It has been 20 years since Professor Carlos Sambricio proposed the idea of recovering, within the Spanish landscape, what we wish to call "the secondary figures"—those architects who, for various reasons, did not enjoy significant critical success during their professional practice, but whose work, when revisited in light of the years that have passed, raises issues of interest to us today.
Certainly, the memory of those works—this time with the focus broadened both within and outside our country—is necessary to understand, in its full extent, the professional fabric required to give rise to the masterpieces of modern architecture,
