ORDOS 100 #44: Mass Studies
This villa is located in plot #57 of the ORDOS project.
Architects: Mass Studies
Project Team: Minsuk Cho, Kisu Park, Joungwon Lee, Hyunseok Jung, Sanghoon Lee, Cheonkang Park, Joonhee Lee, Kyungmok Park
Location: Ordos, Inner Mongolia, China
Design year: 2008
Construction year: 2009-2010
Curator: Ai Weiwei, Beijing, China
Client: Jiang Yuan Water Engineering Ltd, Inner Mongolia, China
Constructed Area: 1,000 sqm aprox
The desert landscape of Ordos, located in Inner Mongolia, China, is perhaps one place on Earth that is closest in resembling moonscape. It provides a context of vast nothingness, where 100 architects, each design a 1000㎡ villa on a nearly flat, gently undulating dunescape. The master plan of Ordos100 suggests an organic tiling of lots, occupied by a single volume object building, with little regulations and requirements. The freedom of possibilities was inevitable, where architects could keep to the compressed object building or expand that single volume into a plethora of spatial organizations.
Knot House
The Knot House is a site specific and simultaneously autonomous response to its ambiguous and undetermined surroundings. Trapped and huddled by seven other surrounding lots and situated on the highest elevation of the essentially flat terrain, the Knot House takes advantage of the uncertainties of its milieu and also its somewhat unique position. It initially performs as a single residential complex but can be divided into multiple houses or other programs as well. The potential to provide for a variety of possible configurations, as separate parts or as a whole, allows the Knot House to become ambiguous and adaptable, performing as a house or at other times “Not [a] House.”
The cyclical movement of a single-story courtyard house typology was stretched three-dimensionally into a “trefoil knot,” with a continuous linear band of activities. The knot entwines at several points to create a form similar to three rings, each at different levels, interlaced at the center. This arrangement also provides shortcuts to destinations within the house to minimize redundant movements. This configuration presents different paths around the entire house within a complex looping circuit-weaving inside and outside-through different spatial conditions that contain diverse activities.
The continuous knot configuration creates numerous courtyards differing in size and character. Unlike typical enclosures with an inward focus, these multiple courtyards serve not only as extensions of adjacent interior spaces, but also as mediators between the larger developing territory of Ordos and the smaller interior spaces within the house. The courtyards delineated by the knot’s loops are the focal points of interior activities. The program was grouped roughly into three loops: the living/dining loop, the sports/entertainment loop, and the private rooms/support loop. Each of the loops, coupled with its courtyards, varies dramatically: one rests on the ground, the other is underground with water components, and the third is suspended in mid-air. Some of the courtyards feel very open, while others have an almost interior, reclusive quality. It is not immediately apparent how many courtyards are inside the house. One courtyard connects to another, simultaneously flowing in horizontal and vertical directions. The Knot House could be seen as a contemporary adaptation of a “courtyard house,” or futong, in a fluid, three-dimensional form. It is able to be edited and reconfigured for shifting conditions and needs that may result from factors ranging from unforeseen sociopolitical or economic events to the drastic seasonal, climate changes of Ordos.
- courtesy of Mass Studies
- courtesy of Mass Studies
- courtesy of Mass Studies
- courtesy of Mass Studies
- courtesy of Mass Studies
- courtesy of Mass Studies
- courtesy of Mass Studies
- courtesy of Mass Studies
- courtesy of Mass Studies
- site plan
- basement floor plan
- first floor plan
- second floor plan
- third floor plan
- roof plan
- section 01
- section 02
- section 03
- section 04
- section 05
- section 06
- diagrams 01
- diagrams 02
- model © Yong-Kwan Kim
- model © Yong-Kwan Kim
- model © Yong-Kwan Kim































































18 comments »
make a noose for his own neck
whenn are we going to stop building awful bunkers !!! in the name of what ??? !!!
I’m sorry, but I don’t understand. Why is this a “bunker”? It may be a bit brutal, I agree, but it I think it looks like that only because of (I’m guessing intentional) simplicity of their renders. It does have some quite interesting spaces. Spare a second look. It’s not my favorite project, either, but this comment pushed me to respond.
Triple exclamation marks don’t make a good comment. Solid arguments do.
There’s a certain “piling on” that happens on this site in regards to the ORDOS projects. I don’t particularily like this design, it seems like a tedium of circulation for such a small building, but it’s not a nightmare.
Like anything, it’s easier and more fun to rant than to generate a reasoned critique.
I’d have to say, my primary critique of the ORDOS project has less to do with the specific architectural decisions of these individual projects, and more to do with the somewhat blatant presentation of architecture as a class signifier.
Seems this is a project where you can’t tell until it’s built. The site model and section are actually good, and explain the concept well.
The problem seems to be the renderings, where the emphasis on materiality distracts from the overall concept. I wonder what this build would be in brick? The glazing also seems rather simplistic, must it simply follow the circulation? I would think a series of small windows, i.e. something at a different scale from the overall massing, would help here.
What is simple and stupid is to knock this project as a “bunker” and stupid. While the external materiality is almost overpowering here, with not much work this could be an interesting project.
This building will have some stunning interior spaces (sections), but the external … well
Why is it bad? The biggest problem I see with it, is the size. It’s gigantic! But I’d rather see this built over any american McMansion!
ORDOS project requires villas to be 1000sqm.
i think we need a flashlight when i enter the space
I agree that it looks like an overgrown bunker, but I like it because of that. The sections show that there are some interesting spaces and relationships.
100 projects and no one of the architects said SORRY, i am not worthy. Instead some of them TRY and TRY and TRY to design…
…something.
Architecture need honesty.
A simple project will not be GREAT only because ORDOS call you.
THE SCALE OF THIS DESIGN IS REALLY HARD TO UNDERSTAND, THE LOOPING STRUCTURE MAKE IT SEEMINGLY MUCH BIGGER INSTEAD OF BREAKING THE SCALE DOWN, THE VIEWS OF THOSE INTERIOR COURTS LOOKS LIKE THE SCALE OF A 6/7 STORIES UNIVERSITY OR OFFICE BLDG
that’s freakin’ huge. really too many stairs. it’s like an Escher project. so much circulation space, that all you do is walk around in your own home? what if you break a leg or have a buggy for your kids?
I liked much, it’s a bit like a labyrinth, or a castle… There is a cool ludic dimension. Circulation space is not necessarily a bad thing, in this case lots of things seem to happen there, by looking at the sections. Very nice project!
LIKE THE CONCEPT, BUT SPACES HAVE NO PROPORTION…
how are those sections made?
S K E T C H U P
It takes no consideration to its surroundings, even though that is somewhat of the idea behind it. In the description it talks of vast nothingness, but in the renders its showing bright green grass growing. Not only in the project but around it. Weak project overall, more so the concept. A nice idea of creating flow of space, but fails in its realization of the concept.