Los Angeles NFL Stadium / Aedas Sport

By — Filed under: Sports Architecture , , ,
 

Designed by Aedas Sport, the innovative 75,000-seat stadium will be the first LEED-certified building in the NFL and will capture the luxury and drama of the world’s entertainment capital. The project anticipates completion for the 2013 season. Both the NFL and the client, Majestic Realty, are committed to making a progressive statement with this building and are exploring a number of initiatives that will make this the most environmentally progressive stadium in the U.S. has employed the unique topography of the site to build the stadium into a hillside, reducing the steel structure by 40% and allowing at least two-thirds of the seating bowl to be built on grade.

More images and full architect’s description after the break.

A significant coup for the architect, developer and owner, this strategy resulted in an US$800m design — US$400m-$500m less than any other recent NFL stadium proposal. An asymmetrical configuration allows all of the suites and VIP areas to be loaded on the west side of the stadium and integrated into the adjacent retail promenade. While primarily for the NFL, this 365 day-a-year entertainment destination can also accommodate soccer, college and high school football, and large concerts. The stadium powers a retail and entertainment destination, offering flexibility with large, interchangeable sponsorship zones for various audiences. Slated to become the NFL’s first LEED compliant stadium, Aedas’ design includes reduced CO2 emissions, recycling initiatives, and — due to the great reduction of steel in the structure — a significant decrease in hazardous environmental effects associated with material manufacturing and transportation.

 
 
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Felix says:

Somehow the renders remind me of the movie “Speed Racer” The actual quality of the architecture is kinda hard to judge

 
# February 1, 2010 at 11:36
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Lil Jimmy says:

This embodies all I hate about LA…wtf is this garbage? No substance. Why can’t Americans design a cool modern stadium?

 
# February 1, 2010 at 11:40
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    INawe says:

    Define “cool modern stadium”.

    Which Starchitect would you have design a stadium for you because a cool looking stadium is all that matters right????

     
    # February 1, 2010 at 13:49
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      Lil Jimmy says:

      No, having a “Starchitect” design this would fall right under all I hate about LA….
      How about taking a look at European soccer stadiums…now those are much more interesting than any stadium built in the US.

       
      # February 3, 2010 at 12:10
Thumb up Thumb down 0

A visual assault. A great idea that looks like it has been co-opted by corporate sponsorship of every last square inch. It almost looks as if they are building it in a fashion that would let them easily convert it into a mall/concert venue if the whole L.A. football thing doesn’t pan out.

 
# February 1, 2010 at 11:46
Thumb up Thumb down 0
CMO ARCH says:

Could these renderings be any busier, Jesus! I feel like I’m gonna get robbed just by looking at these images, I can’t imagine actually going there…

 
# February 1, 2010 at 11:58
Thumb up Thumb down 0
RJ says:

That’s the stuff we’ve been waiting for. LEED! LEED! LEED!

But seriously, couldn’t the architects squeeze a bit more branding into this mega sports consu-tainment experience? And what is with all of this dreary lighting? Can’t someone take a stand and build another dam on the Colorado to power this baby appropriately?

 
# February 1, 2010 at 12:00
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Mike says:

Way too much going on in those renderings. Maybe trying too hard to distract from the fact that they do not have an NFL team to occupy that space currently.

 
# February 1, 2010 at 12:01
Thumb up Thumb down 0
paul says:

good enough fot that “sport”

 
# February 1, 2010 at 12:40
Thumb up Thumb down 0
ryan says:

haha, i can’t believe anyone is complaining about the corporate logos, if anything, i think that is an honest and realistic aspect of the project. Whether or not it got put in renderings, it would happen in real life.

however some of the images get a bit busy.

 
# February 1, 2010 at 12:45
Thumb up Thumb down 0
isla says:

is it possible? can anybody put some corporate logos in the renders?, btw this is the ugliest stadium project i`ve seen in my live!, a perfect example of koolhaas garbage space!, sorry mi english…

 
# February 1, 2010 at 12:59
Thumb up Thumb down 0
chas says:

the stadium may be green but it’s only part of a much larger complex. With all the lightings, glass and theatrics of the larger complex I don’t see how it could possibly be be green. I’m left to conclude that greening the stadium is nothing more than a smoke screen to hide the larger ill. I guess it’s better than nothing and lets face it, there’s going to be a stadium there regardless so might as well do something.
what the heck do they mean by “Interchangable sponsorship zones”? That’s sounds to me like a fancy name for every shopping center in the world. Stores of shopping centers are always changing so their all “interchangable”.

 
# February 1, 2010 at 13:00
Thumb up Thumb down 0
INawe says:

I don’t care just as long as LA finally gets a football team! All I can say is that this is way better than the fugly billion dollar stadium that is home to the Dallas Cowboys.

If that’s what it takes to build the stadium i’ll take it. Sure with its LEED and all that stuff is a bonus but the true driving factor in the form of this stadium is overall cost and they know it. That’s the sole reason why a stadium hasn’t been built sooner in one of the biggest cities and markets in the US (all the other proposals were way too expensive).

 
# February 1, 2010 at 13:45
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Juni says:

Disney World

 
# February 1, 2010 at 13:46
Thumb up Thumb down 0
mnjoe says:

Stay away from the Vikings, Los Angeles.

The purple seats are not a good sign.

 
# February 1, 2010 at 14:37
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Nicolas says:

those renders are too much for my taste.. about the design, it doesnt look that bad, i like the roofs but u get “overwhlemed” (in a bad way) by those renders and its not a good impression.

 
# February 1, 2010 at 14:45
Thumb up Thumb down 0
peter says:

terrible, just terrible

 
# February 1, 2010 at 15:27
Thumb up Thumb down 0
GBLK says:

Yes, the renderings are too much .. but if you see the model its more simple. I like the design, for its “statement”(maybe its all just screen because its less expensive , but isnt that good?) and maybe this will make more people design stadiums this way “GREEN”.

The lights maybe too much , but light tecnology like LED’s right now are energy efficient and i think it wont be turned on 24/7. I think we have to get used to see more buildings like this cuz its just the way architechture is going.More enviromentaly aware,sure people have monetery interest, its just how the world goes..

P.D: Sorry for my english, trying to better myself!.

 
# February 1, 2010 at 15:35
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    GBLK says:

    *cause…sorry for that..

     
    # February 1, 2010 at 15:37
Thumb up Thumb down 0

There’s nothing ‘GREEN’ about all that green, Los Angeles is meant to be arid and brown. Green because lack of steel? Please. More congestion on the highways to get to this thing, more crap being sold en mass to dunk sports fans, more garish spotlights. This is green washing at it’s most blatant.

 
# February 1, 2010 at 15:50
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Rodrigo says:

The first few renders are a joke, look like they were made by 12-year-olds… WTH with the firecrackrers?? I don’t want to meet the people who did this

 
# February 1, 2010 at 16:08
Thumb up Thumb down 0
mike says:

I guess the renders were not made for other architects to judge, but for the people who give the money, so all that mattered was making them look colorful and flashy, just like advertisement does… I agree, they are too busy and distract from the actual architecutre, nevertheless I see the skills that are required to put out renderings like those.

I am not familiar with stadium architecture, so I can’t really compare, but I like the design quite a lot (as already mentioned..the modell picture shows the actual simplicity quite well), I think making it look like a hill forming out of the landscpae does the size of the project justice, because imho huge buildings look kinda out of place quite easily when just put down in the area.

 
# February 1, 2010 at 17:27
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Rembo says:

Aedas, what are you trying to gain posting on this blog? I seriously wonder.

 
# February 1, 2010 at 17:41
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Dustin says:

basically its the same concept as the new chivas stadium in Guadalajara only with huge advertisment posted all over its arse.
http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/1716/chivasstadiumcu7.jpg

 
# February 1, 2010 at 22:21
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    jv says:

    While I would agree with you aesthetically speaking; if you compare the sections of those two stadiums, the new chivas stadium appears to be fully structuring their hill (so that its basically a sloped grass roof), while LA is using the hill to structure the seating and save money on steel (like the Rose Bowl / Dodgers Stadium / the LA Coliseum.

     
    # February 2, 2010 at 17:14
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Carlos says:

Ridiculous, shows the bad state that “modern” architecture is in. this embodies everything that’s wrong with architecture and the “leed” process (which is BS btw).

 
# February 2, 2010 at 03:32
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    GBLK says:

    Hey why do you say te Leed process is Bs??what are you basing on? cause ive been very skeptic about it.. so if you could help me out here..

     
    # February 2, 2010 at 12:38
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Ernesto says:

If your one of those people who believed in the LEED process your a joke. Its only done to legitimize bad and un-responsible architecture.

 
# February 2, 2010 at 03:39
Thumb up Thumb down 0
John Speed says:

Very misLEEDing indeed! Aedas pulls off the impossible and gives us another horrendous looking design.

 
# February 2, 2010 at 04:05
Thumb up Thumb down 0
amr says:

Whinge, whinge, whinge….don’t you understand sport does not function without sponsorship. I do not watch NFL as it is boring to me down here in Oz but put yourself in the architects’ shoes.
The client, the brief, the budget, the stakeholders and the sponsors. It is not easy but architecture is about solving problems.
Perhaps one day all of you that are whinging because you spend your days documenting toilets might actually get the opportunity to put your ‘design skills’ where your mouth is.

 
# February 2, 2010 at 05:58
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Rembo says:

    I got mad design skills in my mouth, and they be all like – Before you start pontificating about sponsors and stakeholders, think about all of the great stadiums (current and past) that accomplish an amazing quality of design without succumbing to the low standards of Aedas’ proposal. Blam!

     
    # February 3, 2010 at 08:31
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Rodrigo says:

Welcome to bahia

 
# February 2, 2010 at 07:04
Thumb up Thumb down 0
bilo says:

Purple and Gold!!!

We started by stealing the Lakers from MN…Now we’ll steal the Vikings…

 
# February 2, 2010 at 14:06
Thumb up Thumb down 0
nancy says:

could it be more grotesque? l.a., hasn’t cornered the market on sorry artchitecture, but this could help it move in that direction.

 
# February 2, 2010 at 15:18
Thumb up Thumb down 0

A little harsh there folks. It’s large scale architecture with heavy concern for the environment. “The first LEED-certified building in the NFL”. I think it’s probably one of the biggest LEED certified buildings to date. LEED stands for: The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. It encourages and accelerates global adoption of sustainable green building and development practices. We need this, because of the state of the world we currently live in. I think I can live with obnoxious colors, so long as I know it’s good for the environment.

 
# February 2, 2010 at 15:27
Thumb up Thumb down 0
jv says:

I think what could be a very novel approach to the challenges of designing a modern NFL stadium is being completely obscured by the fact that an advertising agency appears to have taken a nice juicy dump on most of the renderings.
Therein lies the challenge, I suppose.

 
# February 2, 2010 at 17:24
Thumb up Thumb down 0
CRISTIAN says:

ITS A GOOD PROJECT BUT VERY BAD REPRESENTATED I GET A LITTLE BIT DIZZY WHEN I LOOK AT THE IMAGES ….. BUT THERE IS ONE SKECHT THAT I THINK SHOULD BE THE FINAL OUTCOME OF THIS( THE PURPLE ONE). STILL LETS NOT JUDGE THIS BECOUSE IS NOT LIKE THE NEW CAMP NOU OR THE “COOL MODERN STADIUMS ” IT IS AN AUTHENTIC WORK AND JUST BECOUSE OF THAT IT IS SMT OF WORTH
SALUDOS!

 
# February 3, 2010 at 13:51
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Chip says:

A perfect venue for all the overweight Americans to watch “the big game”!!!

 
# February 3, 2010 at 15:34
Thumb up Thumb down 0

I Like: Los Angeles NFL Stadium. http://bit.ly/97pxLj

 
# February 3, 2010 at 22:01
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Osiolek says:

Yeah. One billion people, lights, billboards, cars, trees, fireworks, airship, big logo … and there is no place for stadium. I understand sponsorship but even if this pictures for any company – would you like to see at least 5 others big company logos on one rendering ?

Maybe its a “simple idea” stadium like this in Guadalajara , not to aggressive , a little bit hidden – but i can only see bazaar – minimum architecture , maximum commerce.

Is there any kind a roof over field , or will by ?

 
# February 4, 2010 at 06:47
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Le Vine says:

Anyone know where in the LA area this is supposed to be located?

 
# February 4, 2010 at 15:06
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Snarkitect says:

    Off the 215 I heard…

     
    # February 9, 2010 at 21:48
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Elizah Leigh says:

Los Angeles could be the home of the world’s first LEED certified football stadium as soon as 2011 http://is.gd/7OGMZ

 
# February 6, 2010 at 10:53
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Carlos says:

cant believe that people still defend this building because its LEED, obviously you have not worked of a substantial LEED project. Thats the reason i decided to leave a very good job in a bad economic climate, because architecture as a system is dysfunctional and broken. As i said before LEED is only a way to legitimize BAD DESIGN (besides the fact that its a ridiculously expensive process filed with paper work). I will never Do Architecture again for personal economic profit.

 
# February 15, 2010 at 01:39
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Eric says:

this stadium, if built, would be a crime to humanity

 
# February 17, 2010 at 10:51
Thumb up Thumb down 0
al ray says:

…too bad they don’t have a nfl team in l.a……

 
# June 29, 2010 at 00:11
Thumb up Thumb down 0

10:20 AM Feb 2nd

Thumb up Thumb down 0

11:38 AM Feb 2nd

Los Angeles NFL Stadium / Aedas Sport | ArchDaily http://bit.ly/adDL1c

Thumb up Thumb down 0

11:39 AM Feb 2nd

RT @archdaily: Los Angeles NFL Stadium / Aedas Sport http://bit.ly/biSG0F

Thumb up Thumb down 0

4:04 PM Feb 2nd

Los Angeles NFL Stadium / Aedas Sport http://bit.ly/dn3xq7 #football #losangeles

Thumb up Thumb down 0

10:03 PM Feb 3rd

Pretty sweet. RT @nicholaspatten I Like: Los Angeles NFL Stadium. http://bit.ly/97pxLj

Thumb up Thumb down 0

5:28 AM Feb 15th

Not sure why exactly, but these Aedas renderings for LA's stadium look like they belong in The Onion: http://bit.ly/9dSLub

Thumb up Thumb down 0

5:35 AM Feb 15th

RT @markasaurus: Not sure why exactly, but these Aedas renderings for LA's stadium look like they belong in The Onion: http://bit.ly/9dSLub

Thumb up Thumb down 0

10:21 AM May 22nd

I love the proposed Los Angeles NFL stadium. 1st stadium to be LEED certified: http://bit.ly/a9DTya

Thumb up Thumb down 0

12:49 PM Aug 18th

Thanks – Love knowing #LA #NFL is going mainstream! RT @archdaily: @AedasSport #Entourage reminded me of this: http://archdai.ly/aZjHuQ

Leave a Reply »

 

Latest Comments »

reading again the same ol’ simplifications is not funny. reading a...[+]
aaaaaaaaaaaaand I’m done.[+]
Now GO decorate some wall.[+]
The best chance of making the UK a...[+]
Architects have no use for cutesy, valueless generalizations about their...[+]

Upcoming Architecture Events »

got events? invite us! click here

Architecture Books & Magazines »

Volume 27: Aging

Volume 27: Aging

I never can get enough of Volume. This issue is loaded with provocative articles that stimulate discussion about a pressing reality, the dramatic demographic shift in the age of human populations. Throughout this issue there are articles like Martti…

 

Louis Kahn Drawing to Find Out / Michael Merrill

Louis Kahn Drawing to Find Out / Michael Merrill

We recently featured the companion to this book, Louis Kahn On the Thoughtful Making of Spaces. This large format book draws together over two hundred—mostly unpublished—drawings of Kahn’s Dominican Motherhouse. It offers a fascinating look into Kahn’s design process…

 

The Architecture of Croce, Aflalo and Gasperini / Aflalo and Gasperini Architects

The Architecture of Croce, Aflalo and Gasperini / Aflalo and Gasperini Architects

Aflalo & Gasperini Arquitetos recently shared with us the book they are launching titled, “The Architecture of Croce, Aflalo and Gasperini.” The book details the 50 years history of one of the most important architecture office in Brazil. The…

 

Our partners »

AD on iPad via Pulse

Browse by date »

Browse by category »

Friends »