Have you seen our interviews in High Definition?

Kamyk Heritage Park / Tamizo Architects

By Sebastian J — Filed under: Hotels and Restaurants , Mixed Use , ,
 

PortadaPoland based Tamizo Architects have sent us their latest project, the Kamyk Heritage Park. The idea of the park’s concept was to create a kind of small village with a few different buildings/functions which mix village with contemporary style at the same time.

The plot is located in a small village in Poland called Kamyk. It’s quite big and it’s located in a village landscape plot with two small ponds in the center of it. The main building of the whole concept and a first part of the competition was a restaurant/wedding house building.

More images and full architect’s description after the break.

One of the most important guideline for this project was that the building should be able to serve three separate wedding parties at the same time which should be serviced by one kitchen. Of course the plan should be flexible and in case of big parties, the need to merge it in one space.

The architecture of the building should be modern but at the same time it should correspond to the surrounding buildings character. That’s why we use typical sloping thatched roofs as a symbol of the village style and simple white walls with big openings as a contrast and symbol of present time architecture.

The openings give a great view at the beautiful landscape. The building consists in 3 separate solids with restaurant areas joined by the main entrance area and the kitchen. In a center of it there is a big rectangular patio.

The second part of the ‘Kamyk Heritage Park’ consists in a small hotel building for the wedding parties guests. It could be designed as a part of the restaurant building, but because of the functional aspects we decided to design it as a separate building. The function was realy simple: six rooms for the parties guests and some technical rooms.

The main challenge was to define solids which could correspond to the scale and character of the village. Our final decision was to tract each hotel room as a separate house. The mix of six different wooden houses with white simple boxes give us an interesting result which was quite different than the wedding house building, but at the same time it suits well to it. The whole concept will be completed by following functions: temporary market with local vegetables, fruits, meats, cheeses… small scene for occasional ceremony, and others…

 

27 comments »

a floating design house, which is perfect

 
# October 30, 2009 at 11:36
Sun says:

bloody awesome

 
# October 30, 2009 at 12:05
    jonas says:

    bloody agree

     
    # November 1, 2009 at 15:27
Fudge says:

This is probably the most attractive pitched roof design I have ever seen. I cant tell if these images are renders or photographs. Though they must be renders, I love the Audi as an accessory to the building.

 
# October 30, 2009 at 12:09
Scott says:

Very nice. I would like a detail of that thatch.

Skinny Poles are going to have to sit at those tables though. Yikes!

 
# October 30, 2009 at 12:10
Jesse says:

Renderings are beautiful. Does anyone know what software they may have used?

 
# October 30, 2009 at 12:29
arlides says:

seems like 3dmax studio renders…..those are very good renders

 
# October 30, 2009 at 12:39
viking says:

renders, audi … is it archdaily or picdaily? too many pictures and no real message with it

 
# October 30, 2009 at 18:03
the uninformed observer says:

Will be worshipped for decades…

 
# October 30, 2009 at 18:33
temple says:

awesome architecture!good viz!nice planing! renders vray+shop

 
# October 30, 2009 at 20:44
Jose says:

MOST AWESOME PIECE OF ARQCHITECTURE SINCE LONG TIME.

 
# October 31, 2009 at 06:08
Tom_92 says:

Poland rocks !!! Good job, I hope it won’t end up with it ;)

 
# October 31, 2009 at 08:21
GS says:

they forgot to include the Audi TT in the drawings…

 
# October 31, 2009 at 12:48
    Goldschmidt R says:

    Ha ha ha. Gs you have to go home or you must wake up. What is this comment?
    And by the way, that is not TT. Christ go and learn at least some architecture!

     
    # October 31, 2009 at 13:37
      zoltan says:

      To Goldschmidt R…

      That IS a TT. Definitely.
      I learned some architecture.
      Arcitecture is nice and simple.
      Presentation very beautiful.
      What else do you need?

       
      # November 1, 2009 at 23:56
PB says:

it’s really beautiful. the design team should be proud

 
# October 31, 2009 at 23:47
tamizo says:

why polish are still copying others?

 
# November 1, 2009 at 03:52
    rodrigo says:

    “They still copying others” and themselves – all the time the same projects and renderings – walls, columns rofs – but where is architecture, IDEA?

     
    # November 2, 2009 at 02:37
xenia says:

where is the site plan?
dont understand the setting of the project…

 
# November 1, 2009 at 03:55
john avlakiotis says:

beautiful work! I love it

 
# November 1, 2009 at 09:29
Ricardo says:

The pitched roofs look superb, but the white flat-roofed connections look clumsy: too heavy, too thick. There’s little integration, little balance. It diminishes the elegance of the rest.

I think that the toilet array is naif. There’s always a need for a common space in restaurant-wedding pavillions’ rest rooms – assisting children, grooming conversation, “powdering-the-nose” chit-chat, and the bride will usually need assistance with her dress… girls do go in groups to the rest rooms in Poland too, don’t they? Besides, no accessible toilet for handicapped?

Moreover: where’s the kitchen? In another building? Where will the other buildings in the vicinity be? Xenia is right: a site plan (at least) should be shown, because the relations between the buildings themselves, and the site, aren’t clear (there’s water, there’s grass, there’s a vehicle path… nothing else?). Besides, if the purity of the isolatedly displayed buildings is compromised by the presence of other elements not depicted, then there would be a flaw, and the display would be trying fool us into not showing it. Notice: I’m not stating that this flaw exists; I just wish that there were a site plan, an aerial view or a common perspective that wouldn’t make people suspect it.

 
# November 2, 2009 at 08:29
Dekodex says:

even if I consider this images as skatches I have to ask about the toilets…ARE YOU CRAZY???? You know how to render now learn how to make buildings. Becouse there is functional nor spatial relationships, and construction is chubby as well. Concrete roof with wooden construction inside? But still, form is nice I must say…

 
# November 3, 2009 at 03:50
SAKTI says:

cute

 
# November 3, 2009 at 22:58
sullka says:

I found out about these guys in Vray related forums when some of them were still students.

I really hope they start building those ideas, they sure produce beautiful architecture that shouldn’t remain in renderings.

C’mon potential clients, start hiring them!

 
# November 4, 2009 at 11:58
Little girl says:

How beautiful this project is!pure!Less is more,which I blieve from now on.

 
# November 6, 2009 at 21:28

Links to this article »

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

88 people died[+]
Great project. I love that depressed ground floor,...[+]
I think architects are getting more confused by the...[+]
this building is awsome![+]
very nice lighting inside[+]
I used the brick first[+]
very nice… agree whit the first comment…we...[+]
Agh..!! Didn’t like it AT ALL..!!...[+]
the problem with this is that...[+]
isn’t that what all...[+]
very beautiful. I would love to visit there...[+]
wow! all that wood, wow![+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »