In this issue of ARQ, the heterogeneous and incoherent nature of "imaginaries" is presented in its full breadth. The house by Fake Industries Architectural Agonism and Aixopluc, the pedagogical proposal by Beals Lyon, the projects by Hevia and Urzúa, the house by Alarcón, and the research by Soffia all explore the concept of the imaginary as a collection of references. The review of existing imaginaries and their impact on how we understand the city, the territory, or even the market, is addressed in the texts by Encinas and Tironi, Méndez and Ramírez, as well as in the work of Peliowski. Meanwhile, the creation of new imaginaries is explored in the text by Valenzuela and in the proposals by Ferrando and Tudor, Brandlhuber+ Emde and Burlon, Izquierdo, Pérez, and Arancibia and Casals. Finally, the discovery of those imaginaries that remain hidden in plain sight is analyzed in the interviews with Metahaven and Lambert, as well as in the text by Alonso and Palmarola.
