ArchDaily | Broadcasting Architecture Worldwidethe world's most visited architecture website
i

Sign up now and start saving and organizing your favorite architecture projects and photos

i

Find the most inspiring products for your projects in our Product Catalog.

i

Get the ArchDaily Chrome Extension and be inspired with every new tab. Install here »

All
Projects
Products
Events
Competitions
  1. ArchDaily
  2. Projects
  3. Houses
  4. United States
  5. Standard
  6. Tree house / Standard

Tree house / Standard

  • 01:00 - 10 May, 2009
Tree house / Standard
Tree house / Standard

Tree house / Standard Tree house / Standard Tree house / Standard Tree house / Standard +13

From the architect. L.A. based practice Standard sent us this 167 sqm concrete and wood passive solar house on the top of a hillside in Los Angeles.

This house responds to its site and the city through its transparent southern exposure. A large ash tree literally envelopes the house, creating a microclimate to which the project responds. The house employs passive solar design and other low tech methods of climate control even as the open south elevation allows panoramic views of the Los Angeles basin. A partially concealed post and beam structure modulates the exterior and allows openings to span from floor to ceiling. 

The second floor bears on thin stainless steel columns and cantilevers over a concrete deck, which in turn cantilevers over the slope. The horizontal layering of the roof and floors extends the interior and engages the space under the tree. The strong horizontal projections also provide visual balance to the immense trunk and limbs. Redwood siding clads the overhangs and defines the transition between the inside and out.

The horizontal layering of the roof and floors extends the interior and engages the space under the tree. The strong horizontal projections also provide visual balance to the immense trunk and limbs. Redwood siding clads the overhangs and defines the transition between the inside and out.

All photographs by Benny Chan

Cite: "Tree house / Standard" 10 May 2009. ArchDaily. Accessed . <http://www.archdaily.com/21616/tree-house-standard/>
Read comments

14 Comments

Vivi Seixas · June 01, 2011

Tree house / Standard | ArchDaily http://t.co/YhfnzvO via @archdaily

sunny · September 29, 2009

I think just tree in front of the house shouldn't call tree house...

acuo · August 24, 2009

good....

md · August 22, 2009

there is no god...

Ganja Man · July 03, 2009

I just added you to my Google News Reader. Keep up the good work. Look forward to reading more from you in the future.

Poncio · May 13, 2009

boring i think....

Bo Lucky · May 12, 2009

A single tree located way too close to the building does not make a "tree house". I wonder how long it will survive in its new environment? There is something wrong with the house itself too. Awkward proportions, building materials don't seem to coexist harmoniously, poorly designed lighting and this main entrance through the dining area? I don't like this house at all...

Marcus · May 12, 2009

This project is ok. It could've been weay better.

Brian K · May 11, 2009

Many of the details and/or lighting aspects could have been poor decisions made by a contractor and/or the owner, in an effort to save money.

Michael Nash · May 11, 2009

TGP, THANK you for the comment about the lighting. I've been saying the same thing for years.

Recessed can lights are the most abused and misunderstood tool in current lighting trends, and I too miss the indirect/ambient (often fluorescent) light designed into the space by midcentury architects. The same principles can be executed with better technology these days.

Lasse · May 11, 2009

Tree or no tree the house IS a house like many others.. Enough with the weak-folds-projects! Dear associates, please step up!!

malgorzata · May 11, 2009

Although the tree is not very beautiful, without it that house would be like many others, nothing particular.

BS · May 11, 2009

I agree, I think the detailing could make this so much more special (maybe dramatic?) This is bland for such a nice connection to the site.

Terry Glenn Phipps · May 11, 2009

This wants to be a great project and it squarely into the canon of California modernism. However, the details are really devilish. I just cannot escape the strong Home Depot hottub vibe of the wood cladding across the back of the living room. I might expect to see that in some Topanga canyon ganja junkies den but not in a house with these aspirations.

Likewise, the lighting solution is just abysmal and illogical. These ceiling cans just reek of DIY hardware store detailing. It puzzles me that architecture with environmental aspirations ignores lighting as a source of savings and visual poetry. Southern California architects were already doing beautiful things with fluorescent lighting (admittedly not a perfect environmental technology) in the 1930s. Why not skip the $9,000.00 Eames sofa an invest in decent lighting?

Terry Glenn Phipps

···

Comments are closed

Read comments