Aveleda’s House / Manuel Ribeiro

Uploaded by — Filed under: Houses ,Selected , ,
 

© Ivo Tavares

Architect: Manuel Ribeiro
Location: Braga,
Project Team:
Structural Engineer: Alberto Fernandes Ribeiro
Landscape Architect: Manuel Ribeiro, Architect
Contractor: William Kent Development Inc.
Project Area: 450m sqm
Project Year: 2006-2007
Photographs: Ivo Tavares

Designed in Braga, Aveleda´s House is a villa designed to accommodate the light as a source of inner experience of housing.

© Ivo Tavares

The basic idea of the project, parts from the concept of being located near by the old Roman city of “Bracara Augustae”, where the ancient Roman houses, the Domus, were built around an internal square. Hence all the subtlety of the house is achieved with a careful distribution. In other hand, it was searchable to provide all 6 senses of life.

“… We tried to take the most of the land to create a connection with the interior of the building, leaving a view of the valley and the square that exists between the two bodies housing …”, highlights Manuel Ribeiro, architect and author of the project responsible for its implementation.

ground floor plan

The main body which houses the social functions of the house is situated at the same elevation of the square, assuming the sloping ground with the Hall higher, comparatively to the social part and creating a view of all from this; the social area involves open spaces, living and dining room without doors to the kitchen, and bathroom service is disguised within.

Down below the architect created a space for a gym and an office, supplied by the natural slope of the terrain.

section 02

The private area with 4 bedrooms (1 suite and 3 rooms) and a large bathroom facility support is at the elevation of the entrance hall, raised highly in comparison of the external square, without losing the visual field.

The suite room as also a closet, and a large bathroom, where’s a division between the uses (bath, sanitary and sinks).

© Ivo Tavares

On the square that is outside, we can find the pool that reminds us the Roman “compluvium” of a “Domus”, centered on between two areas of housing. Uniting all construction towards the valley and enhanced with the Sun´s circuit along with the glass façade.

The engine room, the locker room and a support kitchen area in a under elevation of the square, as a support for the outdoor activities.

© Ivo Tavares

“… The plasticity of the object HOUSE (purpose built) will always be overridden by the phenomenological aspect, giving identity and character to the building and so, it’s able now to provide a center of life, functional and familiar at the same time that explores the pleasure of landscapes, spacious zones and materials.

This will not be only a “home”, but always a Domus. All the project intends to explore the human being as well as it senses: touch, sight, smell, hearing, taste and passion. These are aspects that never been neglected. On the contrary, they are always present… ”, he concludes.

 
 
Thumb up Thumb down 0
tsktsk says:

Chapa 5!
Must all portuguese architecture posted here come from the same template?

 
# January 20, 2010 at 04:26
    Thumb up Thumb down 0

    it is inspired on a roman domus! there´s a comum language in between this house and mediterranean architecture; its not a template: its a cultural heritage!

    at least we have one that goes around the world.

     
    # January 20, 2010 at 10:24
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      luso says:

      by one you are refering to?

       
      # January 20, 2010 at 17:35
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      Carlos says:

      You gotta be kidding, right?
      Your speech is even worse than your architecture!

       
      # January 21, 2010 at 12:59
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Tiago Dias says:

    Jeeezus…

    I have been thinking the same for the past few months, I cannot remember the last time that I came across Portuguese arquitecture on this website that is not instantly recognizable as Portuguese…

    Not because it is great, but because it is square.

    Came on guys, retire those rulers…it is all looking a little too “Geriatric” now.

     
    # January 20, 2010 at 12:24
Thumb up Thumb down 0
xirclebox says:

i like this house –> Aveleda’s House / Manuel Ribeiro http://bit.ly/4QUqNK (via feedly)

 
# January 20, 2010 at 09:19
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Pedro says:

Tiago Dias, tens toda a razão..

Tiago Dias is right about what he said.
Portuguese architecture is much more diverse than this. There are so many offices that are risking in order to stay out of that “safe” way of making projects, that don´t bring nothing new to the conceptual world of architecture.

I like Arch Daily very much, but I think that they could search for more quality works from Portugal,
like João Mendes Ribeiro, Atelier do Corvo, Manuel Graça Dias+Egas Vieira, João Carrilho da Graça, Inês Lobo,…

 
# January 20, 2010 at 14:18
Thumb up Thumb down 0

I'd Live Here: Aveleda’s House. http://bit.ly/79TiYk

 
# January 21, 2010 at 01:47
Thumb up Thumb down 0
WPstudios says:

RT @nicholaspatten I'd Live Here: Aveleda?s House. http://bit.ly/79TiYk

 
# January 21, 2010 at 01:48
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Margarida says:

All judgements and discussions concerning the architecture aside, please find a better translator for the article. Some people read the text as well… Shame to miss all the thinking behind the project!

 
# January 21, 2010 at 04:36
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Tiago Dias says:

    I have to admit that I wrote my first post as a knee jerk reaction to a felling that has been bugging me for a while regarding my personal opinion about the “squareness” of current Portuguese Architecture repeatedly displayed on this site.

    Therefore I proceeded in shame to read the text as suggested by Margarida.

    Well, I have to say that I was not anymore impressed than I was before.

    I will not enumerate the reasons why I actually like it less after reading it than before, as my original comment was not so much about the particular but the general, and I wish nothing but success for the parties involved.

    However…in retrospect…I feel that I should not have to “Read” Architecture, but Admire, Feel and ultimately Live it…

    …as the latter is usually not an option, the first two will have to make do and sometimes compensate.

    “Reading” Architecture is for Academics of Architecture only, I am a Designer and I also appreciate the value of a good idea and a process of thought that engages me, but not if that is actually more interesting than the images of it.

    Is there no room for improvement, evolution or progression on this theme?

    Am I stuck to seeing more orthogonal delight for years to come?!

    I thought it was cool at Expo 98…but it was 1998 and I was only 20…

     
    # January 21, 2010 at 15:46
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Maurice Nioxxx says:

90 % of portuguese architecture : Bauhaus 1940 !

And the question is why ?

 
# January 21, 2010 at 05:43
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Rick says:

    There was no Bauhaus in 1940. Did you study?

     
    # January 21, 2010 at 19:17
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Dean Straughan says:

The program works fine. The concept is clear. However, most of the internal spaces seem so sterile.

Where’s the delight?

 
# January 21, 2010 at 09:16
Thumb up Thumb down 0
luso says:

I get the impression that Portuguese architects aspire to be like Siza and Souto Moura or that they are taught to design in those styles at architecture school.

 
# January 21, 2010 at 10:03
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Carlos says:

    Well it’s both actually!

     
    # January 21, 2010 at 12:55
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      luso says:

      Why is that? isn’t there any incentive to be more creative and daring? or is that what the tutors ask for?

       
      # January 21, 2010 at 16:03
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      Carlos says:

      Once again… both!

       
      # January 22, 2010 at 04:41
Thumb up Thumb down 0
abe says:

Archdaily, portuguese works are better than this. This is a clean, but boring and sad architecture.

 
# January 21, 2010 at 10:28
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Manuel says:

consequetly, I been seeing “square” architecture all around the world, not just Portugal. sad is the eye that cannot see.
Anyway thanx for the discussion, because as I´ve seen all of the participants love to show off, well, let´s see next years, how it´s going to be.

 
# January 21, 2010 at 15:43
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Pedro says:

“well, let´s see next years, how it´s going to be”

Manuel, I can see you are struggling to make a difference here, but… what are you really saying?!
Next years, you´ll win the Pritzker with these “roman domus- inspired” houses?

Of course, we we´ll always have “square” architecture all around the world, but we evolved so much since the 80s and 90s that we can make a difference in our new buildings.

Just saying..

 
# January 21, 2010 at 16:15
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Rick S. says:

That’s it, I’m tired of these threads. For the sake of discussion, I’d like to point out that it’s pretty sad that the dislike of a particular project drags with it the underrating of a so-claimed formal approach of a country’s common practice, and it’s always Portugal. Moreover, I see that these kind of comments come from portuguese people! Why so resented with your fellow countrymen? It appears to be a great debate among architects in Portugal about national(istic) identity, as if there were people who don’t want to see themselves related to a certain way of doing things just because they are also Portuguese, and that is just plain stupid. Take out the captions, and nobody could tell where the house really is. What you’re whining about as a certain “Portuguese architecture” is the architecture of the white matchbox, and it’s the same in Spain, Mexico, Greece, The Phillipines or Los Angeles. Trying to call it just for yourselves, makes you look silly, honestly. It’s an era of subjectivity, you just have to be coherent, to be yourselves and mind less being in the pack. Look at Dean Straughan’s comment, and you’ll see what’s really important here, on this house, on Archdaily and anywhere in the world.

And the “Portuguese architects aspire to be like Siza and Souto Moura” argument, always present in any article about ANY white building in Portugal, is ridiculous and tiresome already, and surprinsingly it usually comes from a Portuguese… They’re good architects, they’re well known for that, and is obvious that they must be influential in Portugal, but these kind of remarks makes me think of a community of people resented of other colleague’s success, unable or unwilling to understand the quality of what they’re criticizing. That’s a pity, for it’s clear that there are good practices around Portugal, everybody knows that, yet you guys seem to still feel that the nationalistic tag is necessary, and that it carries a formal luggage with it. It doesn’t, not anymore.

 
# January 21, 2010 at 21:30
Thumb up Thumb down 0
luso says:

Im not sure if the question is the quality of the project of which i personally think is of a good standard especially compared to lots of the crap that i see here in the uk. What worries me is that a lot of portuguese architects appear to be afraid of stepping outside the typical white matchbox architecture and taking on a design language that looks more towards the future and is almost dramatic not that this is neccessarily the correct path to follow mind you. Modern crazy vanguard architecture is be no means perfect architecture. However we must not fall behind those who are involved in the world of car design for example.

 
# January 21, 2010 at 22:35
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Tiago Dias says:

    I’m actually involved in the world of Car Designer.
    Thanks for the “compliment”!

     
    # January 22, 2010 at 15:20
Thumb up Thumb down 0
tsktsk says:

Esta casa está para a actualidade tal como os moveis da Capital do Móvel estão para o “moderno”, pareçe que é mas não é!

 
# January 22, 2010 at 04:54
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Estêvão Ferreira says:

What is wrong with “squareness” Architecture? I dont know anything about Architecture but i know what i like, and i like “squareness”! If i want “roundeness” ill by a VW bettle! Do you Architects also have fashion and out of fashion Architecture?

 
# January 22, 2010 at 15:19
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Tiago Dias says:

    Like it was rightly so implied in one of the previous posts, this “Comment Section” is descending into a Forum of discussion about the merits or absence of regarding a particular trend. I feel partly responsible for that, and I guess, this is not the place for that.

    Therefore I shall change the tone a little, and focus more on the particular rather than the general…

    Some people might like it this project very much, others less, I myself, clearly subscribe to the latter.

    As an observer, I feel this project is unemotional and surely void of the passion claimed. Blank walls, basement looking windows on living rooms, office like kitchen, sterile hotel bathrooms all add to the vast volumes of white on the orthographic volumes of the exterior.
    On some pictures you would be forgiven for wondering whether it is really a Home or if it is in fact an office or a school.

    As a Designer, I feel this project is not Modern or even progressive (neither to the Art of Architecture nor to the “(Portuguese) Matchbox Movement” previously mentioned).

    And if it it fails to be any of the good things you expect from a home, a fitting representative of good Portuguese architecture or progressive in any way shape or form?

    Then what is it?

    A 450sq/m anonymous array of white blocks anally placed around a Pool??

    I’ll just go back to bed, thank you very much!

    Fine…as house on a street somewhere, with no aspirations of being more than a house.
    Fine.

    But as a representative of Portuguese architecture?!
    Errrrrrrr…NOT OK

    The Mission statement of this particular site is to provide…

    “…the best architecture around the world, as soon as possible.”
    http://www.archdaily.com/about/

    This is what I expect from ArchDaily when I log in, and in this case I felt it failed me…

    But enough ranting…If anyone likes it, please pull your finger out and educate the Plebe as to why this project can claim to…

    “…explore the human being as well as it senses: touch, sight, smell, hearing, taste and passion. These are aspects that never been neglected. On the contrary, they are always present…”
    As quoted from the text accompanying the victim.

    and

    Why it deserves the accolade of being posted as one of the day’s “best architecture around the world”.

    Because, I am at a loss on that.

    By the way, and finally, any thoughts about the glorious Blue Bathroom. Other than…”Why on earth did he post that???” or “Is that really an aluminium door?”

     
    # January 22, 2010 at 18:20
Thumb up Thumb down 0
gotcha says:

seriously… it’s getting ridiculous… every time a white portuguese house comes out there’s always 2 or 3 people that have to bring out the siza\souto moura issue…and just like rick said.. 90% of the time, those people are portuguese… undermining their fellow countrymen’s work.. why can’t you be glad for your colegues and for their accomplishments? come on.. you’r better than this, we’re better than this.. enough. if you want to criticise… criticise the actual house… not the architectural culture.. wich is not the reflection of a few works… as you know better than anyone else..

to me it’s a quite peaceful and confortable space… ideal to live with your family..well thought and well built…

i must say.. my teacher admires portuguese architects.. he say’s that they are able to design as great works as the best architects and yet with less ressources… and from what i’v seen i have to agree.

 
# January 22, 2010 at 18:39
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Estêvão Ferreira says:

Problem with Portuguese is jealousy! I belive we prefer to point out what our countrymen did wrong instead of glamourise their achievements. I must agree with gotcha, and i quote: “it’s quite peaceful and confortable space… ideal to live with your family”. What can be wrong with that???

 
# January 24, 2010 at 10:23
Thumb up Thumb down 0
carlos ferreira says:

I’m a Portuguese designer, and I happen to think this is a nicely resolved design. I would be proud to have designed it and would gladly live in it.

 
# January 24, 2010 at 18:14
Thumb up Thumb down 0

It’s impressive. Come on. Who wouldn’t want to live in this amazing home. Besides, isn’t causing controversy and bringing out such strong complements and criticism a form of flattery? I think that anything that is worthwhile, will probably be criticized by somebody.

 
# January 25, 2010 at 04:16
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Tiago Dias says:

    “I think that anything that is worthwhile, will probably be criticized by somebody.”

    Very nice…But perhaps only as deep as the subject itself.

    since…

    Regardless of how mediocre, there will always be someone who loves it!

    True?

     
    # January 25, 2010 at 16:50
Thumb up Thumb down 0
João says:

” tsktsk says:

Esta casa está para a actualidade tal como os moveis da Capital do Móvel estão para o “moderno”, pareçe que é mas não é!”

Sinceramente é um bocado isto, mas a estrutura da casa(planta, disposição) é muito boa, o que lixa tudo são alguns acabamentos (revestimentos, pavimentos, a caixilharia da sala e cozinha, iluminação, wc’s) mas com uns toques podia ficar bastante boa

 
# February 7, 2010 at 13:23
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Halima Mohamed says:

I like How the architect play with the levels and have a connection between the ground floor and first floor. The architect have great concept that related to the region that surround the building.

 
# October 10, 2011 at 08:43
Thumb up Thumb down 0

12:32 PM Jan 20th

#arch #house #light Projeto Residencial de Manuel Ribeiro – Braga, Portugal http://bit.ly/5NCBYv

Thumb up Thumb down 0

12:45 PM Jan 20th

Esse projeto é uma das muitas referência que eu vou usar na hora de fazer minha casa. http://tinyurl.com/ylyssql #NotThatAnyoneCares

Thumb up Thumb down 0

12:46 PM Jan 20th

Aveleda’s House by Portuguese Architect Manuel Ribeiro http://bit.ly/5NCBYv (via @fabiolajb)

Thumb up Thumb down 0

12:58 PM Jan 20th

Interessante projeto residencial portugues RT @archdaily Aveleda’s House / Manuel Ribeiro http://bit.ly/4AeG81

Thumb up Thumb down 0

3:37 PM Jan 20th

Aveleda’s House, http://bit.ly/7Oo96C

Thumb up Thumb down 0

11:38 AM Jan 21st

This house is awesome yo http://bit.ly/7qEVGU

Leave a Reply »

 

Latest Comments »

I’m sure this post made sense in your head.[+]
Looks like an upscale version of a Coop...[+]
Jen Camp on TuboHotel / T3arc
It’s not hot and muggy! it’s at an altitude of about 8,000 feet. It’s a very...[+]
like this one most :D[+]
Facebook Funny Pictures on The C114 House / Postarch
It is the best time to make a few plans for the future and it’s...[+]

Upcoming Architecture Events »

got events? invite us! click here

Architecture Books & Magazines »

Golconde: The Introduction of Modernism in India

Golconde: The Introduction of Modernism in India

Sited on the coastal edge of the Bay of Bengal, Golconde, a dormitory for the Sri Aurobindo Ashram in Pondicherry, India, was designed by architects Antonin Raymond and George Nakashima. Golconde is a remarkable architectural edifice, seemlessly negotiating between

 

This is Hybrid / a+t research group

This is Hybrid / a+t research group

Following years of research, a+t publishers presents the first theoretical-practical book on hybrid buildings. Taking its inspiration from the four issues of a+t magazine’s Hybrid series, the book takes a look at the theories and projects which have had…

 

Architectural Modelmaking

Architectural Modelmaking

“The representation of creative ideas is of primary importance within any design-based discipline, and is particularly relevant in architecture where we often do not get to see the finished results, i.e. the building, until the very end of the…

 

Our partners »

AD on iPad via Pulse

Browse by date »

Browse by category »

Friends »