Visit our Products section to learn more about architectural products.

Korean Pavillion for Shanghai Expo 2010 / Mass Studies

By Sebastian J — Filed under: News , , , ,
 

Our friends from Mass Studies sent us their design for the Korean Pavillion for the Shanghai World Expo in 2010.

The Korean Pavillion is situated in Zone A, directly neighboring the Japan Pavillion and the Saudi Arabia Pavillion, and in close proximity to the China Pavilion. The site is around 6000m2, and it is one of the largest lots within the expo compound.

Located on the perimeter of the zone, the site takes advantage of the views out towards the Huangpu River and the Shanghai skyline in the distance.

More images and architect’s description after the break.

Concept
With land culture (China) and sea culture (Japan) surrounding the peninsula, Korea has been permeable to imported cultures and global influences, whose progressive mix defines contemporary Korean society. Using ‘convergence’ as the main theme, the Korea Pavilion is an amalgamation of ‘sign’ (symbol) and ‘space’: Signs become spaces, and simultaneously, spaces become signs.

Sign as Space
Han-geul, the Korean alphabet, is the prime element of ‘signs’ within the pavilion. The overall volume, lifted 7.2m above ground level, is created by converging these Han-geul letters, allowing signs to create the exhibition space, and so that the visitors can experience their geometry through horizontal, vertical and diagonal movements. The primary geometries that compose the Han-geul letters are universal to other cultures, thus acting as a sort of ‘open’ set of signs that is engaging to everyone.

The exterior surfaces of the Korea Pavilion are clad in 2 types of pixels: Han-geul Pixels and Art Pixels. Han-geul Pixels are white panels with a relief of letters in four different sizes whose combination forms the majority of the exterior, mainly the peripheral surfaces. Most of the non-peripheral surfaces are composed of Art Pixels, which are 45cm x 45cm aluminum panels created by a Korean artist, Ik-Joong Kang, who is renowned for creating massive art walls out of small hand-painted tiles, either self-produced or by gathering from around the world (thus being another type of convergence). About 40,000 of these panels will texture the façade, contributing a bright palette of colors, hope, and unity throughout the Korea Pavilion.
The surfaces will project different atmospheres during the day and night, with light and shadows creating different textures. Sequential lighting is installed behind the Hangeul Pixels to highlight the individual letters on the exterior façade at night, further animating the pavilion as a sign (like a text message) on a larger scale.

Space as Sign
By understanding a map to be a type of a sign that depicts space, we’ve translated the ground level piloti space as a sign, by making an abstract 1/300 scale 3D map of a characteristic Korean city as its surface. The rest of the building, containing the exhibition space, is suspended 7m above to create a 40m x 77m free, open space generated by the map. The map becomes a semi-exterior landscape that expresses the converging of mountains, water, and a dense metropolitan area, as exemplified by Seoul, the national capital. This ground floor is shaded by the main volume and additionally cooled by the a replica of a river (modeled after the Han River) flowing from one corner to the other as a 5m wide, 79m long artificial stream, while the notable mountains become stages/seating/spaces for the visitors to enjoy shows while queued in line to enter the exhibition space above, to improve the typical inverted condition that most visitors spend more time waiting than experiencing the exhibition itself. There is also a series of LFD monitors, a large LFD screen and two water screen projections to assist the interaction with the visitors.

Program
Upon entering the second level of the pavilion, the floor opens up to a gigantic 3,700m2 exhibition space, that is enclosed in complete darkness, to provide a controlled environment for the exhibition. We take advantage of the space by opening it up as an open flat plane, to be able to handle an extremely heavy load of visitor traffic. The level above contains the VIP Lounge, Press Room, Conference Room, and programs for the staff and administration.

On the opposite end of the exhibition space (at the north-western side of the building) is a restaurant with its own self-operating circulation, and an access to a roof garden that overlooks the Huangpu River and Shanghai’s skyline.

 

24 comments »

jonasll says:

and how much is that suppose to cost???

 
# April 15, 2009 at 11:37
    Roberto says:

    Besides, it’s horrible.

     
    # August 24, 2009 at 12:51
NMiller says:

ok… isn’t this a little big to be classified as a pavilion? normally I’m not one to get caught up on preconceived notions of scale, form, or anything… but seriously… this is big isn’t it? (same goes for other pavilions in this expo)

 
# April 15, 2009 at 11:50
arch critic says:

sometimes architects need to ask one question….WHY?

 
# April 15, 2009 at 12:10
Lucas Gray says:

It looks a heck of a lot like Steven holl’s dorm project for MIT but with tiny (and huge) Korean letters all over it.

 
# April 15, 2009 at 12:27
roadkill says:

lego must be rubbing their hands with delight! can’t believe the PLOT crap approach to architecture is spreading far and wide… these guys have serious unresolved childhood issues.

 
# April 15, 2009 at 13:21
Quertas says:

Sorry but……..no go

 
# April 15, 2009 at 13:50
thiago says:

I just think… Why do architects are still trying to find these figurative and obvious schemes to explain some awful designs? Why aren’t they preoccupied in designing with more important things in mind like, “letters”. Please architects, stop being immature.

That’s why architecture is always an “in crisis” profession and no one really cares about it, except another immature architect.

 
# April 15, 2009 at 13:50
intella says:

it all started in Nederlands, blame it on the Dutch …

 
# April 15, 2009 at 14:28
the neo says:

maaaaates, what did niemeyer say when he heard the massive critics about his plannings for brasilia:

“you can like or not not, but you’ve definitly never seen something like this before.”

in my opinion this project is bad that much… see it as a fresh idea, and lets be curious what we can expect from realisation and if you know some of the other works of mass studies you would know that their realisations are definitly high qual…

so enjoy freshness!

 
# April 15, 2009 at 15:25
_panza says:

I dont understand why the heck architecture cannot be funny? Okay, its childlish…and? some people are too pathetic..

 
# April 15, 2009 at 16:16
scarpasez says:

This project is awful.

Subtract the multitude of colorful, dancing people from the renders, replace the clear blue sky with the smoggy grey of Shanghai, , add dirt and weather and you have a depressing and oppressive piece of architecture.

I’m all for optimism and the hope that architecture may serve to elevate, but architects need to be real in how they visualize their work. These renders have the look and feel of an American pharmaceutical advertisement, which is to say, it does not reflect life, and this work, should it be constructed, will be a grim monument to empty hopes set upon a drab slab of concrete. Context, please, context.

 
# April 15, 2009 at 21:17
Ala says:

The composition of smaller pieces makes the building look bigger than it really is. It has the same “scaless affect” as Steven Holl’s Simmons hall dorm at MIT.

 
# April 15, 2009 at 21:50
archdork says:

architecture as signage isn’t such a new fresh concept. But I do agree that Architecture could be fun and amusing. why not? Aren’t those questions of “why not?” and “what if?” the questions always come in the process of realizing our/architects ultimate egos?

 
# April 15, 2009 at 22:05
Palau says:

muy recargado……

 
# April 15, 2009 at 22:08
way says:

muy recargado……2x

 
# April 16, 2009 at 02:57
archdork says:

what?

 
# April 16, 2009 at 22:29
K says:

The physical model is amazing…sure the renderings are quite bad and out of context and what not, the project approach is quite shallow but the end result looks fun. It is extremely playful, I don’t mind it that much.

 
# May 16, 2009 at 00:44
sleezy says:

scarpasez, mayb they’re more of a realist than a optimist.

 
# May 22, 2009 at 12:17
PlaceAndBeing says:

the final product of this project seems to fail to reflect its own concept statement and philosophy. The idea of using Korean alphabets to create signs that sculpt and form space sounds interesting, however, Korean letters are always written in combination of two sets of alphabets. With only one set of alphabets used in this building, the alphabets have no meaning to people and do not work as signs. This may have worked on the outside of the building where the set of alphabets became more abstract and created interesting geometry of forms. But as these massive alphabet structures consist of even smaller alphabets, not only they wouldnt’t work as signs, they became a major distraction and an unnecessary cheesy decorations that costs more to realize and brings no clear benefits no meaning and no purpose.

 
# May 26, 2009 at 09:29
s says:

I like the idea of using Korean alpabets.
However there’re too much details.
personally, if the design emphasised the letters simply by colour or something, not composition of small letters, it wouldn’t be disordered.

 
# June 24, 2009 at 04:25
RT says:

I read some of the comments,I think besides the scale and form, we should give Korea credits on creating a “pavilion” that truly represent their culture. They respect their culture and want to spread it through architectural language from inside out the building,I think the concept is brilliant and it’s hard to accomplish. For other countries’ pavilions they are just another fancy building which is hard to be distinguished from one another. They embrace universal quality however are lack of vernacular characteristics.

 
# June 30, 2009 at 16:54
N.N. says:

I don’t like it, i preffer the antique french style like in ” The Universelle Exposition of paris 1900″

 
# July 24, 2009 at 00:15
karam says:

architecture like this isn’t usful at all

 
# August 1, 2009 at 11:09

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

another amazing wooden icicle[+]
they are looking for student! -Http://news.barkdesign.com...[+]
Beautiful response where the building and site share...[+]
@TJ sure, budget is always a concern, when isn’t...[+]
Horrible[+]
It looks like a style from of a basic 1970’s home ideas book, maybe...[+]
That screen is such a waste![+]
ballistamagazine on Waiuku Church / Jasmax:
Nice project, but that drop ceiling definitely downplays the...[+]
this has to be translated text…if...[+]
i agree with Squidly, it feels like a hallow architecture...[+]
I would love to work with them. Have they...[+]
C’est qui ce MVRDV ???[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »