It is no secret that reflective, intellectual, and theoretical work has accompanied the authors of classic architectural works and related disciplines: from treatises, manuals, and books to other printed or digital publications that have transformed their content based on historical, political, social, and technological contexts, to name a few.
Furthermore, the endless controversy and tension generated by the theory-praxis debate, which has at times been a tacit affront, is occasionally diluted into subtle questioning of everything that cannot be materialized within the discipline of architecture. All those square meters that are not quantifiable, and the ideas that do not fit into the traditional vision of the artisan who plans and executes, continue to permeate the academic and professional field. Moreover, architectural criticism, as well as various fields of knowledge focused on research, constitute a "little-explored" niche. Those who have ventured to take a professional turn with more disruptive and fresh readings regarding the perception of space can attest to other possibilities for conceiving architecture.
While it is true that we have discussed forms of representation through our senses, the role of our reason as an intangible element provides a point of reflection that compels us to look with curious eyes and ask ourselves:
