Have you seen our interviews in High Definition?

Peace Bridge / Santiago Calatrava

By Karen Cilento — Filed under: Featured , Infrastructure , News , Structures , , ,
 

1250170528-12132-3-wan20calatrava20peace20bridge20calgary

Santiago Calatrava is known for his elegant bridges that combine structure with a sculpture-esque touch.  Yet, could his iconic style be changing?  His latest design for Calgary, Canada is a red and white tubular structure, an aesthetic quite unlike of his earlier works.  The new footbridge, slated for completion in 2010, will span the Bow River and aid approximately 5,000 people a day commuting in and out of the city on foot or on bike.

More about the bridge after the break.

1250170508-12132-1-wan20calatrava20calgary20bridge20aerial

The bright red bridge will span 130 meters and its helix design lacks the soaring masts, steel cables and asymmetrical design typical of a Calatrava project.  Since the bridge is for pedestrians and cyclists, separate paths will be incorporated so each can enjoy his journey over the bridge comfortably.  The bridge will also be covered in glass allowing Canadians to use the bridge throughout the year.

The bridge’s tubular form is a successful design solution as it could not have piers in the riverbed or vertical elements. “Seemingly simplistic at first glance, the Peace Bridge is a highly technical bridge,” Calatrava stated.

1250170515-12132-2-wan20calatrava20calgary20bridge

As seen on World Architecture News.

 

61 comments »

arch critic says:

i dont see bird wings….progress.

 
# August 13, 2009 at 17:53
    Pierre says:

    AHAHAHAHA
    It’s funny cuz it’s true!

     
    # August 13, 2009 at 17:55
    LucasAbreu says:

    so true!

     
    # August 13, 2009 at 23:00
    killuation says:

    cant agree more! lol

     
    # August 14, 2009 at 11:20
HamlëT says:

hahahahaha!! i agree with
no more birdwings..even the color looks great…

good to se the new progress on calatrava!

 
# August 13, 2009 at 18:08
James says:

Looks like a Chinese finger trap.

 
# August 13, 2009 at 18:26
LeRone says:

i love this…

 
# August 13, 2009 at 18:50
holz says:
# August 13, 2009 at 19:11
    mime says:

    i dont think so, maybe inspired by it. caltrava’s execution is much more graceful in terms of its pattern, the patterns scale, and finally some god dam color from santiago

     
    # August 13, 2009 at 23:19
    Paláu says:

    not even close… this is a good bridge not the best but quite good

     
    # August 14, 2009 at 01:51
    MARKO says:

    definitly copycat but with nice try to hide…

     
    # September 10, 2009 at 14:44
john says:

Looks way too easy. The only interesting image is the perspective, but if you think about it, it’s so cliche.

 
# August 13, 2009 at 20:06
Cynic says:

Would have been nice with some bird wings… otherwise boring.

 
# August 13, 2009 at 21:00
Juni says:

Calatrava met his psychologist. You can see He’s getting better now. Nice bridge, donno if I’d like to see it everyday in the city I live.

 
# August 13, 2009 at 21:38
Lone says:

This bridge is plainly not original enough for my acute sense of exciting originality or worth my ever expanding portfolio of exciting world-class original projects…
- Learn to hold you tongue before leaving comments that aren’t worth the energy spent writing them.

@holz
Why attempt to point out a copycat for such a common natural form? The example given was not the first to use a knit / helix structure (and that only a partial) and the article topic wont be the last.

The form accomplishes a lot; Its attractive and stands out from any point of view, it fills structural needs, provides roofing that doesn’t disconnect you from its environment, and allows for pleasant open air access as you travel across it. It will serve as a nice accent to a lot of peoples foot travels.

 
# August 13, 2009 at 22:04
panamArq says:

structurally it is incredibly beautiful! look at the span without any high structure. It would be nice if it was all one color, he can not totally get away from white.

 
# August 13, 2009 at 22:20
md says:

RED is Calgary’s colour (color) – see Stampeder’s Football, Flames Hockey, University of Calgary, and the Canadian Flag – so it seems appropriate – the covered brige glazing is nice too in a brutally cold climate…

 
# August 14, 2009 at 00:53
    DA says:

    well put md.

     
    # September 14, 2009 at 13:49
Gustav Z says:

I agree with panamArq. Very beautiful structure, look at the birdsperspektive, it is soo very vigorous! No pillars and no strings, like a tense muscle.

 
# August 14, 2009 at 02:54
Jade Doel says:

Well Santiago does take inspiration from nature such as the mentioned birds aswell as other things like the human body. When I first saw this bridge I thought it looked like the empty shell of a snake skin…. What do you guys think?
Not that snake skins have much to do with Canada from what I’m aware of.

 
# August 14, 2009 at 07:16

red?

Calatrava is white!

hahahaha

 
# August 14, 2009 at 07:36
chris says:

on the inside you can still see that endless symmetry that is trademark in his work. It looks ver much inspired by something in nature.

 
# August 14, 2009 at 09:11
    toti says:

    I agree. You can see the trademark of Calatravas work in the interiors. But still, the bridge it seems to me, that it have a palpable progress in the whole element. Dunno know if is the best design of this architect however

     
    # August 15, 2009 at 01:01
majchers says:

Cool design in itself but very controversial here in Calgary. Especially considering its surroundings (never mind the cost!). Just does not quite fit in this particular location. Could be build anywhere – and that’s the issue I guess…

 
# August 14, 2009 at 12:28

In light of its controversy (about the budget, design, and approval process), we might want to hold off a bit on reviewing the bridge (of course, if it is built as currently rendered, it should be a.o.k.)!

 
# August 14, 2009 at 14:38
hacksawjim says:

nice design… $26 million worth? i dunno

 
# August 14, 2009 at 15:43
Shelley MacMillan says:

I think the design is wonderful, it meets practical requirements while incorporating Calgary’s colours (and Canada’s) Right up there with Calatrava’s Brookfield Place in Toronto – a soaring masterpiece that I get more attached to year after year. Same will happen with this bridge and the citizens of Calgary. Betcha.

 
# August 14, 2009 at 17:08
Elven says:

I think the guy ran out of ideas…sorry Calatrava R.I.P

 
# August 14, 2009 at 19:00
Twelve says:

I think the guy ran out of ideas 2…sorry Calatrava R.I.P

 
# August 14, 2009 at 22:25
Durban says:

I agree, give me bird wings any day. Calatrava filled a niche market as the crazy organic guy who did stuff youve never seen before. His buildings were pin-ups for people who werent too grown up/jaded/sensible.
But thats not the major problem i have with this design, the reason i dont like it is because it doesnt seem graceful, its just too straight and rigid.

 
# August 15, 2009 at 06:01
salvadore says:

i think that it looks good! for calatrava… anyway, what i dont understand is how is that bridge going to stay there cause without birds the structure looks impossible. i may be wrong cause im not really into engineering but i would like to know how is that possible.

so please someone explain. im curious!

 
# August 15, 2009 at 06:34
majchers says:

Once again gentleman and gentle women – the design is fine, although not new as ‘holz’ above has noticed. The point is that this bridge is very foreign to this particular location in Calgary (you need to now the city) and it simply does not fit here.

 
# August 15, 2009 at 23:06
Kris says:

Calatrava is going downhill, and steep!

 
# August 16, 2009 at 08:18
john says:

CALATRAVA …..MORE BIRD WINGS PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
# August 17, 2009 at 18:50
me says:

in the first perspective, i thought the top parts were solid, cause i don’t think i would like to fry under it….estetically like it a lot….nice to see some color

 
# August 19, 2009 at 14:29
SAKTI says:

i don’t see real calatrava!

 
# August 19, 2009 at 23:16
Emerson Gámez B. says:

parece un gusano. lindo gusano. jajaja. muy bien, excelente. calatrava siempre basa su arquitectura en las formas y estructuras dela naturaleza.

 
# August 21, 2009 at 11:17
John says:

The site had a number of constraints, including a height limit due to a nearby helipad as well as the requirement to not have girders in the riverbed. It’s a very practical and usable design, but is also quite striking. It will be a great addition to Calgary’s improving cityscape.

 
# August 31, 2009 at 10:51
christopher says:

i think that perspective looks great! there is a very tense and somewhat uneasy dynamic at play though…

 
# September 1, 2009 at 02:01
Alex says:

I cant stand birdwings!!! this is stunning!!! and I love the color!!

 
# September 1, 2009 at 16:12
bryante says:

this bridge looks sexy

 
# September 2, 2009 at 10:43
lopez says:

beautiful but does it work?

 
# September 2, 2009 at 10:52
bryante says:

i wanna skateboard across this beauty:)

 
# September 2, 2009 at 10:53
lopez says:

How much would it cost me to built one in my back patio?

 
# September 2, 2009 at 10:54
hector says:

lol i bet u think im sexy to jk jk… But yea nice bride BIG SHOUT OUTS TO JORDAN GREEN!!

 
# September 2, 2009 at 10:56
bryante says:

he should build a bridge for the immigrants to walk the mexico usa border:)

 
# September 2, 2009 at 10:57
majchers says:

See this little bridge:
Railway Footbridge at Roche-sur-Yon
http://www.archdaily.com/38586/in-progress-railway-footbridge-at-roche-sur-yon/

 
# October 27, 2009 at 17:17

Links to this article »

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

love the picts, it has an ethereal quality to it for sure.[+]
From Dusk Till Dawn[+]
David Basulto on Rosa Muerta / Robert Stone:
Why not? If the author wants to decorate it that way, it’s ok. Actually, I...[+]
Haven’t a clue. I was unable to force myself to care enough to finish his novella....[+]
It is good– better than jurgen meyer: simpler...[+]
A pretentious, egotistical blowhard, and in the field of architecture? How utterly...[+]
I fully understand that it is not just about the building. I fully understand the idea,...[+]
I like the stair and the external view I can’t imagine the spaces...[+]
The building is beautiful. But it’s not about the building only… its about...[+]
Stourley Kracklite on 4 Houses / On Office:
I like purism as well as the next guy, so I am very interested in how the...[+]
I like the overall design of it, but in combination with the abandoned dessert location...[+]
I like the yurt argument… yes, it is clearly a client-wooing...[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »