The concept for the new UNO Charter School by STL Architects has been conceived as a response to the organization’s bold vision for the Latino community in Chicago. Rather than replicate a tired, traditional school archetype solution, the design embraces the challenge of modernity with heroic determination. The heart of the building is an abstract yet powerful multinational expression of the neighborhood cultural identity – an environment to fuel the aspirations of students and community. More images and architects’ description after the break.
The building program is arranged around a courtyard space which acts as an entry area, as well as a visual reference for the building. Student circulation is arranged around the courtyard, and classrooms are organized within the outside perimeter. Different programmatic requirements flow through the building, and establish double height common areas that project towards the community. This approach provides the concept with a dual reading. To the outside world, the school radiates activity through the use of a continuous, translucent exterior facade. Internally, the school’s courtyard – the heart of the building – holds the identity of the community.
This is articulated through the use of the curtain wall which displays the colors of different Chicago-based Hispanic flags which are represented as an abstract yet powerful multinational kaleidoscopic expression of the neighborhood’s cultural identity. A statistical analysis was performed of the colors represented in each flag and the percentage of the population represented by each nationality in Chicago. This resulted in a colorful approach to represent not only the identity of the school, but the entire community.
-
- Courtesy of STL Architects
-
- Courtesy of STL Architects
-
- plaza 01
-
- plaza 02
-
- interior patio
-
- assembly and cafeteria
-
- floor plans
-
- elevations
-
- building elements
OMA ripoff. even the diagrams.
pointless comment
@nathan. what a moron.
ArchDaily, where everyone thinks that every work of architecture must be 100% original. What a joke.
More pointlessness: It reminds me a lot of BIG’s proposal for the Quebec museum; continuous folded surface, large areas of glazing with diagonal structure visible, stairs leading up the lifted areas. Not to mention the snow scene renderings appear to have been done by the same firm.
http://www.archdaily.com/57324/musee-national-des-beaux-arts-du-quebec-proposal-big-fugere-architectes/
Still, cool project and it’s awesome to know that this could come to the US and A.
@nathan – yes you are absolutely correct, but its not so much of an OMA rip off as a Jeanne Gang rip off, who used to work at OMA – and has been a major influence for her work. STL on the other hand just copy, and paste.
@Chris – also correct – I would guess this firm basically spends all their time studying BIG in awe of their actual talent, and try to replicate it.
Clearly this kind of work and design process will never be more than a replica of a replica. Take a look at their other projects – the only consistent work is whats trending.
@Felix – be careful when you fall off your high horse. Where is your work? why don’t you let the world judge it as simplistically as you do other’s?