Visit our Products section to learn more about architectural products.

White O / Toyo Ito

By Nico Saieh — Filed under: Houses , Selected , , , ,
 

White O_Toyo Ito (75)

Architect: Toyo Ito & Associates, Architects
Location: Marbella, Chile
Local Architect: Christian de Groote
Project Area: 370 sqm
Project year: 2009
Photographs: Nicolas Saieh

White O_Toyo Ito (11) White O_Toyo Ito (22) White O_Toyo Ito (62) White O_Toyo Ito (77)

The site for this weekend house slopes gently down to the north-east, and has attractive views in the same direction. This proposal is intended to make dynamic use of the whole site, taking advantage of the special qualities created by this slope. White O_Toyo Ito (10) White O_Toyo Ito (1)

The house and site are composed together as a single continuous space, flowing along a spiral movement path, and centered on a partially enclosed garden. The approach to the house rises along the natural line of the slope, drawing visitors toward the rear of the site. Within the inner garden, the slope becomes continuous with the floor of the house, and then flows around and up to the more private areas of the house.

ground floor plan

ground floor plan

White O_Toyo Ito (68)

Beyond the entrance is a spacious living area, which leads on to an adjacent dining area. We expect that the inner garden and the living and dining spaces will be used together, allowing a free indoor-outdoor lifestyle. Further ascending via a gentle ramp which wraps around the inner garden, the interior makes a fluid transition into a private zone containing bedrooms. Floating above the ground, these spaces have complete privacy.

White O_Toyo Ito (41)

Ascending the slope to the rear of the site, entering the house, and moving through the continuous interior – the house and site composed as a fluid progression of interior and exterior spaces with gradually changing characters and orientations.

 

44 comments »

oo says:

just these furnitures, colors, materials and textures destroys space…

 
# September 22, 2009 at 15:13
md says:

looks like an open grave…where are all the bodies?

 
# September 22, 2009 at 15:56
Timo says:

“just these furnitures, colors, materials and textures destroys space…”

…must be the stupidest comment ever in arcdaily. houses are not suposed to be somekind of museums-of-space. houses are meant for people to live in, and with people comes their furniture that make the house a home.

we are not creating just spaces, we are creating places for people to live and work and eat and enjoy..

 
# September 22, 2009 at 16:29
    fl!p says:

    i agree with you! it makes it a home!

     
    # September 22, 2009 at 20:39
    GAP says:

    I also agree with yours opinions that it’s important to create places for people to live not for anaesthetic people.
    have you a web site for look somethings else ?

    Mandi

     
    # September 23, 2009 at 02:52
luna says:

is it a bad design? or bad construction? or bad photography?

 
# September 22, 2009 at 16:52
    Rod Nuffert says:

    And why do you think there’s something bad?
    Is there some reason or you just “think so”?

     
    # September 22, 2009 at 17:03

Well I think it’s different, not bad, just different. It is grazing the austere that much is certain, but that is not a bad thing if it conforms to the people that live there, which is the ultimate goal of architecture, to please and fulfill the client’s needs.
The views are definitely a plus.
It’s certainly worth a second look to study the end result.

 
# September 22, 2009 at 16:59
Wargo says:

When people leave their office,hospital or warehouse and see this, they can think that the work never ends.

 
# September 22, 2009 at 17:55
md says:

this building will cause people to lose their minds and kill their fellow man…a pitty, really….some cool spaces though and probably some killer views.

 
# September 22, 2009 at 18:13
isla says:

please who made the decoration, what a way to kill space.

 
# September 22, 2009 at 20:07
it says:

corbu is alive……..

 
# September 22, 2009 at 22:34
phlill says:

While I like the open views to the mountains and the surroundings, it does seem rather transparent and open to the street it fronts on and all sides to its neighbours. Was there no need for any privacy – or is it just about being viewed?

 
# September 22, 2009 at 23:38
    Valentine says:

    I daresay your idea that the building leaves the inhabitants exposed is short sighted, no pun intended. If you check out the main floor plan you will see that Mr. Ito wisely made allowances for the installation for blinds or shades in the bedrooms. In addition it appears to be pretty spacious where the house is located so I would assume that the neighbors aren’t washing their dishes in your living room. I think this house has many striking areas and some cool concepts to explore such as entering from underneath and ascending into an open courtyard facing both the sky and the building. Altogether as a student of architecture this building is fairly thrilling in that it veers away from conventions of a home and forgive my ignorance but that is something that I have some difficulty facilitating in a meaningful way. I’ll return to the entry way as an example, ultimately the building more specifically the bedrooms create a sort of arch-entry and you enter to the rear of the building through no proper door while being shown through the interior of the house. Which I would say is a private space due to the way the building is elevated and not opened.

     
    # September 30, 2009 at 23:50
theDude says:

Nice quality insitu conc building, a little austere perhaps. The external furniture and tables etc. look a bit “added on” though. I hope the clients are happy with the house as they spent a small fortune no doubt. In my opinion, not Ito’s best house…
I really like the sandblasted corridor facade, looks great!

 
# September 23, 2009 at 02:10
nombre says:

These collums are horrible placed and als much to big i think.

 
# September 23, 2009 at 06:26
Jeison says:

I remember being very curious when Archdaily featured this house when it was in progress. Honestly, the result is a disappointment to me. Plus, the kitchen seems is just sad. Too bad.

 
# September 23, 2009 at 07:57
helen says:

i think the rethinking of living space is really quite wonderful and the concept is extremely well executed.

that aside i do agree with the above opinions that the cheesy and cheap looking interior decoration robs the potential away from the elegance of the design.

great job from toyo ito though!

 
# September 23, 2009 at 09:08
C.P.T.L. says:

I’ve seen photos of superyachts (of the motoring type, not the sailers) and they were ugly, every one. No matter how one dressed them up or pared them down, with dramatic lines or utter simplicity, they could not escape their form, giant machine-hotels driving on the sea. Some rare few achieved a measure of beauty, but at the expense of functionality, isolating the occupants amid the sculpting necessary to rescue the form from blunt utility.

But it occurred to me that they were probably a lot of fun to be on, as facilities for being on the sea and enjoying it, looking out, the occupants being the only ones in the vicinity that did not have to suffer the ungainly appearance of the boat.

Perhaps this structure will operate like that.

 
# September 23, 2009 at 09:55
Iani says:

Very nice but… where is the sustainable design? or is this masterpiece is not on earth?

 
# September 23, 2009 at 11:19
zuba says:

Niko, did you take pictures of houses on the other side of the road? the house we see from the (ugly) bedroom looks interesting, too..

 
# September 23, 2009 at 11:21
Jeison says:

Zuba, I´d like to see that house too!

 
# September 23, 2009 at 14:19
SLAM! says:

In my opinion, there is something to be interesting in this design, in terms of the relation between the interiors themselves and the enviroment.

At least here, in Chile, there’s almost always a pattern in the conception of houses, specially weekend houses. The public spaces (living room, dinning room, terraces), get the privilege views and positions in the composition; while the bedrooms, sometimes exept from the main one, are positioned in a totally secondary context.

I think there’s something in this house that the architect wants to propose, something about the way people here live their houses. Don’t know if that’s meant to be like that or not, but that’s what i get looking at this design.

Cheers from Chile!

 
# September 23, 2009 at 14:45
Rupesh Jamkhindikar says:

This is fantastic….a superb piece of architecture…such an elegant space creation…I would love to have a holiday home like this…..kudos….

 
# September 23, 2009 at 23:54

he choose very sad day for take the pictures!

 
# September 24, 2009 at 02:51
    Nico Saieh says:

    Sadly, I couldn’t choose the day. It was scheduled, so I had no choice.

     
    # September 24, 2009 at 09:37
      Tadao Cern says:

      Then please put the suny sky in these photos using PS, please:) joking man. you’ve done a great job.

       
      # September 25, 2009 at 02:47
Qwan says:

creative space but i think it’d be better when the ground fills green grass, It’s a house, people should relax in it

 
# September 24, 2009 at 23:50
askit says:

would love to be a kid with a bike or a skate living on that house. =)

 
# September 25, 2009 at 04:42
white O says:

it is just modyfied replica of U House from 1976

 
# September 25, 2009 at 07:32
white O says:

…but U House had strong unity between the form of space and articulation of the interior (it was ONE)…
in building from 2009 this harmony is destroyed by possition of windows and various kinds of furnitures, textures and colors…

this house doesnt look as Itos house, anymore
it is not so conceptual as in his old days…
the effect unfortunatelly
disappointing, Mr.Timo

 
# September 25, 2009 at 07:44
hello says:

come check me out on myspace.com dusty dolli it’s pukey

 
# September 27, 2009 at 16:38
paul says:

So many dead spaces and tight, unusable spaces. The materials and colours are shockingly un-homely and the entire project looks incomplete. Why would you want a house that consists of tight corridors and ramps? Active spaces are undefined – well, on by poorly selected roomsets of furniture

I normally love Ito’s work but this one isn’t impressive at all, nor is it at the other end of the spectrum in the way of being simple and logical.

 
# October 8, 2009 at 07:52
benjamin says:

Good design, very sad construction

 
# October 21, 2009 at 14:57

Links to this article »

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

the first thing I thought: tarantino moment the second thing I thought: tarantino...[+]
Eğitim, kültür, sanat, mizah, tarih ne ararsan nezih ve şeffaf..en iyi yapıtlar...[+]
E somos dois. Boring![+]
and I thought the Postmodernism movement was dead…[+]
i think the basic idea breaking the appartments in puzzle like pieces to form unit,...[+]
love the picts, it has an ethereal quality to it for sure.[+]
From Dusk Till Dawn[+]
David Basulto on Rosa Muerta / Robert Stone:
Why not? If the author wants to decorate it that way, it’s ok. Actually, I...[+]
Haven’t a clue. I was unable to force myself to care enough to finish his novella....[+]
It is good– better than jurgen meyer: simpler...[+]
A pretentious, egotistical blowhard, and in the field of architecture? How utterly...[+]
I fully understand that it is not just about the building. I fully understand the idea,...[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »