ArchDaily | Broadcasting Architecture Worldwidethe world's most visited architecture website
i

Sign up now and start saving and organizing your favorite architecture projects and photos

i

Find the most inspiring products for your projects in our Product Catalog.

i

Get the ArchDaily Chrome Extension and be inspired with every new tab. Install here »

h

Nominate now the Building of the Year 2017 »

All
Projects
Products
Events
Competitions
  1. ArchDaily
  2. Projects
  3. Installations & Structures
  4. Norway
  5. Reiulf Ramstad Architects
  6. 2010
  7. National Tourist Route Trollstigen / Reiulf Ramstad Architects + Oslo Norway

National Tourist Route Trollstigen / Reiulf Ramstad Architects + Oslo Norway

  • 01:00 - 20 August, 2009
National Tourist Route Trollstigen / Reiulf Ramstad Architects + Oslo Norway
National Tourist Route Trollstigen / Reiulf Ramstad Architects + Oslo Norway, Courtesy of Reiulf Ramstad Architects
Courtesy of Reiulf Ramstad Architects

Courtesy of Reiulf Ramstad Architects Courtesy of Reiulf Ramstad Architects Courtesy of Reiulf Ramstad Architects Courtesy of Reiulf Ramstad Architects +20

  • Architects

  • Location

    Romsdalen, Rauma, Norway
  • Project Team

    Reiulf D Ramstad, Christian Fuglset, Anja Strandskogen, Christian Dahle, Nok Nimakorn
  • Structural Engineer

    Dr Techn. Kristoffer Apeland AS, Oslo Norway
  • Mechanical Engineer

    Erichsen & Horgen Engineering AS, Oslo Norway
  • Electrical Engineer

    Norconsult, Norway
  • Client

    Norwegian public roads administration
  • Contractor

    Christie Opsahl AS, Norway
  • Area

    200000.0 sqm
  • Project Year

    2010
  • Photographs

From the architect. The project will enhance the experience of the Trollstigen plateau’s location and nature. Thoughtfulness regarding features and materials will underscore the site’s temper and character, and well-adapted, functional facilities will augment the visitor’s experience. The architecture is to be characterised by clear and precise transitions between planned zones and the natural landscape. Through the notion of water as a dynamic element –from snow, to running and then falling water- and rock as a static element, the project creates a series of prepositional relations that describe and magnify the unique spatiality of the site.

Courtesy of Reiulf Ramstad Architects
Courtesy of Reiulf Ramstad Architects
Location to be used only as a reference. It could indicate city/country but not exact address. Cite: "National Tourist Route Trollstigen / Reiulf Ramstad Architects + Oslo Norway" 20 Aug 2009. ArchDaily. Accessed . <http://www.archdaily.com/32441/national-tourist-route-trollstigen-rra/>
Read comments

37 Comments

buying real estate · September 21, 2013

Hi, Neat post. There's an issue with your website in web explorer, may check this¡K IE nonetheless is the marketplace chief and a big portion of other people will miss your excellent writing due to this problem.

Waterproof Camera · August 09, 2013

I have been surfing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It’s pretty worth enough for me. Personally, if all site owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet will be a lot more useful than ever before.

Computer System · August 04, 2013

Hi, Neat post. There's an issue along with your web site in web explorer, could check this¡K IE nonetheless is the marketplace chief and a big section of folks will leave out your wonderful writing because of this problem.

Party Dress · August 04, 2013

Nice weblog right here! Additionally your website a lot up fast! What web host are you using? Can I am getting your affiliate link for your host? I desire my site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

garden clippers · July 30, 2013

{many|numerous|several|a lot of|quite a few|lots of|a number of|a large number of} {tips|suggestions|ideas guidelines|recommendations|

Dario Pesantes · July 29, 2013

This is the appropriate blog for anyone who needs to seek out out about this topic. You understand so much its virtually onerous to argue with you (not that I truly would wantHaHa). You undoubtedly put a new spin on a topic thats been written about for years. Great stuff, just great!

Roni Stwart · July 27, 2013

There are some interesting deadlines on this article however I don?t know if I see all of them center to heart. There is some validity however I'll take maintain opinion till I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we want extra! Added to FeedBurner as effectively

Wilmer Lekberg · July 24, 2013

That is the best weblog for anybody who needs to seek out out about this topic. You understand a lot its virtually laborious to argue with you (not that I truly would needHaHa). You undoubtedly put a brand new spin on a subject thats been written about for years. Nice stuff, simply nice!

Rosendo Glidewell · July 19, 2013

Spot on with this write-up, I truly think this website needs rather more consideration. I?ll probably be again to read rather more, thanks for that info.

Arlinda Livi · July 14, 2013

A person necessarily lend a hand to make seriously content articles I'd state. That is the extremely first time I frequented your net page and thus far? I amazed using the research you made to make this actual article extraordinary. Excellent activity!

morteza · May 15, 2013

risk is a part of life...
so risky and beautiful :)

Turisdata · June 16, 2012

National Tourist Route Trollstigen / RRA | ArchDaily http://t.co/Fr4wS97T

Piotr Loska · February 12, 2012

Maciejowi "Mediafun" Budzichowi to by sie spodoba?o. http://t.co/YwKAo74m http://t.co/WGst2UtZ

Renata Tobar · February 11, 2012

National Tourist Route Trollstigen / Reiulf Ramstad Architects | ArchDaily http://t.co/zo0fpN6k via @archdaily

Curves 'Graph · February 11, 2012

National Tourist Route Trollstigen / Reiulf Ramstad Architects | ArchDaily http://t.co/Q4J91TET via @archdaily

Aly Alvy · January 24, 2012

Take a look...http://www.archdaily.com/32441/nation... #architecture #landscape

Furbe.blog · November 11, 2011

osservatorio #2 http://t.co/72SKFdw1

Chifâa M'chou · September 04, 2011

National Tourist Route Trollstigen / Reiulf Ramstad Architects | ArchDaily http://t.co/TgHOEeP via @archdaily

NodoBuenosAiresRAP · May 08, 2011

National Tourist Route Trollstigen / Reiulf Ramstad Architects | ArchDaily http://t.co/jqlfrGk vía @archdaily

Paisajes Posibles · May 08, 2011

National Tourist Route Trollstigen / Reiulf Ramstad Architects | ArchDaily http://t.co/jqlfrGk vía @archdaily

Kaisaisa · May 07, 2011

National Tourist Route Trollstigen / Reiulf Ramstad Architects | ArchDaily http://t.co/XqM7Kxx vía @archdaily

Mauricio · March 31, 2011

National Tourist Route Trollstigen / Reiulf Ramstad Architects | ArchDaily http://t.co/08ilpnF Edificio del año. (2009)

leida donald · November 23, 2010

@CLSLAND dbcooper0 RT NoMoreRespect: tayesoJUICY lol tomorrow im coming again think « lmaooo http://styj.02.ro/noqgn

trollstigen · March 12, 2010

I've been to the site, and have to say that the walk out to the platform is like a line to a Disney ride. The platform itself is impossible to enjoy because of all the fat, german bus-charter tourists everywhere, shoving around to get their picture taken, have a hot dog, buy a small troll, and leave.

OhNo · March 08, 2010

The architects are ruining this area. I live close by and I absolutely think it is ego masturbation by the architects and developers.

The highly praised platform is a wart on the horizon when approaching the site by road from the valley.

It is with no respect for local traditions, culture and nature this is done.

Roberto Rosales · March 04, 2010

me encantaria diseñar algo asi para chihuahua http://tinyurl.com/ybu8vok

Alex · September 02, 2009

Falling Water was built on the top of a beautiful waterfall, does this mean that the house is a damper on the natural beauty of its suroundings?

Sandro · September 01, 2009

I visited the site 3 times, before and during the construction (2002, 2007, 2008) and IMO the natural site was impressive enough without any architectural obstruction. Looks like an attempt to suck in more revenue from the site to me. I can understand the value of such construction if there would be a utility out of it, but in this case I really fail to see any. Admitted it is not an ugly piece of architecture, but ill positioned IMO. Much like whipped cream on top of a pizza. Good, but in the wrong place.

StructureHub Blog · August 24, 2009

Notwithstanding MZ's misgivings, I think the project is remarkably timeless despite its modernity, and actually has a solidity/durability that befits the rugged landscape it overlooks.

Ordinarily, I'd prefer an emphasis on stone in such a setting, but the cor-ten steel actually seems like an appropriately honest way of presenting a human analogue of the toughness of the natural landscape, in all of its angular, gritty randomness.

Terry Glenn Phipps · August 22, 2009

Clearly nothing is the preferable solution. Why build anything at all? Just think about it. Roads are bad, cars are bad, people are certainly bad, so it follows that there should be nothing. If we are very careful not to give anyone motivation to enjoy the beauty that is their natural heritage then maybe they will just sit at home and eat fair-trade organic mung beans while staring into their computers.

This project is what infrastructure is supposed to do. The architects have intelligently and forcefully responded to an incredible site and made a place that is accessible and stimulating. Looking at this I thought I really ought to go to Norway and have a look at that, the place is beautiful.

Terry Glenn Phipps
http://web.me.com/tgphipps

novan · August 22, 2009

very nice actually, as a travel destination it would be interesting.

Partick Bateman · August 21, 2009

i commend the norwegians for attempting something that would never be dreamt of in my country (scotland). We too have some stunning scenery, but it is often blighted by poorly designed rest stops (usually with a burger van sitting on some gravel, in a car park).

this is great!

Kalis · August 21, 2009

As for me the the viewing platform is a good idea, its pretty much more spectacular to be over the the cliff to get the view.

Baldur · August 21, 2009

The platform is most likely to enhance the view.
The idea is probably also to protect the surroundings - to concentrate the traffic in a specific and a secure way,
also to give access for the elderly and disabled to enjoy a stunning view.
In my opinion a wonderful project.
A thoughtful layout in a magnificent landscape - study the sections. The choice of materials is also fitting and underlines the surroundings and the purpose of the design.

JHunter · August 21, 2009

I agree, to an extent, but I can also see where the disagreement falls. Heidegger, for example, would disagree completely. By creating a structure, and one that is I think rather respectful and conscious of the landscape, a structure that is meant to bring a place for appreciation to those who lack it otherwise, we are just following our human nature to dwell/build/cultivate. It that place, by this structure, we are bringing together what already existed, something beautiful but lacking the woven integration a structure gives. Before this lookout was designed/created this spot along the ridge allowed for just as much as any other place, but now it is something special. It creates a moment for pausing, a place of destination, ect.
To disagree with this completely is to disagree with the basis of architecture, is it not?

Chris · August 21, 2009

Well said.

MZ · August 21, 2009

I don´t really want to give a comment the project itself, rather the programm: in my opinion there should not be ANY building at such a place. Isn´t it an obvious contraversy, to build railing in a terrain, where you can fall down all over anyways? Why do you need a view platform, when you have the exact same view 3 meters away, off the platform? Wouldn´t it be even more spectacular without the structure?

The project therefore can not be more, then a good answer to a bad question.

Richard Stafursky · August 22, 2009 05:00 PM

MZ,

You are not alone. Builders do this all the time. The natural landscape and plant and animal species do not respond to athletics the way humans do. Remember, human constructs always degrade the natural landscape at least 300 meters in all directions. So-called blending or harmonizing designs are used as an excuse to build in the natural landscape. People are always looking for excuses to expand their footprint into places that really should be left to natural processes and natural controls.

MZ, you are not alone.

Richard Stafursky
Brattleboro, VT USA
(802) 257-9158
World Species LIst Forest land trust
Conway, MA USA

Ball · August 21, 2009 12:54 PM

I disagree.
This is part of a bigger project that the public roads administration has going, and the way that I understand it these manifestations of often quite interesting architecture are built along a road that's already there, and at places where there was a need for rest stops anyway. I think it's a great idea to actually put some ambition into the making of these places, instead of following the usual [parking lot]+[shitter shed]+[benches] formula.
I also tend to agree with our psychopathic killer that the insertion of man made structures can heighten the impression of a site, through contrast. I think it's a fallacy, sprung out of some romantic heritage, to be to overly protective of the "unspoilt" nature.

Partick Bateman · August 21, 2009 12:18 PM

i sort of agree, but i also think that sometimes a building can enhance the environment, by providing a contrast.

···

Comments are closed

Read comments
Courtesy of Reiulf Ramstad Architects

National Tourist Route Trollstigen / Reiulf Ramstad Architects + Oslo Norway