Zufferey House / Nunatak Sàrl Architectes

Jul 2009

Uploaded by Nico Saieh — Filed under: Houses ,Selected , Concrete, Nunatak Sàrl Architectes, Switzerland, Wood

▼

Add this to My Bookmarks:

share by email

share by email

Architect: Nunatak Sàrl Architectes
Location: Wallis, Switzerland
Project team: Vassaux Roland, Chervaz Joël, Vassaux Raymond, Scrufari Philippe, Cretton David, Chassot Philippe
Constructed Area: 182 sqm
Project year: 2003
Photographs: Dominique MarcWehrli

Architecture

« L’Ardévaz », is the name of that mountain. It is located above the site at the north. Its shape and material structure is the unique inspiration to plan the house. Formally, the house looks like a stone block lying on the ground in a fragile balance. It is covered with a skin of natural slates.

The sloppy roof is in harmony with the east and west sides of the mountain. The fitting’ slates is an image of the stone stratum.

The openings remind of the horizontal marks of the old career’s path.

Their dimension and position frame the landscape from the first front to the background: vineyards, hillside and mountains.

section

The unusual aspect of the project does not respect exactly the rules of the local construction regulations. It was finally considered, with courage, like a variation of the traditional roof to two flaps.

The repartition of the familial functions does not follow the usual” best” orientation in that part of the Wallis. The outside extensions of the main living area, like terrace and garden, are located on the east and south sides so that to prevent family life from western wind and hot summer temperature.

Material

For economic reasons and comfort, the house was erected with a prefabricated wood framework with an interior coating in painted wood particle panels and protected from outside with an insulation coat and numerous ranges of slates placed in the same way to the roof’slope.
Roof and floor structure are in “massive” fir planks keeping their natural aspect.

Heating system is integrated inside the floor concrete slab creating an “active slab”.

The flooring is composed by a grey and rough concrete screed directly applicated on the slab.
Choice and implementation of the materials were systematically simplified so that to reduce the costs that a shape of sophistication would have increased. Less is more….

: plan 01

: plan 02

: plan 03

: east elevation

: north elevation

: section

Cite:
Saieh , Nico . "Zufferey House / Nunatak Sàrl Architectes" 08 Jul 2009. ArchDaily. Accessed 04 Feb 2012. <http://www.archdaily.com/28262>

Comments (24)
Tweets (0)
Links to this entry (9)

Design Metafeed says:

#architecture Zufferey House / Nunatak Sàrl Architectes:
Architect: Nunatak Sàrl Architectes Locat.. http://bit.ly/yGdzK

# July 9, 2009 at 00:42

INawe says:

I didn’t think it could happen but it has… Its a UFO in a form that isn’t a blob. :/

As a building its too much of a one liner for me. Nice… not amazing.

# July 9, 2009 at 01:04

thomas foral says:

Zufferey House / Nunatak Sàrl Architectes | ArchDaily – http://shar.es/hiDx

# July 9, 2009 at 01:47

kez says:

Absolutely amazing =)

A touch of whimsy – fantastic

# July 9, 2009 at 03:01

Amandazz says:

Now this is what ima talkin’ about….;) Lovely!!

# July 9, 2009 at 04:58

Richie says:

Though the form seems totally arbitrary in relation to the internal planning it does make it fit better as an object in the landscape (I had to laugh at the description calling it a “sloppy roof”!).. I like the materiality also.

# July 9, 2009 at 05:30

Arvin says:

a strong image, but nothing more than that.. the interiors appear to be designed by a 1st year undergrad student and the materials just don’t fit the building! like i said, a strong ‘concept’ (reminds me of MVRDV) but poorly executed! what a disappointment..

# July 9, 2009 at 05:37

Lasse says:

I agree with you Arvin..

The interior seems to fight the concept instead of trying to bennefit from it.

I miss a visual connection on the lenght axis of the house (the tube), exposing the connection earth-mountain/sky.

# July 9, 2009 at 09:16

Rick says:

I don’t see how a mountain can inspire nothing but the gratuitous formality of a “balanced” tilted box – unless we’re thinking about a landslide flattening the hill. A ball could have the very same conceptual justification. Or a banana. I hope those get built right next to this, to complete the picture. Courageous, alright, to say the least.

# July 9, 2009 at 11:20

Oldesque urbanbike ! says:

http://bit.ly/QMhjV Cette maison n’est pas plantée dans le sol…!
Volume perdu dans le galetas ou circulation d’air chaud…? Nunatak archis.

# July 9, 2009 at 11:38

Juca says:

I gotta agree with Arvin and Amandazz. Those bedrooms just could not have been designed by an architect! Too bad to be true!

# July 9, 2009 at 12:21

tommo says:

At first glance it looks like someone’s accidentally dropped a very large static caravan from a great height into a field. But sorry, trying to hide the evidence by changing the windows and talking about its relationship with the mountain really doesn’t cut the cheese for me.
Yes it could be interesting i agree, but it feels too heavy handed.
Oh and Arvin – I’M a first year undergrad student and I really really hope that my interiors have more imagination and less (yellow, look at the bathroom) concrete.

# July 9, 2009 at 13:50

anonymous says: