind of odd.

 
# September 15, 2009 at 12:14
Kees Haars says:

Wow! Is this a commission? Or did they win a competition or something?

 
# September 15, 2009 at 12:19
Tom W says:

How does the roof “protect the fans from the elements”? It looks great, but doesn’t seem like it will shelter the crowd from rain. Or is it just providing shade?

 
# September 15, 2009 at 12:24
Jinx says:

Great concept to interact with the city, the experience inside and the low carbon emission.
But slicing up the land is getting very old, I think is see these land slicing concepts at least twice a month. Although this is on a whole different scale. I think hooligans will destroy the bottom layers of green, or don’t they exist in China?

The semi-interiors and even more so the roof look very interesting, but also very vague in these renders.

 
# September 15, 2009 at 12:37
Orky says:

Hmm… The description seems to have a lot of fluff to it. The sustainable features list are good ideas but how are they rigorously applied to this building? Where is the performance analysis?

Also, how does that roof piece “become more than an “impressive skin” wrapped around an ordinary seating bowl”?…what is the function? It certainly won’t protect against rain… It seems like a very idiosyncratic design move that will cast a lot of strange shadows onto the playing field.

There are some interesting ideas about bowl/concourse design… but overall the design seems strange and incoherent…

Too many parts not enough rigor…

 
# September 15, 2009 at 12:47
    YOURMOM'slover says:

    Orky says: “let me be a hater and say the typical things that makes me look critical —but really nitpick at little things that already solved and just not shown…”"and I say incoherent cause my male organ is incoherent”

     
    # September 15, 2009 at 13:06
      Orky says:

      You win. You are truly the superior critic.

      Since you seem to know just how well resolved the design is, perhaps you can do the readers a favor and allow Arch Daily to post some details on the “solved but not shown” magic roof piece.

      While you are at it, please show how the sustainable elements are integrated into the design. The text mentions solar panels and wind turbines… where are they and why aren’t they depicted? How much energy will they really generate for the site?

      I’m not nitpicking. These are huge loose ends to what seem to be important design features as outlined in the narrative.

       
      # September 15, 2009 at 14:28
    YOURMOM'slover says:

    calm down homie…you got this much time to be B******G on Arch DAily???….get some time with your girl or man or whatever, stop letting contemporary architecture and post-critical viewport f-u in the A….i just made that comment to mess with you and all the typical angry 30 somethings here on Arch Daily….say what you want on this site….but CHILL—

     
    # September 16, 2009 at 00:40
      MT Durban says:

      pot calling the kettle black

       
      # September 16, 2009 at 14:02
      CW says:

      You sound really smart…you should talk on here more often.

       
      # September 16, 2009 at 18:31
      Y says:

      @Orky …

      Nice comments, i agree with your analysis. Thanks for do it and to improve the level of the discussion at archdaily.

      Let’s just to ignore the mindless kids and focus on what matters here: Good Architecture and Bad Architecture.

       
      # September 17, 2009 at 08:56
Yorik says:

I think that “layer” of “stuff” that forms the roof is extremely interesting… It is not really a roof anymore, but it provides *some* of the functions of a roof… And open at both sides, like a loaf of bread, very cool concepts, well done!

 
# September 15, 2009 at 12:50
English0019 says:

That’s thinking outside the box. Well thought out design I love it!

 
# September 15, 2009 at 12:53
Alexandre Collaço says:

Very beautiful images, the openness of the stadium seems to be a good idea people from outside can catch the vitality and vibration of the inside, and the sea view is nice too.
About the sustainable features, looks like a cake recipe. And I agree about this roof, no protection at all and odd shadows.

Interesting and different stadium typology.

 
# September 15, 2009 at 13:08
Just the Facts says:

The seating bowl is very reminiscent of Piano’s stadium in Bari.

 
# September 15, 2009 at 13:53
Jason says:

Fantastic presentation material. Great stadium design. Looks like a fun place to watch a game.

 
# September 15, 2009 at 14:01
cad says:

One hellafresh stadium.

 
# September 15, 2009 at 14:30
aufi alwi says:

wow amazing rendering…..could be done by what software i imagine

 
# September 15, 2009 at 14:35
kc says:

looks like a place for thousands of people to hang dry their laundry

 
# September 15, 2009 at 14:46
    archit student says:

    this is the funniest criticism LOL
    and so true!!!

     
    # September 16, 2009 at 05:20
Lasse Lyhne says:

In 2007 a diploma student in Aarhus School of Architecture did a project that was a much better reaction to the only introvert and unsituated stadions..

This is cool too though.. I like the impact of the slicing concept, and if it is possible with bridges it should be possible with architecture…

 
# September 15, 2009 at 15:03
titi says:

nice images and concepts, but I wonder how it could look like once built…

 
# September 15, 2009 at 15:38
Dustin says:

I am wondering if you actually wont see the bridge going over the ocean instead of the ocean? I think lots of this project is good image trickery. It is a great concept though, we have seen stadiums with great views though so that is not new but overall great ideas.

 
# September 15, 2009 at 16:08
bill says:

Very beautiful project.
I like the concept too of integrating with the city – something China needs between their estranged architecture and its people.

 
# September 15, 2009 at 16:23
al gaddor says:

:P i don’t understand but i think the guy who project this doesn’t understand the game,, it’s about the spectator too but,,,the game!!!! the game!!!!
when your team lost the game you’ll can cry looking the sunset… too poetic for diehard fans :)
i’m tired about this cheerleader-type of stadiums :D

 
# September 15, 2009 at 16:26
    Dan says:

    agreed! give me Stamford Bridge any day over this!

     
    # September 15, 2009 at 17:37
s.e.r.g.i.o. says:

soto da moura + piercing??.

 
# September 15, 2009 at 17:13
Tee says:

This is the ultimate answer to all the boring round stadium we were complaning about!
Well done!

 
# September 15, 2009 at 17:42
    Rionz says:

    Agree, we have seen many round stadiums with awesome skins, so many, that turns more in esculptures rather than great buildings, this master project is beyond that, just to cool XD, i could die of hapiness if I play there a match. XD

     
    # September 15, 2009 at 19:51
sozcelykk says:

impressive

 
# September 15, 2009 at 17:51
helen says:

i dont think its that impressive other than having a portion of the stadium cut out and seats separated from the skin. also, why would there be access from the beach area if it would almost definitely be blocked off anyway? then it wouldnt quite be opened would it? seems like a fancy way to add a wall to some bleachers. and i can also defintiely foresee the sculptural roofing a lighting issue both for spectators and the players. wat about grass growth? it IS a football stadium for a football team…

for some reason the section feels MORE constrained than the traditional bowl.

 
# September 15, 2009 at 18:57
Tarek sakkal says:

ok

 
# September 15, 2009 at 20:12
ov says:

SOM did a roofscape back in the early 2000’s for Changi International airport. It was just recently completed in 2007. This project reminds me of their solution.
http://www.som.com/content.cfm/changi_international_airport_terminal_3

 
# September 15, 2009 at 20:36
    José says:

    hehehe, nice one. I love to see how ideas evolve ( are copied and transformed, a bit ). But anyway you can always spot similarities between projects, I haven’t seem until today an absolute creation, a project where you can’t find copied things.

     
    # September 15, 2009 at 21:31
    as says:

    ya, SOM won a PA award for that roof many years ago… pre-internet mass media…back when you had to buy magazines… hehe

     
    # October 7, 2009 at 04:52
CJ says:

This is just beautiful, it’s taking stadiums architecture to another level, (not saying it’s the right one or anything) but I like what I’m seeing.

 
# September 15, 2009 at 21:06
febri says:

woowww..!! is mooi..

 
# September 15, 2009 at 21:09
cc_juan says:

How bout reflection and shadow caused by the roof on field???
Are the player still can feel comfortable when playing…..??? a lot of stadium recently… have this problem……

 
# September 15, 2009 at 23:48
    MK says:

    Those shadows will piss off every player on that field, epecially if there is movement amongst all those shade panels. So many of these grandiose designs fail utterly when they spend all their effort thinking above the clouds and miss the core of what needs to happen on the ground. Without that any design losses its validity. This reminds me of the formerly reflective side of the LA Symphony Hall where they had to buff down the surface because it heated up all the offices an apartments across from it. A mirror-like wall facing the sun in LA? Don’t miss the obvious for the glorious.

     
    # September 16, 2009 at 01:25
viniruski says:

The superfluous and dysfunctional elements are plenty, and are sure to be value engineered, but I applaud the creative energy that produced this presentation. NBBJ? Really?

 
# September 16, 2009 at 02:20
dacoup says:

Nice, but some parts of the design look really like Souto de Moura stadium in Braga, Portugal …

 
# September 16, 2009 at 02:35
archit student says:

judging from the bird eye view,
do people just walk into the stadium?

 
# September 16, 2009 at 05:23
architist says:

Thats one master peice!!!! interesting to see it blended with nature

 
# September 16, 2009 at 06:27
Emerson Gámez B. says:

me he quedao sin palabras, simplemente excelente. es lo mas lindo que he visto en cuanto a arquitectura deportiva se trata.

 
# September 16, 2009 at 11:20
Max Fabris says:

I really like the design, I mean, the idea, of the ground can change at some point into walls. It turns everything into public space.

 
# September 16, 2009 at 12:26
Allan says:

The author makes it sound like this type of thought put into a stadium as never been done before (“represents a new direction in sports architecture by moving away from the creation of a building based on pure form.”)

Hello! Have you not looked at the Dallas Cowboys Stadium that was just completed?

 
# September 16, 2009 at 14:13

One cool design, fresh and different. If it works or not are things to be worked out, like the comments above suggest, but you can’t deny the design approach and inventiveness. Cool stuff.

 
# September 16, 2009 at 15:11
Artsy Fartsy says:

Nice Pictures, interesting concept, not practical.

 
# September 16, 2009 at 19:31
pfelds says:

i agree with one of the previous posts, the roof will cast dizzying shadows upon the pitch, i mean can you imagine you have a 2-ish hour game, the sun will move considerably thruout that time, so the shadows will bend and stretch and move like crazy, that would be rough on all parties(cameramen/t.v. audience, players, fans) a futbol is small and white, and is easily lost between shadow and direct sun in solid roofed stadia, if the ball quiiickly canged from bight white to gray and back multiple times in just one cross or clearing, that would surely be an eyesore………..

it seems very very spacey(not closed in/cavernous, which may seem neat and new, but the reason this isnt a usable idea is that futbol matches tend to be spectator experiences, the noise is meant to be trapped within, creating an atmosphere and aiding the home side while deflating to away team, to let that atmosphere escape so readily is surely haphazard and ill-thought,

otherwise it seems cool enough

 
# September 17, 2009 at 08:34
may yusuf says:

AMAZINE…………

 
# September 29, 2009 at 06:00
AL says:

Brillian project!! Brilliant copy!!!! Eheheheh… If you take off all the fuss that you only can get with the help of 3D renders, you obtain exactly the Braga Stadium, built a few years ago in Portugal… Original, hun? But in Portugal, the simplicity and the proven functionality doesn’t allow the project to “appear” in fantastic (but unreal) images around the world just to fill the eye…

 
# September 29, 2009 at 07:32
SS says:

OMG! What a big piece of cr*p!
Ok, you want to make it look like an art gallery, it’s your right. But leave the roof over the pitch alone! Don’t make that mess!

 
# September 30, 2009 at 06:50
tomnguyen says:

like a thousand of birds fly up to the sky. wonderful one. hope it come into life

 
# October 1, 2009 at 00:30
nm4architectoftheyear says:

This building is truly brilliant! Absolute genius architecture!

 
# October 1, 2009 at 14:47
mzlxy says:

so, it’s going to be built in my hometown.
en, look good, but i don’t like the landscape around it.
another long long way to go before you get in. empty with nothing can interact with.

 
# November 29, 2009 at 10:21

Links to this article »

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

BANG COCK[+]
El Centro Pompidou fue terminado en 1977…[+]
I agree with the comment of ema, any architect should take...[+]
The archetype form they show for a yurt doesn’t even look correct. It looks more...[+]
a Beaubourg coming a little bit late[+]
kudos for that lovely spill of irony…[+]
I can not realize that, how architects can still design useless rooftops in a city like...[+]
“inspiration from the yurt”??? “the team transformed the traditional...[+]
archilocus on Ordos Hotel / EXH Design:
The object itself is appealing, but if the architects really wanted to make a stack...[+]
I have the same complaint. I remember sitting in...[+]
Jesse Lockhart-Krause on Media-TIC / Enric Ruiz Geli:
It’s great to see that the ‘high tech’ movement is...[+]
I don’t know what a ‘mayor energetic load’ is, but I definately want...[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »