Architects: Willy Müller Architects
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Principal in Charge: Willy Müller
Associate Architect: Frédéric Guillaud
Project Team: Francisco Villeda, Isabella Pintani, Simona Assiero Brá, Mariano Arias-Diez
Collaborators: Iris Cantante, Bruno Louzada, Edgardo Arroyo, Claudia Barata, Bart Hooijen, Katrine Kunstz
Rendering: Lucas Capelli, Julia Morgado, Daniel Corsi
Model: ARRK,s.l., Fabio Castelblanco, Fabian Asunción
Structure Consultant: SBP, Schlaich Bergermann und partner
Engineering Consultant: GEPRO engineering
Model Photographs: Adria Goula Sarda
Buildings that represent social groups, religions or specific moments in human history should be from a typological point of view -and not only aesthetical- different from already defined typologies which are functionally concrete and abstract, like seen in banks and large corporation office towers that are populating the skyline of every important city today.
These buildings should be capable of becoming global and international icons, and at the same time objects of an extraordinary beauty that can last for several years. In this terms we think that the O.I.C Headquarters building, would, could and should be a singular project, not only for the place where its stands, but for the people that it represents around the world.
The Cupola then is taken as visible and powerful icon from the vast and rich culture and history of Islamic architecture, appearing since long ago and in very different points of the world but always under the same common identity. An architectural element that has always been reason of defiant construction solutions, technological and scientific breakthroughs, throughout human history.
To construct a monumental Cupola, where the 5 “pillars” that support it transform into buildings themselves. It will be a new technical challenge, that not only summarizes a functional program with a formal reference, but will be a demonstration of vanguard with tradition, of risk and faith, and of singular ideas against a globalized understanding, simultaneously.
The shape of the building is a meditated typological decision. Each one of its “limbs”, represented in an orbital ring that like any alliance symbolizes the union of Muslim nations under one common cupola, define the functional and inside spaces. Even more important that the building itself is the monumental plaza, confining and opening like a gateway the sense and purpose of the project, and a great covered Garden, ancestral and renewed at the same time, a place of contemplation where we can see the city, the sea and the mountains.
The presence of this building is reinforced by the abstract image of its structural skin made by steel, glass and concrete, in contrast with mirrors of water that multiply the visual, formal and aesthetical aspects, and by the subtleness of the interior garden that behind a structural mesh, embraces a delicate and peaceful space where the most important buildings of the program are located: The Plenary Hall and the Secretary General, in accordance with the character that these two entities should evoke: leadership and popular representation.
The final shape, slightly asymmetric or in movement, the oval plaza and the “towers” that conforms it, the general “Orbits” that this project proposes, suggests an actual vision of this ancient culture, proud and live, that demands its place and part in our modern globalized world.
Jeddah has successfully combined the dignity and traditions of the past with the dynamism of the contemporary world. It also is the most important port and the entrance door of the pilgrimage.
This building should also be a perdurable and timeless icon of that identity: “port and door”, a place to pass through learning the historical background and at the same time building the present.
A deep meaning equal to the activities of the OIC, which finds in Jeddah a city that renews its compromise with itself but at the same time offers its singularity to the world. We propose a building that interacts between two scales: the Islamic world and the city of Jeddah.
A part of the program can be used simultaneously by both entities, the program dedicated to the Congress areas and Plenary halls of the OIC has been designed with maximum controlled accessibility so that the city could use and get benefit from the building for special events if desired, optimizing to the maximum the investment in such item of infrastructure.
Circular shapes in answer to the main flows, organize the level of main accesses in order to have control over the user immediately upon entering, and from here, be able to orientate each one of them to its level of preference or work.
The rest of this level will accommodate the equipments needed to satisfy the program and some city needs that require special autonomous functionality: the library, banks, shops, etc.
In the office levels, approximately 30% has been reserved for a future expansion of the OIC needs and programs, but also we present the option for them to be used as external offices to the complex, therefore, this offices are located in the lower levels of each tower, closest to the main control and accesses.
At level 7, the office program comes together to form a “horse shoe” platform from tower 2 to tower 5 that contains the whole area designated to Directors of the different departments, a hierarchical organization that serves a strategic purpose, to group all of them for communication and in to have a direct relation with the Secretary General. The entire tower 1, from the VIP reception hall to the Conference Garden, can be used as par of the public relations program related with the exterior. For the O.I.C in its plenary meetings and activities in general, as well as for the city of Jeddah in events like the Economical Forum for instance. This tower is related directly with tower 5, sharing accesses to VIP parking space, where the mobility would be restricted and exclusive for the Secretary General and its staff all the way up to its office space at the Conference Garden.
Finally in the Main access hall level we dedicate a part of this surface to add a new program, which for us, summarizes one of the basics intentions of this building: we create a museum of Islamic Architecture, an infrastructure good for the world and the O.I.C, as well as for the city of Jeddah, to honor and celebrate the architects of Islamic History.









































why do we need to see this? Hideous!
Beautiful. Potentially.
I don’t see any potential for beauty here. Perhaps there will be a nice space withing the conference garden but otherwise this is a horrible design.
Blobs need to go out of style…the sooner the better.
Disgusting object blob. Horrendous.
what is it about it that’s hideous?
why is every single comment on here about what they feel is beautiful or ugly? I question whether that should be relevant as a critique, given that it is obviously beautiful to some, ugly to others.
The ugliest building ever designed by an architect.
Assuming this was done by an architect… (I wouldn’t be so sure.)
Bloody Disgusting! A disgrace to the field of Architecture!
why do people keep doing things like this? It’s truly hideous. And not only hideous, not interesting. You can see in the section that is has no spatial richness at all.
And worse than that, it is pretentious.
This building hardly fits into the canon of blob architecture as many have said. It has an extremely clear logic and follows the form of the cupola while making reference to themes in islamic architecture. Personally, I find the geometry pretty convincing. The plaza seems to me rather a sensible and pleasant thing to build in the middle of Jeddah.
Overall this is rather an open scheme for a public building. For example, here the plenary hall sits atop a transparent dome that ought to be visible from many points in the city. This contrasts to other built spaces I can think of with similar functions, such as the general assembly of the United Nations. By comparison that space, while expressive is absolutely inward facing. My guess is that if this is being built it will end up an icon and a relevant symbol of cooperation for the OIC.
The comparisons I would draw are to 30 St. Mary Axe or the Reichstag project of Norman Foster, both highly successful.
Terry Glenn Phipps
http://web.me.com/tgphipps
Thank you for being the one person i’ve read whose made any sense, I agree wholeheartly with you.
I love how the section doesn’t tell you anything interesting about the building. They pretty much cut the offices off at the crotch of the blob and turned it into an atrium. THAT must have taken an assload of planning.
What next?
Another mental diarrhea!! This project resumes the quality of OMA….really really poor…
Sorry!!!i said OMA but i ment WMA!!Althoug OMA sometimes (many)isn´t too far away from this….
people are funny, calling this a “blob” and being angry at it only because of exterior aesthetics.
c’mon now!
i think its beautiful.arabian’s dome is being redefined here.it creates majestic plaza underneath.& alotta green on top.solid & void r mixed in harmony.
Interior is good: gardens etc., but exterior is smth strange and poor. I don-t like this project
Is that a real construction photo (first row, middle) or a rendering?
a bit strange form at this architecture
Absolutely Beautiful. We’re no longer limited to buildings as boxes.