Visit our Products section to learn more about architectural products.

Za’abeel Park Observation Tower / XTEN Architecture

By Sebastian J — Filed under: Competitions , ,
 

Our friends from XTEN Architecture shared with us their entry to the ThyssenKrupp elevator competition in Dubai. The observation tower is located in a cultural park just off axis from the main skyscraper boulevard in Dubai, Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Road.

More images and architect’s description after the break.

I. Site Strategy

The site plan for the Za’abeel Park Observation (ZPO) Tower is organized according to a traditional Islamic geometric pattern found in the regions’ decorative arts. At the scale of the plaza, this pattern takes the form of the granite paving, lines of grass, flowers and trees, and a ribbon of water that draws one in and through the base of the ZPO Tower. This same pattern at a larger scale delineates four distinct landforms around the base of the tower, creating different pathways and approaches to the base as well as providing required program spaces for parking, conference center, children’s library and service areas. A flexible conference center for one hundred persons is located along a pathway to the North of the tower, with access to the lake, Za’abeel Park and a garage located within a second landform. A Children’s Library is located in a smaller landform adjacent to the main tower entry, and a fourth landform shielding the site from highway traffic is provided for mechanical and service spaces.

The Islamic pattern is rendered in different grasses and plantings at a larger scale over these landforms, with the intention that they are accessible for the public to climb upon and to sit to watch the crowds or the lights of the tower above. The landforms serve to both frame and guide the activity around the entry points to the tower and also to create a gradual transition between the scale of the ZPO Tower and the larger Za’abeel Park as it extends to the North and West.

II. Environmental

The intention is for the ZPO Tower to be built as a net zero energy tower. Several hundred square meters of thin film photovoltaic solar will clad the horizontal planes of the upper petal roofs and the Southern, Western and Eastern exposures of the tower. The main program areas are located beneath landforms with green roofs to reduce solar gain. Geothermal cooling and ventilation will serve these program areas. All the water used on the site will be recycled, and the majority of the building materials will come from recycled sources. Estimates are that the solar energy alone will generate enough electricity to illuminate and power the building.

III. Observation Tower

The ZPO Tower has been developed in plan, sections and elevation with reference to both the Islamic pattern developed in the site planning and the geometric qualities of certain desert flowers native to the region. There are six tubes set in a 30m diameter, with three inner tubes and three outer tubes. The inner tubes comprise the circulation system for the tower; one containing the elevators, one containing an open stair and one containing an enclosed, fire-rated emergency egress stair. These three inner tubes are shaped according to their function and also to provide lateral structural support for the dynamic configuration of the three outer tubes.ഊThe three outer tubes are articulated to describe a 270-degree rotation around an invisible cylinder defined by the original Islamic pattern. At the base the tubes open and expand into “petals” of open air steel structure with a continuous cladding of monocrystalline solar panels at the Southern and Western exposures. As the three outer tubes rise they begin to open and expand into larger petals that cantilever out 70m in each direction at the top of the tower. Inside these upper petals are dramatic spaces that contain a café and six interconnected indoor and outdoor observation deck areas on two levels.

The structure of this tower is comprised of a steel diagrid system, interlaced with additional steel members that follow the lines from the pattern at plaza level of the site. The intention is that the structural pattern, derived from traditional Islamic patterns, becomes the expression of the ZPO Tower. At times this structural pattern may be more open as building loads are dispersed, and at times they may be so dense that they resemble the traditional mashrabiyya screens found in the regional architecture. This braced frame structure is laterally reinforced every 30m by horizontal diaphragms connecting between three and six tubes in any one instance.

At the base and top transitions bent moment frames support the horizontal diaphragms. The geometric organization of the tower results in a form that naturally sheds wind and allows it to pass through and around the aerodynamic upper forms. An 8m diameter wind dampening mass is located at the center of the upper tower to further compensate for any wind loads. The petals at the top of the tower are oriented towards specific views and directions that resonate with both the past and future of Dubai. The first petal is aligned with Mecca, to the Southwest of the project site. Moving clockwise at the top of the ZPO Tower, the second petal is directed toward the old town of Deira, a neighborhood of traditional souks, mosques, old fortress walls and wind towers. From the observation deck in the third petal of the tower one surveys the changing skyline along Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Road.

 

41 comments »

Nick says:

OMG
What is actually going on in te body of the tower?
Is this just a platform to have a great view over the city of Dubai??
There are towers enough to have that view…

What a waste of steel

 
# June 6, 2009 at 12:13
Balkan says:

Looks like a bunch of golf sticks without a golfbag and a caddy.:))))
waste of money

 
# June 6, 2009 at 13:22
2MACoff says:

XTEN – X MEN ПИЗДАТЕНЬКО…

 
# June 6, 2009 at 13:25

Nick, this project is for a competition FOR an observation tower.
Balkan, please judge the project on how well it fits the program, not what it resembles. Actually read the text before bashing it.
This project is beautifully diagrammed, and I think it should definitely be built.

 
# June 6, 2009 at 14:01
Lucas Gray says:

A little bizarre and definitely a useless object but something about it is attractive and playful.

 
# June 6, 2009 at 14:10
16:08:78 says:

!!!!ARCH GONE WILD!!!

 
# June 6, 2009 at 14:14
Balkan says:

Troy, first of all I said what was my first impresion when I saw the building and I wrote on what reminds me this structure. Second do you think it is necessary and rational to build something so expensive but useless, mostly for sightseeing? no mater how beautifull it is diagramed?
Unfortunatelly nowdays good presentation can sell a lot of bad stuff.

 
# June 6, 2009 at 14:24
theCHAVACANO says:

Dubai just a playground for architects with insane $$$ to spend, anyone is envy haha

 
# June 6, 2009 at 14:24
topher says:

Just because we can doesn’t necessarily mean we should…use control, and stop thinking with your egos

 
# June 6, 2009 at 15:12
Nick says:

Pfff, owkay than, it’s the competition which is useless, not the tower. pfff
It just gives me headaches… put the money in green economy or whatever.
But no, they happen to be are petrol sjeiks.

 
# June 6, 2009 at 15:22
Andrew says:

You guys are right we shouldn’t waste our time on frivolities and expensive things that have no meaning. Richard Serra is the greatest offender of wasting steel! Jeff Koons should be ashamed of himself too. While we’re at it, we’ll stop wasting valuable paper resources on fictional novels. Such ego.

 
# June 6, 2009 at 16:24
victor says:

it looks like they do not know what to do with their money, i should not be surprised of such “cool design”.It is only a vivid reflect of the palm trees around it.. according with the film Home (Free to everyone to watch in youtube and everywhere pretty much), it says that solar panels are not used in Dubai!!
what a shame!
if we judge it as for competition, i will say it is no more than the cool kid on class doing something with no context, solid concept and why so high?
if you want an observation tower go at the rooftop of any building over there…
hope for the best

 
# June 6, 2009 at 17:12
JuanLuisBurke says:

With all due respect, somebody should tell the Arabian petrol sheiks that wasting money and resources is just not so hip anymore. Imagine if they put their money into developing clean energy, developing industries and infrastructure for their countries for the day their oil runs out, for example.

 
# June 6, 2009 at 18:20
John says:

if you want to see something really awful – google the actual winners of this competition. I was actually silly enough to submit an entry for this competition and I would of been much happier to see this as a winner.

 
# June 6, 2009 at 19:37
michael says:

I don’t think the sheiks are into hipness…. they do what they want to what ever they want….. have you driven over there? i had a number 5 plate almost bash me, and isn’t there a video of a sheik torturing a guy by running him over, slowly. Oh back to the hipness thing… the robes….. yeah, I typed it. I personally wish as architects we would just ignore all competitions and projects….I feel whorish when i see the architecture profession trying to get their design jollies off. the architecture junk yard is too easy to compare… it’s a lack of….. i dunno ….giving a crap that unleashes these projects, that then the marketing hounds are forced to turn into real architecture I for one are tired and wish architecture would find it’s feet again.

 
# June 6, 2009 at 19:39
Chris says:

It’s a bit excessive isn’t it. Doesn’t have any real relevance and is OTT. Also its a series of tubes, lol.

 
# June 6, 2009 at 21:27
CMO ARCH says:

I’m sorry, am I missing something, how are these tubes rotating? These drawings don’t provide enough information. Secondly, this tower will never be built because Dubai is going bankrupt. And third, don’t you all just find this to be hideous?

 
# June 6, 2009 at 21:58
HamLëT says:

hi there….i agree with you guys…DUBAI it’s only a waste of money…mmm achitectural ego demonstration…we can’t taste any project because you maybe feel strange to be in a complex that contains ZAHA, OMA, GEHRY, and all the archistars…

but i disagree with balkan and nick…you guys can’t be saying that stuff about this kind of projects…did you understand the project or the architecture in the actual world…we’re not in the age of FLW or Minimalism, we are in Evo….to response the demands of the new society…i want to know how you develop your architecture…i’m sure that you take all your magazines…and copy the living room, the kitchen, and that common issues to show your “contemporary sense of architecture” but your spaces are full of useless ideas…like a sell houses catalogue.

Please don’t be a shame to us, and write something intelligent…not if the project reminds me a golf bag!!!

in my opinion this firm is worried about the new tendences, and how to apply in different matters, between the concept, materials and constructive methods…and…i only have to said: i like it…not the location…but…whatever…i’ll hope to see more of this architecture on this website…and why not…some of this virtual buildings in the city

 
# June 6, 2009 at 22:51
HamLëT says:

by the way, here’s a fragment of XTEN profile:

“XTEN has developed a distinctive method to the development of contemporary architecture, with an emphasis on open spatial configurations, material transformation and refined detailing and craftsmanship. Underlying themes in the work have focused on the conceptual use of building elements, modified with both traditional and digital techniques.”

 
# June 6, 2009 at 22:54
ryuri69 says:

i agree with nbk and balkan…it’s just a waste a money and steel

 
# June 7, 2009 at 00:22
ryuri69 says:

a waste ofmoney and steel

 
# June 7, 2009 at 00:23
Durban says:

I agree with Hamlet. Its too easy to get on the practicality train and argue against wasting materials or crazy forms. But expressive creativity is also part of being human.
…Thats the thing with Zaha and gehry, its only architects who complain about embodied energy and titanium cladding, everybody else thinks their buildings are cool, same story here.

 
# June 7, 2009 at 04:09
aufi says:

im kind of a noob here…
for this kind of form and rendering what software suits best to construct such a model..
trying to learn here
im a student

 
# June 7, 2009 at 04:59
Rafa says:

I think that I will stand in the middle of both extremes; I opine that the architecture itself is very cool in it’s study of form & structure. I can’t say that it’s a pivotal piece of architecture in the history of the art but it does deserve some merit for it’s concept and experimentation.

In it’s context, however, the idea is quite ridiculous and impractical. The tower is only 170m (±550ft) tall and you are supposed to see what? Sand and the bellies of the surrounding buildings of which 48 are over 600 ft tall. The one image of the tower overlooking the Emirates Office Tower is waaaaaay out of scale because that building is +1100 ft tall.

Well, you can’t necessarily blame the architects since they, like the rest of us, are whores that will do anything they are paid for. So, they got paid and went along with the program which leads me to these questions. Are we, as designers of the world, morally responsible for informing our clients about what we should and should not build because of it’s impact on the earth, and society at large? Or do we just want to get paid?

 
# June 7, 2009 at 21:14
Jon says:

I don’t know. There’s a lot of talk about the structure of the building, but not much on its actual use (or even relevance for that matter!) It’s real easy to use a lot of flowery words to sell a project, but frankly, there’s not much to this project. The diagrams make sense for how it may have been conceived as a form, but plopping a few cut-outs of sheiks walking through a rendered image is anything a Studio 1 student can pull off in the 30 minutes before presentation time!

Frankly, we need to start thinking less about the diagrammatic logic of a form, and more about its particular relevance to time and place (as well as its future resonance)

 
# June 8, 2009 at 07:26
patentpolice says:

Stand up, cross your legs, bring your hands up and sing “Walk Like an Eqyptian.” You get the idea.

 
# June 8, 2009 at 10:21
Wyatt O'Day says:

http://www.thyssenkrupp-elevator-architecture.com/proyectos_09.aspx here are the winners and I seriously cannot believe the 1st prize proposal. Looks like they could have done that in 10 min with a couple of sticks and some photoshop work… This design shown here is WAY more interesting. But all in all, a very uninteresting competition.

 
# June 8, 2009 at 17:19
Travis says:

the perfect vantage for observing wild architectural beasts roaming about the desert…

 
# June 8, 2009 at 21:25
Elodie says:

This project do polemic!!! Is ti an observation for wild or city?? Maybe the city is the wild… Hum I understand now ^^ Welcome in Dubaï!

 
# June 10, 2009 at 03:58
ariel says:

Balkan….

“Second do you think it is necessary and rational to build something so expensive but useless, mostly for sightseeing? no mater how beautifull it is diagramed?”

and why the umankind keeps useles painted pieces of textile in expensieve buildings, andpay foir these things (paints) so much millons?

the answer its in the philosophy path….. i will give u a tip : ART, and its part of the human nature…

 
# June 11, 2009 at 22:06
TheCHAVACANO says:

This is a reflect of their culture, as any cultural and artistic expresion is a reflect of the time and space where is done, Arabs is about how much you have, how much you can buy, how much you can spend, how many camels, how many women (sorry for this but is how the way it was) how many pointless structures you can build in your city, is about power. So this “architecture” reflects their point of view, that’s it.

 
# June 12, 2009 at 14:25

Links to this article »

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

It is good– better than jurgen meyer: simpler...[+]
A pretentious, egotistical blowhard, and in the field of architecture? How utterly...[+]
I fully understand that it is not just about the building. I fully understand the idea,...[+]
I like the stair and the external view I can’t imagine the spaces...[+]
The building is beautiful. But it’s not about the building only… its about...[+]
Stourley Kracklite on 4 Houses / On Office:
I like purism as well as the next guy, so I am very interested in how the...[+]
I like the overall design of it, but in combination with the abandoned dessert location...[+]
I like the yurt argument… yes, it is clearly a client-wooing...[+]
Don’t ask… you’ll just get some lengthy BS answer.[+]
Yes, this is clearly a yourt inspiration :rollseyes:[+]
I like this building … but the pretentious,kitchy heart? …why?[+]
I like the project… a lot. Reading the description, however, makes me want to...[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »