Become a fan of ArchDaily on Facebook!

Eden Falls / Visiondivision

By Karen Cilento — Filed under: Competitions , News , , , ,
 

5_visiondivision_eden_falls_perspective_72dpi

Visiondivision shared their Eden Falls entry for a vertical zoo competition organized by Arquitectum with us.  The design features a thunderous water curtain facade that offers a dramatic entry condition as visitors pass over a moat of crocodiles and into a free setting where monkeys and birds freely roam about the building, and a  pool with fresh water dolphins rests on the roof.

More images and more about the zoo after the break.

6_visiondivision_eden_falls_foyer_72dpi

The water curtain is formed as a result of the building taking water from the river, cleaning it and then pumping it through a system of huge pipes (which form the building’s structural system).  The constant overflow on the roof causes the water to flow off the sides, enveloping the entire structure in a dynamic waterfall.  The rush of water conceals the pipe structure and as the falling water hits the surface, it is turned into energy via turbines and a generator.  The structure is completely self-sufficient and can provide for water and energy for other future structures in the reserve or existing ones in Puerto Madero.  It also becomes a unique and striking symbol for the Costanera Sur and the river.

4_visiondivision_eden_falls_diagram_72dpi

A core of circulation rests in the middle of the building and several cantilevered footbridges breach the waterfall so one can enjoy the views of the Costanera Sur, the city and the river.

drawings

The floors for the animals are divided into flats for each species, with a balcony that pierces the waterfall and a typology of plants and vegetation that is suitable for that animal.

7_visiondivision_eden_falls_roof_pool_72dpi

drawings

1_visiondivision_eden_falls_lion_72dpi

 

46 comments »

Dustin says:

I wonder how much water would end up wasted because of this, it sounds and looks really good, but the amount of water being pumped, the cleaning process and the amount of water loss because of wind, animal and human pollution etc.. hardly seems sustainable to me. Maybe I am wrong, thats just my point of view from the information presented.
Also, would’nt that be really unsafe? the renders show the water in a free fall from a very high altitude.. that would be very deadly.
Great idea though, I have’nt seen the rest of the projects but this one has to earn points for creativity.

 
# November 30, 2009 at 20:22
Dustin says:

haha by the way… those are some bad arse animals.. they are like twice the size of the humans in the last render.

 
# November 30, 2009 at 20:23
rupertKensington says:

looks like more photoshop work than architectural design. i like the idea but poorly presented, so many problems…..

 
# November 30, 2009 at 20:27
Architist says:

Architecturally is impressive. But why don’t we find sollutions to build something in the natural environment whereby the animals and human can coexist together as one, instead taking them from their natural states and force them into a robotic structure???? Plus to much water is being wasting in this architecture eventhough it will taking from the river.

 
# November 30, 2009 at 21:24
eunice says:

i don’t understand… what about the people inside? what panorama can they see from inside the building?

 
# November 30, 2009 at 21:56
dyllbot says:

What an outrageous design!

I love seening this sort of thing, it makes me smile.

 
# November 30, 2009 at 21:57
    Gustav Z says:

    I agree totaly. Visiondivisions designs are always uplifting and many times more possible to realize then it seems at first glanze.

    Lovely

     
    # December 1, 2009 at 02:13
jeff says:

Why bother to shelter the animals? Hazardous structure. You may see a basejumping giraffe. hahaha

 
# November 30, 2009 at 22:06
james says:

people seem to be taking this all too seriously.
it’s speculative. Its about an idea.
The images are quite mesmerizing.

 
# November 30, 2009 at 23:18
LiN says:

interesting idea, but not real ^^

 
# December 1, 2009 at 00:36
architecture student says:

don’t trash this design…..it is an idea. radical ideas are not always build-able, but they do challenge conventions….and are often interesting….try having some imagination

 
# December 1, 2009 at 01:18
shreyank says:

people shud stop watching sci-fi movies… outrageous.

it was fine till cleaning the water… but to waste the resources to such an extent? well…. god save the world.

 
# December 1, 2009 at 01:37
Dustin says:

You can see the winning projects on the website, I think archdaily should publish them as well.

 
# December 1, 2009 at 02:07
L Ron says:

Oh no, please tell me it ain’t true… So they use ENERGY to pump lots of water to that height, and then use a turbine to ineffeciantly regenerate a small fraction of that energy? Pump a few gallons less up there, and you will have saved more energy than you will ever generate. Not to mention that it’s a huge tower pumping water vertically for no real reason.
“The structure is completely self-sufficient”. Right.
Such a huge misunderstanding of what sustainability means. Architects should be required to take physics.

 
# December 1, 2009 at 02:38
Nina says:

A very surrealistic and beautiful project, nice idea.

 
# December 1, 2009 at 03:17
Francesco says:

Google would say “Do you mean http://d3architectes.fr/images/chanchan01.jpg ?”

Anyway, I don’t understand why archdaily is posting this and how can people comment this joke so seriously!!!

 
# December 1, 2009 at 04:13
margo says:

childish

 
# December 1, 2009 at 04:50
Anna says:

Its an idea competition and I love it!
Anyway, I totally understand why archdaily is posting this and how people comment on this lovely piece of architecture so seriously!

Hey mr F, just so you know, Three exclamation marks actually emphasizes something else then your comment.

 
# December 1, 2009 at 04:51
Julia Haynes says:

Insane and strange but also fantastic and positive. I like it. And that roof pool takes the infinite pool concept to new heights. . .

 
# December 1, 2009 at 04:57
Mark X says:

Another trash competition by Arquitectum. They have to stop encouraging students to do sci-fi and fairy tales. You guys say it is an idea. If the idea does not solve function, structure, etc., it is not architecture. Then Pixar and Lucas Film can do better.

 
# December 1, 2009 at 05:52
CrazySwedish says:

How can someone design like this?
Is this architecture, with no sense at all?
All the negative points on the comments… the self-called architects from visiondivision are not smart enough to think about all that when designing..
if with doubts, just check their ego-promotion page: http://www.visiondivision.com/
(advise: eat some magic mushrooms before clicking on the projects section…:)

 
# December 1, 2009 at 06:21
    javier says:

    man, how can you be so upset? get a life

     
    # December 1, 2009 at 06:27
toast says:

zoo-ropey

 
# December 1, 2009 at 08:58
alex says:

not sure how it’ll work, but I LOVE it. these ideas are why I love my profession. as silly as it sounds now, pushing the limits of what a certain program can be is really the bee’s knees. remember, all innovative ideas are discredited as ’stupid’ at first.

 
# December 1, 2009 at 10:17
max says:

I was just wondering how peaceful and comfortable life could be for those poor animals living with the noise of a huge mass of water falling down everywere around them (2times niagara’s falls should be very noisy! don’t you think?).
even,
the pool on the roof is something like the cherry on the top of the cake…
please leave fresh water dolphins where they actually do enjoy and try to survive!

 
# December 1, 2009 at 12:10
cad says:

I want to ride on Flipper

 
# December 1, 2009 at 14:39
johannas says:

This is one of the coolest designs I’ve seen in years, thank you archdaily! I wish i could be involved in a project like this! It would change the WORLD!

 
# December 1, 2009 at 15:13
SRmiK says:

This really excites me. I don’t know how sustainable it is and how constructible but it is visually stimulating and a very interesting concept. I feel projects like this, realised or not, enable the continued development and exploration of architecture. At the very least, it stimulates discussion.

 
# December 1, 2009 at 16:48
laar says:

Visiondivision is Visiondivision. They always have a lot of fun in their projects. Why not?

 
# December 1, 2009 at 17:07
Tosh says:

I’ve got a better idea for this project and projects like that in general – why don’t we just put radiators outside and try to heat our planet – I mean, after all – obviously we are trying to cause more CO2 emission anyway,right?

 
# December 1, 2009 at 17:17
Scozia says:

Would the dolphins know not to jump over the edge of the infinity pool and fall to certain death?

 
# December 2, 2009 at 04:58
João B says:

in a smaller scale, could be another pavillion in the EXPO 2010… it perfectly matches all the requirements (?????) for it…

 
# December 2, 2009 at 12:34
The Duke says:

this is one epic building, Im so impressed by the images, just cool all the way to the bones!

 
# December 2, 2009 at 13:57
marbress says:

el lugar de emplazamiento es una “reserva” por lo cuál es impensable toda edificación. el área es ambición de intereses inmobiliarios que acechan permanentemente, hasta hoy sin éxito. espero sincera mente que este concurso sea solo un ejercicio arquitectónico y no la punta de lanza de una “colonización” de la reserva. en ese marco considero que el proyecto no ha considerado la realidad del lugar, la absoluta contaminación del río de la plata, somete a los animales a un hábitat totalmente inadecuado, la eficiencia energética no es posible (el consumo para elevar el agua supera 100 veces lo que la caída piede generar), en fin… talvés sean ideas aplicables a dubai … por favor dejen a la reserva en paz!

 
# December 8, 2009 at 22:01
marbress says:

the locations is a “reserve” at any building which is unthinkable. the area is ambitious real estate interests that lurk permanently, so far without success. mind sincere hope that this contest is only an exercise in architectural and not the spearhead of a “colonization” of the reservation. in this context I consider that the project has not considered the reality of the place, the absolute pollution of the river of silver, subjects animals to a totally unsuitable habitat, energy efficiency is not possible (to raise the water consumption exceeds 100 times what the fall piede generate), prob-ably be in order … applicable to dubai … ideas please leave in peace to the reserve!

 
# December 8, 2009 at 22:24

Links to this article »

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

Haven’t a clue. I was unable to force myself to care enough to finish his novella....[+]
It is good– better than jurgen meyer: simpler...[+]
A pretentious, egotistical blowhard, and in the field of architecture? How utterly...[+]
I fully understand that it is not just about the building. I fully understand the idea,...[+]
I like the stair and the external view I can’t imagine the spaces...[+]
The building is beautiful. But it’s not about the building only… its about...[+]
Stourley Kracklite on 4 Houses / On Office:
I like purism as well as the next guy, so I am very interested in how the...[+]
I like the overall design of it, but in combination with the abandoned dessert location...[+]
I like the yurt argument… yes, it is clearly a client-wooing...[+]
Don’t ask… you’ll just get some lengthy BS answer.[+]
Yes, this is clearly a yourt inspiration :rollseyes:[+]
I like this building … but the pretentious,kitchy heart? …why?[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »