Green Incubator / Plus Three Architecture

© Available Light Photographic Studios

Architects: Plus Three Architecture
Location: , UK
Project Year: 2012
Photographs: Steve Mayes, Available Light Photographic Studios

Project Area: 3,085 sqm
Structural Engineer: Capita Symonds
Services Engineer: RPS Gregory
Ecologist: E3 Ecology

One Trinity Green is a new, high-tech business centre for SMEs in the renewables sector. Forming Phase 1 of the Trinity South development in South Shields, the scheme redevelops and regenerates a brownfield site formerly occupied by an electronics factory which was one of the major employers in the town.

© Available Light Photographic Studios

The building is conceived as 3 contemporary, flexible, ‘Victorian’ warehouses each with a distinctive character but bound together by a singular ribbon of elevation and a range of shared social spaces. An elevated roof garden provides further amenity and further differentiates One Trinity Green from other similar ‘incubator’ developments.

© Steve Mayes

Each ‘warehouse’ benefits from exposed structure (for passive cooling), opening windows and a central winter garden (to aid cross ventilation) and a robust palette of materials (to minimise damage during tenant churn).

© Steve Mayes

The design concept seeks to address the social issues of multi-occupancy buildings by creating a clustered arrangement of studios and hybrid units and through the celebration of circulation space as a social amenity and interaction space.

© Steve Mayes

Completed in May 2012, One Trinity Green is one of the first in the region to achieve a BREEAM ‘Outstanding’ rating through a combination of simple, passive environmental techniques allied to a large array of roof-mounted, photovoltaic panels. The pre-construction BREEAM score was measured at 87.7%.

Elevation

View this project in Google Maps

* Location to be used only as a reference. It could indicate city/country but not exact address.
Cite: "Green Incubator / Plus Three Architecture" 22 Aug 2012. ArchDaily. Accessed 25 Jul 2014. <http://www.archdaily.com/?p=265303>

0 comments

Share your thoughts