Emergency Terminal / Produkcija 004

Uploaded by — Filed under: Public Facilities ,Selected , , , ,
 

ET_020

Architect: Produkcija 004
Location: Zagreb,
Client: City of Zagreb and Zagreb Holding
Project architects: Davor Katušic & Martina Ljubičic
Project team: Margareta Ćurić,d.i.a., Jana Kocbek, u.d.i.a., Robert Franjo, arh. teh., Ivo Petrić, d.i.a., Marija Burmas, d.i.a.
Graphic Design: Juri Armanda, Karl Geisler, Bor Dizdar
Builder: Dalekovod d.d., ZagrebMontaža d.d.
Project area: 15,000 sqm
Budget: 15 mil. Euro
Project year: 2009
Photographs: Produkcija 004

ET_017 ET_009 ET_013 ET_016

ET_019

Through a synthesis of architectural genres (hospital, clinic, garage, administrative, and educational buildings) the Emergency terminal emerges as a new urban sign of safety, competence and speed. The 8-story facility includes a reception and telecommunications service, resuscitation clinic, in-patient clinic, Zagreb City’s medical supply storage, a lecture hall and classrooms, a laboratory, administration service, technical service and multi-story garage accommodating 170 medical vehicles.

section 01

section 01

Measuring up to the high criteria of contemporary architecture, the institution, approximately 14,000 sqm in surface area, can serve 2 million citizens. The skeletal construction with supported ceiling plates meets the architectural demands of lightness and spatial variability. An effective and rational solution for the large surface of the façade is the membrane net structure.

ET_016

ET_009

Within the heterogeneous surrounding the translucent character of the material (textile membrane – precontraint) contributes to the varying perception of the building during the day versus during the night. In the daylight the house dominates with its volume and attracts with the cleanness (sterility) of white. When lit up at night the membrane façade turns the entire house into a large, white lantern –the white cube becomes an illuminated landmark.

ET_012

 
 
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Richie says:

This is very slick.. there’s some very commendable architecture coming out of Croatia lately.

 
# October 28, 2009 at 06:53
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Tina says:

    Hahaaha, you are quite right. It’s a popular trend in Croatia.

     
    # October 28, 2009 at 09:09
Thumb up Thumb down 0
roadkill says:

Does anyone have experience using textile membrane – precontraint? sounds like an interesting material but I have so many questions about it…

let us all know please what you think

 
# October 28, 2009 at 08:26
Thumb up Thumb down 0
blackstone says:

interesting project– very nice at night, but NOT during the day. the facade should have been designed to be more convincing when it is not illuminated from within.

 
# October 28, 2009 at 09:29
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Tuf-Pak says:

    I have to disagree. At least in the aerial view, the image of the building during the day is nice to me. A big swan white monolith. That day to dusk transition must be interesting.

     
    # October 28, 2009 at 22:44
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    bla says:

    don’t know about the others, but i really like it during day, the building has a dreamy look, all white and semi transparent and.. not solid. And since there’s no public spaces near, you mostly see it from your car/bus.
    so while driving towards it, you see something rising above surrounding building, but doesn’t look like one itself.

     
    # October 29, 2009 at 06:08
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      blackstone says:

      NOT solid? let’s not be fooled by the photos taken at dawn or dusk, which are nice but a fleeting condition. a couple other photos clearly indicate just what a big, white, monolithic box this is during most of the daylight hours.

       
      # October 30, 2009 at 09:42
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    bla says:

    i wasn’t fooled by the photos because i live nearby and see that terminal almost every day. it really doesn’t look solid, that’s a fact. and i like it this way, much more than i would like it if it had glass facade- but that’s my opinion, you really don’t have to agree with me ;)
    +those aerial photos don’t mean a thing, no one sees it from that perspective
    it’s wrong to judge architecture by the photos you see ‘cos that’s not what architecture’s all about, but hey, i do it too for most of the buildings..

     
    # October 30, 2009 at 13:27
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      Muse says:

      I must agree with you; the building IS milky-translucent, but not in the “obvious”, glass-covered way. From the distance is seems like a white solid, but as you’re getting closer it reveals it’s inner structure and form, giving us an interesting visual experience.

      Therefore, aerial photos can’t show us the building’s spatial effect and it’s radiosity – that is, in my opinion, a correct statement.

      The subject of showing function on the facade is here both affirmed and denied, for many hours could we discuss the pros and cons of this approach.

      I’ve heard, though, that some functional faults exist – it is something that only the users are allowed to comment. I’m no doctor or a nurse ;)

      All in all, visually and technically refreshing and inspiring, yet to be prooven good (functionally) architecture.

       
      # November 12, 2009 at 09:23
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Zitoon says:

    Blackstone : do you dare show us some of your work?

     
    # November 6, 2009 at 18:40
Thumb up Thumb down 0
ethem says:

reminds me of this :
Santralistanbul
project year 2006

http://thomasmayerarchive.de/search.php?search_keywords=Santralistanbul&sessionid=a721419feda3acab7016586c1e431229&l=english

 
# October 28, 2009 at 10:26
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Pierre says:

    Ouuuuuuuuu
    So true

     
    # October 28, 2009 at 13:45
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Nathan says:

Exposed steel in a post-disaster building? Yikes!

 
# October 28, 2009 at 23:45
    Thumb up Thumb down 0

    It complies with US fire proof standards.

     
    # November 2, 2009 at 17:00
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      Nathan says:

      How?

       
      # November 3, 2009 at 21:37
Thumb up Thumb down 0
powkey says:

What is an emergency terminal!? It looks like a place where helicopters carrying wounded can drop them off to be switched to ambulances and the other way around. correct?

 
# October 29, 2009 at 04:50
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    bla says:

    that too, but it’s more like a parking building for ER vehicles

     
    # October 29, 2009 at 05:29
Thumb up Thumb down 0
robert says:

that light cube has nothing to do with the site, modern materials doesn’t mean all the time great arch….just my thoughts

 
# October 29, 2009 at 09:34
Thumb up Thumb down 0
motefan says:

Just wanted to point out that the cost of construction for this project is about US$130 per square foot. That’s amazingly low for such a well-executed building. I think you’d be hard-pressed to find similarly cost-effective projects on this blog.

 
# October 29, 2009 at 10:33
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    mas says:

    Project area: 15,000 sqm
    Budget: 15 mil. Euro

    How do you get 130 usd?

    Anyway, I’ve seen this building and it does impress you more than pictures.

     
    # November 1, 2009 at 13:59
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      Gorgos says:

      15000 square meter for 15 mil euro = 1000 euro/m2

      approx 11 square foot in 1 square meter = 90 euro/f2

      exchange rate is approx 1.5 -> 90 x1.5 = 135 dollars per square foot.

       
      # November 1, 2009 at 14:26
Thumb up Thumb down 0
mas says:

My mistake, I assumed square meter not square foot. Didn’t read carefully.

 
# November 1, 2009 at 17:33
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Pernille says:

I have to say I’m very happy to see these pictures.
I lived in Zagreb a year ago during the construction period. Already by then I found the building very interesting and also quite well functioning visually during the day. and it is true, you basically only pass it by car and the facade changes character as you pass by.
I like how someone detected a problem, in this case how to get the patient to the right department the fastest way, and then made an architecture that deals with this problem in a very simple, but clever way.

 
# November 5, 2009 at 10:28
Thumb up Thumb down 0

7:05 AM Jul 31st

Emergency Terminal / Produkcija 004 http://bit.ly/mYdTFj #Zagreb #architecture

Leave a Reply »

 

Latest Comments »

reading again the same ol’ simplifications is not funny. reading a...[+]
aaaaaaaaaaaaand I’m done.[+]
Now GO decorate some wall.[+]
The best chance of making the UK a...[+]
Architects have no use for cutesy, valueless generalizations about their...[+]

Upcoming Architecture Events »

got events? invite us! click here

Architecture Books & Magazines »

Cebra Files 02

Cebra Files 02

We recently received a monograph of Cebra’s work. This young firm is energetic, pushes the boundaries, goes after competitions, and has been successful in pushing many projects into reality. We are fan their work and have featured Cebra 16…

 

Passive Solar Architecture / David A. Bainbridge and Ken Haggard

Passive Solar Architecture / David A. Bainbridge and Ken Haggard

David Bainbridge, founder of the Passive Solar Institute, recently sent us his book Passive Solar Architecture. The book is a great introduction for anyone interested in passive solar architecture. The content is kept simple and straightforward. It allows any…

 

Volume 27: Aging

Volume 27: Aging

I never can get enough of Volume. This issue is loaded with provocative articles that stimulate discussion about a pressing reality, the dramatic demographic shift in the age of human populations. Throughout this issue there are articles like Martti…

 

Our partners »

AD on iPad via Pulse

Browse by date »

Browse by category »

Friends »