OMA wins competition for the Taipei Performing Arts Centre

After a two-phase international competition (with offices such as Morphosis, Abalos+Sentkiewicz, MVRDV and Zaha Hadid), has been awarded the first prize in the design competition to build the new Performing Arts Centre.

The project, led by Rem Koolhaas and Ole Scheeren, is based on 3 theaters (1 x 1,500 seats – the round one, 2 x 800 seats – cubes) which are plugged into a central cube cladded with corrugated glass. This scheme puts all the stage accommodations of the 3 theaters into the central cube, allowing for more flexibility as theaters can be used independently or combined, expanding the possibilities for experimental performances – an art which is very strong on the country. This new arrangement of stage and seatings includes a public circulation that exposes parts of the backstage to the public.

And now, my comments on the form.

I know that some of you will freak out with this, but if you have been to Taipei you´ll know that the local architecture is very figurative (ie: Taipei 101 as a bamboo stick/pagoda), so I think that this potent geometrical shapes we see on the models are the result of that, adapting to the local culture.

Also, this new disposal of the service/to-be-served spaces on a “theatrical” configuration brings to my mind the Seattle Public Library and how it changed the typical library approach, resulting on a new experience.

But still, it doesn´t blow my mind as other OMA projects have done in the past. Or am I missing something?

Cite: Basulto, David. "OMA wins competition for the Taipei Performing Arts Centre" 27 Jan 2009. ArchDaily. Accessed 31 Oct 2014. <http://www.archdaily.com/?p=12728>
  • Astor

    You are not missing something. this project is awful.

  • Mark

    Not only awful, but looks severely dated.

  • Chris

    It’s an awesome project.

  • RS

    It’s ugly.

  • flip

    a run down from previous works..

  • http://www.archdaily.com David Basulto

    actually, i´m eager to see the section of this project. i think it would tell us a lot. i´ll try to get it.

  • sinse

    It finally happened… OMA’s principal has gone senile.

  • http://none gm

    I think we need more information on the project to make a judgement, afterall it should never be about form otherwise neil denari or zaha hadid would have won.

    It would also be nice to see the other entries and some information on them to speculate on the judging of the design; where there other factors that informed the decision to chose OMA’s design? It would be interesting to know.

    • http://www.yahoo.com/ Cash

      bzgoZI In awe of that answer! Really cool!

  • http://full-speed.org/ Scott Johnson

    The shape of this building reminds me of OMA’s work in Dallas: http://www.arcspace.com/architects/koolhaas/wyly_theater/wyly_theater.html

  • http://www.francescomoncada.com francesco

    oma come back!
    congratulations guys!is very nice!

  • scarpasez

    Yikes. Is that globe supposed to be the wrecking ball?

  • Carlo

    i like it, of course we would need more drawings and images, but it reminds me the amazing project for the bibliotheque nationale in paris, that didnt win at the end. i’ m sure they are referring to that particular design and that OMA will develop the same idea further.
    the night visual however is awful. but i love the side view of the maquette model. its fasinating!

  • http://www.raum.carbonmade.com rangga umbas

    yes i think we need to see the plan and section first. i think koolhaas must have some surprises

  • Carlo

    http://konyvtarepiteszet.klog.hu/?p=176

    the above mentioned library project of OMA

  • Mark

    For me, the genius of OMA’s TRÈS GRANDE BIBLIOTHÈQUE was that volumes were formed by a reductive gesture. Yet other Rem projects use an additive method (Jersey City), but this project seems to be torn between the two methods with a confusing and awkward result. The TGB competition was also held 10 years ago- maybe it’s time to move on…
    The basic cuboid volume is very similar to the Wyly Theatre, I agree with Scott, and one addition to this may have worked, but not all of them. Would definitely welcome further material (and design development).

    • Bopp

      based on this material it is not possible to compare it with the wyly theatre. Not even when you only look at form, not close.

  • http://gwarchitects.co.za Jason

    The model has something, but I am not convinced . . . . . . . .

  • utopian robot

    This reminds me of Rem’s early work and also archigram’s plug in city, and of course even venturi scott brown w/ that large exterior monitor. But I have to wonder, if built, what will be the fate of this building in fifty years? Is there a predicted life span before it’s totally demolished?

  • what-a-curse

    wow, this is horrendous. I can’t believe someone can actually come up with this after all the good (and bad) things that are being done nowadays.

  • manix

    it would ‘ve been nicer to have some more drawings.. still good… nice one

  • Paul

    As a Taiwanese I think it fits the urban context in Taiwan.
    Mix, flexibility, and not necessary beautiful in someway.
    I also look forward to see the section.

  • taipei

    sucks!

  • brooklyn

    i think the entry is really queer,even though it does fit the context arround, but it doesn’t mean it’s part of the nightmarket.
    imagine you stroll along the streets and suddenly enter the performing arts centre of taipei, isn’t that really strage?

  • http://www.odris.blogspot.com odris

    just great project

  • Pausanias

    I think I’m gonna be sick.

  • celine

    This is what architecture should always be. It makes me dream.

  • john

    When An office copies his own style, it s stupid,,,for example: Frank Gehry ,,,,In this case it s even more horrible,,,because OMA makes a very bad remake of it s own style in a very superficial way,,,There is no innovation,,,,no contextualization and no poesy….there maye be some formal radicalism,,,,SO this building is shity,,,just like most of the new projects of OMA,,,,,

    At list the comments are interresting

  • http://www.humanrepublic.ca RY

    this is just as bad as our OCAD building here in toronto… but the world is filled with ugly things and people just eat it up. go figure.

  • brandon pass

    clown noses in architecture are SOOOOOOOOOO 80′s

  • Chris

    Count the number of responses so far…Everyone wants to talk about it. Other projects don’t generate this kind of chatter.

  • http://www.ocaarquitetos.arq.br eron

    the elevation looks like krusty the clown by simpsons! very ugly!