Have you seen our interviews in High Definition?

Frog Queen / SPLITTERWERK

By Nico Saieh — Filed under: Institutional Architecture , Offices , Selected , ,
 
Photo © Nikolaos Zachariadis, SPLITTERWERK

Photo © Nikolaos Zachariadis, SPLITTERWERK

Architects: SPLITTERWERK
Location: Graz, Steiermark, Austria
Project team: Irene Berto, Mark Blaschitz, Erika Brunnermayer, Marius Ellwanger, Hannes Freiszmuth, Johann Grabner, Edith Hemmrich, Ute Himmelberg, Bernhard Kargl, Benjamin Nejedly, Josef Roschitz, Maik Rost, Ingrid Somitsch, Nikolaos Zachariadis
Client: PRISMA Engineering Maschinen- und Motorentechnik GmbH
Project Management: Ingenos ZT GmbH
Structural Consultant: werkraum zt-gmbh, Peter Bauer, David Lemp
Building Services Consultant: Ing. Rudolf Sonnek GmbH
HVACR Design: Guenter Grabner
Energy Consultant: Dr. Tomberger ZT GesmbH, Hannes Veitsberger
Electrical Design: Erich Watzke, Moskon & Busz GmbH, Rudolf Busz
Project Area: 1,400 sqm
Project year: 2009
Photographs: © Nikolaos Zachariadis

Photo © Nikolaos Zachariadis, SPLITTERWERK Photo © Nikolaos Zachariadis, SPLITTERWERK Photo © Nikolaos Zachariadis, SPLITTERWERK Photo © Nikolaos Zachariadis, SPLITTERWERK

The Graz-based design collective SPLITTERWERK was commissioned to design this headquarters building for PRISMA Engineering, a machine and motor technology company also located in Graz. The objective was to design a structure which could house the company’s various research and development programs, and selectively showcase the work to a varied range of often competing clientele. Thus the building design needed to accommodate both high- end testing and presentation without jeopardizing the security and secrecy with which the work is developed.

Photo © Nikolaos Zachariadis, SPLITTERWERK

Photo © Nikolaos Zachariadis, SPLITTERWERK

Photo © Nikolaos Zachariadis, SPLITTERWERK

Photo © Nikolaos Zachariadis, SPLITTERWERK

The building form approximates a cube, measuring 18.125 x 18.125 x 17m, wrapped on all four elevations with a pixilated pattern of square panels. From a distance, these panels appear to be painted in a range of ten values of grey tone, together dematerializing the volume of the building against both the trees of the surrounding site and the clouds and sky. Thus the cubic building is at once monumental in its objecthood in the open landscape – scale-less and immaterial – and yet utterly non-iconographic in its overall form.

interior elevations

interior elevations

As is characteristic of their work, SPLITTERWERK was interested in developing a play between pictorial image and spatial experience. Working with the effects of dimension, distance, and time, the building’s skin was designed to generate shifting perceptions of the volume and texture. As one approaches the building, the cubic proportions of the volume become apparent, as does the finer grain of surface articulation on each panel, comprised not of a single grey tone but rather a tight grid of abstract pictorial figures. These figures might be interpreted as flowers, speaking to the surrounding fields, or gear wheels, suggestive of the highly secretive work happening inside the building. Each façade panel is itself nearly square, measuring 67 x 71.5-cm, and made of powder-coated aluminum, screen-printed with the various images. Integrated within this field of figures, deployed at the scale of both panel and building, windows and doors are similarly considered such that they essentially disappear within the composition of the façade.

Photo © Nikolaos Zachariadis, SPLITTERWERK

Photo © Nikolaos Zachariadis, SPLITTERWERK

At the interior, individual office spaces are wallpapered with images of the surrounding Eastern Styrian landscape, creating a conceptual tension between the interior of the building envelope (narrative and pictorial) and the visual effects of its exterior panels (abstract and spatial). In this sense, the decorative strategy for both interior and exterior is conceived with certain landscape sensibilities in mind; a visual context which is simultaneously pictorial in its framed references and affective in the atmosphere it produces.

 

28 comments »

furqiii says:

i serious love it. it’s amazing. the design has been very well interpreted from concept to physical form.

 
# October 28, 2009 at 13:47
ErickF says:

I really love the pixeled kind of facades.

 
# October 28, 2009 at 14:02
eb says:

what a fun project!

 
# October 28, 2009 at 14:44
nal says:

wonderful…not certain about how the wall images will do over the lifespan of the building, but seems like it would be a great place to work.

 
# October 28, 2009 at 15:47
kc says:

stop the pixelation of architecture…..

 
# October 28, 2009 at 17:21
    Tuf-Pak says:

    Start the Pixelization of architecture!

     
    # October 28, 2009 at 22:55
      Bir Dumann says:

      guys pixelation of architecture just do not exist!

       
      # October 29, 2009 at 03:18
Dan says:

im sorry for being so negative, but I think that this calls for it. What an awful awful building! I am amazed that we architects still exist. Nice section, but overall an awful building.

 
# October 28, 2009 at 18:06
    Luis says:

    “I am amazed that we architects still exist”???? Dan you must be “The Architect”. Show as your work. We need to know what a real architect can do.

     
    # October 29, 2009 at 19:17
Forrest says:

A fairly attractive and dumb-in-a-good-way building. I don’t think the resolution is quite right. A finer grain might make it more intricate.

 
# October 28, 2009 at 18:12
Francisco says:

I love the interiors-exterior whit this landscape-walls. The pixelate i been seen before.

 
# October 28, 2009 at 18:35
the uninformed observer says:

An absolute winner. All stairs- would like to have seen that essential, constant transitional space- complete mirror cladding, yum.

 
# October 28, 2009 at 19:52
Tuf-Pak says:

Seriously, I’m stunned that this is garnering some really negative comments. I doubt it was meant as anything terribly serious…it doesn’t portend to be anything but a fun little building. It’s somewhat like a modern Ledoux customs house.

Who can argue with fun?

 
# October 28, 2009 at 22:58
camilo p says:

love it! simple and fun

 
# October 29, 2009 at 02:33

woow

 
# October 29, 2009 at 05:15
Patricioicio says:

Active fronts ….. well for the audacity of lso architects … curtain refreshes a bit not so many fronts of wall glaze….

 
# October 29, 2009 at 07:27
Adhitecture says:

“Fun”tastic idea..
cool artistic stuff..

 
# January 19, 2010 at 21:23

Links to this article »

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

love the picts, it has an ethereal quality to it for sure.[+]
From Dusk Till Dawn[+]
David Basulto on Rosa Muerta / Robert Stone:
Why not? If the author wants to decorate it that way, it’s ok. Actually, I...[+]
Haven’t a clue. I was unable to force myself to care enough to finish his novella....[+]
It is good– better than jurgen meyer: simpler...[+]
A pretentious, egotistical blowhard, and in the field of architecture? How utterly...[+]
I fully understand that it is not just about the building. I fully understand the idea,...[+]
I like the stair and the external view I can’t imagine the spaces...[+]
The building is beautiful. But it’s not about the building only… its about...[+]
Stourley Kracklite on 4 Houses / On Office:
I like purism as well as the next guy, so I am very interested in how the...[+]
I like the overall design of it, but in combination with the abandoned dessert location...[+]
I like the yurt argument… yes, it is clearly a client-wooing...[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »