House Equanimity / Joseph N. Biondo, Architect

Uploaded by — Filed under: Houses ,Selected , , , ,
 

© Steve Wolfe

Architect: Joseph N. Biondo, Architect
Location: Northampton, Pennsylvania,
Budget: US $97 / sq ft
Project Year: 2009
Photographs: Steve Wolfe

Situated in a typical nondescript subdivision of Eastern Pennsylvania, this home is surrounded by other single-family houses of all shapes and sizes, redolent with clichés and conventions which can be just as easily elsewhere as here. For that reason it is the surrounding landscape and history of the region that largely determines the design. The primary building materials, site poured and various products, pay respect to the history of Northampton – the birthplace of American Portland Cement.

Permanently embedded into the landscape of Northampton and now standing proudly in ruin, are the industrial artifacts which record the history of cement making. Kilns which were used to melt the rock quarried here, developed over time. The initial Dome kilns were inefficient and gave way to the Schoefer kilns which could operate continuously. Within a decade, the Schoefer kilns were replaced with rotary kilns whose technology remains in existence. Today’s modern cement plant stands as a strong form consisting of framed boxes perched atop a series of concrete monoliths which loom in the partially monotonous and chaotic surroundings that are suburbia. These industrial machines, along with the material they produce, greatly influence the design of this home.

The house is not a solitary cube that might have been sited anywhere, but one which penetrates into the landscape and becomes one with it. This single-family, three bedroom home deviates in scale and appearance from the neighboring houses. In fact it seems closer in spirit to the forest and topography it nestles within. The main living area, whose face is half buried into the landscape, offers no views to the east except that of its walled courtyard. It is to be a peaceful place, a kind of oasis sheltered from sound and views of the subdivision thus creating an outdoor room that opens to the sky. The interior space is open, intimate, and neutral with domestic objects articulated as furnishings placed within. Hues of blue skin echo the mottled limestone quarried here.

© Steve Wolfe

The base of the home is constructed of concrete. This seemingly unnatural mixture of fluid stone and steel reinforcement is quite sufficiently different from historical materials. However, it is a material that offers the rough, tactile charm that often emanate from the irregularities of mature buildings. Deliberately crude in its execution, the concrete monolith is treated as an existing condition, or ruin, whose subsequent wood-framed, cementitious clad boxes are carefully inserted. The ruin’s powerful presence is derived from its material qualities and from the way it is linked to the ground. It penetrates into the earth and engages a platform which becomes clearly defined as the topography falls away.

© Steve Wolfe

The planted concrete ruin looks as though it is going to be in the location it has found for itself for a long time. Unlike its surrounding production housing counterparts, it is not even thinking of moving away from the place it occupies and defines by its very existence. The concrete is allowed to age, become rough and perhaps slowly erode. The intangible dimension of time could then be recorded by the traces left on the walls. Eventually, gravel will be exposed and particles of dirt, algae, and moss will take hold.

© Steve Wolfe

This home is an architecture that involves all the senses. The surfaces and details demand to be felt. The spaces and special sequences require to be grasped by the senses that apprehend gravity, driving forces, and temperature. Details involving human contact such as entrance areas, steps, handles and hand rails are treated with particular care. The restricted tolerances of construction elegantly contrasts with the random nature of the organic while the massing, textures, and unevenness of weathering surfaces transmit similar sensations to the landscape.

* Location to be used only as a reference. It could indicate city/country but not exact address.
 
 
Thumb up Thumb down 0
ygogolak says:

$97 s.f.? Awesome result

 
# March 25, 2010 at 13:17
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Tony says:

    I work in Pennsylvania and there is no way they built this house at $97./s.f.. It looks like they used Duratherm windows, which are probably the most expensive windows you could use and the kitchen looks like it was 50-75k alone. Unless they didn’t finish the interior in every space not photographed, something’s not right here. Nice house though…

     
    # March 25, 2010 at 14:14
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      lwh says:

      Yup, those are mahogany Duratherm windows! I agree, Im skeptical of their math, or what that number means.

       
      # March 25, 2010 at 20:01
Thumb up Thumb down 0
badfuture says:

maybe 97 per square foot of site. good lord.

if that is actually true, i am blown away

very beautiful project regardless.

 
# March 25, 2010 at 15:24
Thumb up Thumb down 0
marvinsnephew says:

I agree that this is an exquisite design on a beautiful site and it is completely inconceivable that this was built for $97/sf! I work in Northern California where this house would easily cost more than $400/sf to build. It would be helpful if real costs could accompany articles in this and other publications. Clients see the numbers and then don’t have a realistic understanding of what it takes to build a sophisticated custom house.

 
# March 25, 2010 at 15:46
Thumb up Thumb down 0
texas_t says:

nice project but the lift and slides alone in this house were at least 60,000. also a few projects on the architects website not given proper copyright. in other words… not done by him.

 
# March 25, 2010 at 17:47
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Joe says:

    Texas T. All projects on the website are mine with the exception of one -THE LEDGE HOUSE which was done while employed at Bohlin Cywinski Jackson. Peter Bohlin has been an incredible inspiration and mentor to me and our collaboration together will always be cherished.

     
    # March 26, 2010 at 10:33
Thumb up Thumb down 0
William says:

I agree whit badfuture maybe is 97$ per square feet or 900$ per square meters.

 
# March 25, 2010 at 17:50
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Mark says:

Nice project, but unlikely to be built for $97/s.f. unless it was a design-build. Since there was no mention of the client/owner, one could assume that this is the architect’s own residence, making a design-build more likely.

 
# March 25, 2010 at 18:45
Thumb up Thumb down 0
CRISTIAN says:

EXCELENTE!

 
# March 25, 2010 at 22:40
Thumb up Thumb down 0
zack says:

great house, but spare me the architectural b.s. rhetoric.

 
# March 26, 2010 at 09:32
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Joe says:

As architect and general contractor, I need to shed some light on the discussion of cost. The cost per square foot is completely acurate. History shows us when architects have opportunity to be proactive in making buildings, startling results can occur within modest means. The house is a simple box comprised of materials from local building supply centers and straight forward detailing. The only luxury here is the window wall system.

 
# March 26, 2010 at 10:06
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Mark says:

To state that this house was $ 97 sq. ft. does a disservice to both Architects and Contractors.

This patent falsehood gives lay people the impression of what they can expect for their dollars. I can imagine potential clients waving this article about in the belief we can design a home for this tract home budget.

Rift cut cabinetry, lift and slide doors, Large structural cantilevers, Swiss Pearl Panels, Exposed formed in place concrete! Not a chance.

How about publishing the name of the contractor?

BTW, in response to JOE the contractor, ( is this the same as Joe the plumber?) Please come on down to Texas, we have half a dozen clients wanting you to build there homes at this price!

 
# March 26, 2010 at 10:25
Thumb up Thumb down 0
marvinsnephew says:

I assume that Joe IS Joseph Biondo the named architect. I am currently designing and building my own home in Sonoma County California and do not believe what Joe says about costs. I worked closely with all my subs and suppliers and was able to save considerably on materials. That said, however, I was not able to save substantially on labor. Overall, I don’t have final costs, but I am estimating that at best, I will be at $225 – $250/SF. BTW, Joe, did you include the costs of utilities, hook ups and all other elements it takes for the house to function? I find it difficult to believe that building a very custom building anywhere in the US can be done for less than $100/SF.

Joe, please share your secrets!

 
# March 27, 2010 at 14:39
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Joe says:

    Marvinsnephew,
    The design professionals and academics out there who know me, know that I am more than happy to share information in the interest of advancing our built environment(there are no secrets). However, this is not the ideal venue to do so.
    Joe

     
    # March 29, 2010 at 18:27
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Matthew says:

Joe,

Very nice work! I have to admit that I was skeptical of the $97 a foot build cost at first. After closer examination, I can see how it is doable. It would be great if you are willing to confirm some of my assumptions:
-The $97 is build cost not including land.
-The house is approx 4500 square feet, making your total build cost in the neighborhood of $450,000.
-Because you were GC and architect you saved those costs that are typical of an architect/builder/client relationship.
-The concrete portion of the construction eliminates extensive finish/siding costs. My question…is the concrete thermally broken? Looks great but I’m concerned of the energy efficiency.
-What is the heating/cooling system?
-The remaining walls @ the upper floor are wood framed with a simple fiber cement panel siding application.
-Ceilings are stained plywood.
-Although the casework is higher quality, the number of kitchen cabinets and surfaces are kept to a minimum.

The is what great architecture is meant to be. Elegant use of simple honest materials.

Joe…confirm my assumptions?

 
# March 27, 2010 at 15:23
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Joe says:

    Matthew,
    You are spot on! Thank you – finally, someone who studied the building beyond the price tag.
    Joe

     
    # March 29, 2010 at 18:19
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Joseph Felker says:

I saw this in person. An excellent fit to site. I don’t understand all the chatter about the cost. Very basic, down to earth materials were brought together and the final result is spectacular. The windows make the project and they were the only item splurged on.

 
# January 27, 2011 at 09:35
Thumb up Thumb down 0

1:58 PM Mar 25th

ArchDaily: House Equanimity / Joseph N. Biondo, Architect http://bit.ly/b9TbzB

Thumb up Thumb down 0

2:05 PM Mar 25th

Gorgeous! Especially for the budget! RT @archdaily: House Equanimity / Joseph N. Biondo, Architect http://tinyurl.com/y8sy2qp #architecture

Thumb up Thumb down 0

2:15 PM Mar 25th

House Equanimity / Joseph N. Biondo, Architect: © Steve Wolfe
Architect: Joseph N. Biondo, Architect
Location: Nor… http://bit.ly/995D7p

Thumb up Thumb down 0

2:23 PM Mar 25th

RT @designunique: House Equanimity / Joseph N. Biondo, Architect: © Steve Wolfe
Architect: Joseph N. Biondo, Architect
Location: Nor… http://bit.ly/995D7p

Thumb up Thumb down 0

2:34 PM Mar 25th

House Equanimity / Joseph N. Biondo, Architect: © Steve Wolfe
Architect: Joseph N. Biondo, Architect
Location: Nor… http://bit.ly/dqSwpH

Thumb up Thumb down 0

6:00 PM Mar 25th

House Equanimity / Joseph N. Biondo, Architect http://bit.ly/a6Vg0K

Thumb up Thumb down 0

6:08 PM Mar 25th

A love house with nice furniture choices! RT @HomeDecorNews House Equanimity / Joseph N. Biondo, Architect http://bit.ly/a6Vg0K

Thumb up Thumb down 0

10:55 PM Mar 25th

Planned for obsolescence? A house built with what it would look like as a ruin in mind. http://bit.ly/9jYrDw

Thumb up Thumb down 0

11:45 AM Mar 31st

I admit, I had to look up Equanimity http://bit.ly/aPJV6f .

Leave a Reply »

 

Latest Comments »

Looks like it has a ton of potential. A largely walkable city with good...[+]
wow![+]
what a waste of materials…[+]
wonderful projects[+]
Nice! Some more Voronoi-porn[+]

Upcoming Architecture Events »

got events? invite us! click here

Architecture Books & Magazines »

Chase for Space: An Architecture Challenge for the Future / Nejc Trošt

Chase for Space: An Architecture Challenge for the Future / Nejc Trošt

                          Open publication – Free publishing – More book

“Chase for Space: an architecture challenge for the future is an transdisciplinary book with wide overview of future space…

 

Five North American Architects / Kenneth Frampton

Five North American Architects / Kenneth Frampton

Five North American Architects brings together five architectural practices that, while all distinct, share a particular sensibility for the impact of craftsmanship and climate on the generation of form, as well as a concern for the expressive tactility of material…

 

PUBLIC / C.F. Møller Architects

PUBLIC / C.F. Møller Architects

In this book, C. F. Møller Architects, one of Scandinavia’s most renowned practices, founded in 1924, presents a wide range of their award-winning public design. It includes hospitals, universities and schools, public administration, masterplans, and housing, all conceived with a…

 

Our partners »

AD on iPad via Pulse

Browse by date »

Browse by category »

Friends »