Island House / IROJE KHM Architects

Oct 2009

Uploaded by Nico Saieh — Filed under: Featured ,Houses ,Selected , Concrete, IROJE KHM Architects, Korea

▼

Add this to My Bookmarks:

share by email

share by email

Architect : HyoMan Kim – IROJE KHM Architects
Location : Gapyunggun, Gyeounggi-do, Korea
Design team : SuMi Jung, JungMin Oh, ARum Kim, SunHee Kim
Structure designer : MOA. SungYeong Oh
Lighting designer : LITEWORK, Seoda
Furniture designer : HeeSu Hong – Seoda
Contractor : JEHYO
Site area : 872.63 sqm
Bldg. area : 337.33 sqm
Gross floor area : 628.02 sqm
Photographer : JongOh Kim

Floating site on the river

This site, where is floating on river and confronted the graceful landscape, was strongly recognized to me as a part of nature, from the first time that I met.

From then, I started to visualize “the architectural nature” as a place of recreation.

Form of site = Form of architecture = Maximum efficiency of landuse

While maximizing the efficiency of landuse, the leaner concrete mass, that cherishes the courtyard where is filled with the water and the greenery, was laid out on this site along the irregular formed site line.

site plan

This courtyard is “The architectural nature” and a central recreation space as extended river that communicate the river and architecture.

Continuous circulation of stepped roof garden – Creation of new green land in this site

The whole part of the step typed roofs, where is moving upward with various level, are directly linked to the bed rooms in upper floor.
Finally, this stepped roof gardens are linked to both sides of the inner court at where swimming pool is.

The inner court where is filled with the water and flower and fruit, and the whole of the roof gardens are circulated as the continuous landscape place and that is the place as “architectural nature” in concept.

Sucking in dynamic-surrounding landscape

Naturally, all of the rooms inside this site-shaped-mass are laid toward the picturesque landscape to enjoy the graceful scenery surrounded this site.

The huge panoramic view framed with sloped ceiling line that is composed with the lines of stepped roof gardens and the bottom line of the inner court, is the major impression of inner space of this house.

Promenade inner space of skipfloor made the promenade roofgarden-space of skipfloor.

section 01

Skip floor plan of inside of this house produced various dramatic spaces.

Floating boxes with bamboo garden – Dynamic, unrealistic sequence of interior space.

As “The architectural nature”, floating white polyhedral masses that have the built-in bamboo gardens, produced the various stories of vertical space

Landscape architecture – Harmonizing with the surrounding landscape

The shape of the mountain type composed of irregular polygonal shaped concrete mass and metal mesh was designed to harmonize with the context as “the architectural mountain”.

There was the intention to be a part of the surrounding context that consisted of the river and the mountain.

Architectural Island – Island House

As a result, this house was to be “The island house” as an “architectural island”.

: site plan

: basement floor plan

: first floor plan

: second floor plan

: roof plan

: front elevation

: rear elevation

: left side elevation

: right side elevation

: section 01

: section 02

: section 03

Cite:
Saieh , Nico . "Island House / IROJE KHM Architects" 06 Oct 2009. ArchDaily. Accessed 08 Feb 2012. <http://www.archdaily.com/37021>

Comments (30)
Tweets (12)
Links to this entry (5)

Myungjin says:

i like the concept but the house on overall kinda misses neatness of form.

# October 6, 2009 at 13:23

mike says:

Yeah it’s got quite a “busy” touch to it, nevertheless a very cool project! I like how it respectfully tries to imitate the landscape.

# October 6, 2009 at 13:43

cad says:

no rhyme or reason

# October 6, 2009 at 14:32

Tom W says:

What a mess.

# October 6, 2009 at 14:45

Kevin says:

I can only agree with cad and Tom W.

# October 6, 2009 at 15:03

Jeison says:

Huge impact. Nice? can´t answer…

# October 6, 2009 at 15:06

WiBu says:

I can’t comment on the functionality of it but as far as being a striking piece of architecture it works.

# October 6, 2009 at 16:10

Stephen says:

Seems to me like Charles Moore meets SuperDutch. I can “appreciate” the building, but I think it would have been stronger there were fewer grammatical parts.

# October 6, 2009 at 17:39

mnn says:

MONEY !!!

# October 6, 2009 at 18:33

Sissie says:

neither comfortable nor nice

# October 6, 2009 at 19:05

christopher says:

this house is already on Kanye West’s blog…whatever that means, i leave to you

# October 6, 2009 at 20:03

Stone says:

I like the view that water behind of the desk.It is the maximum efficiency landuse.

# October 6, 2009 at 20:49

S says:

How surprised!

# October 6, 2009 at 21:00

Rasha says:

I actually like its complexity. I love the Long Section! The site calls for a linear building like that so that all the rooms get views of the river.

# October 7, 2009 at 00:52

Mac says:

Why would you visit Kanye West’s blog? …whatever the reason, I leave up to you…

# October 7, 2009 at 01:02

Rupesh Jamkhindikar says:

this is amazing…though i think the structure could have been a bit to resolved…tough time for the engineer and fun time for the architect….gr8….

# October 7, 2009 at 01:51

nindya says:

wonderful but bit complicated

# October 7, 2009 at 04:39

harry says:

strange

# October 7, 2009 at 04:40

arnold says:

the first impression when I saw photos was: WOW! But.. everything from the begining:
- the location (views) are excelent: river, mountains..it’s very very nice;
- the house facades are our days arch.decision. But when I’m looking at extrior, it looks like hotel, or entertainment centre, and after all, it maybe could be and a living house;
- in my opinion, the exterior is very discording with surrounding, to much screaming.. There’s no harmony with nature. I understand, what architects wanted to underline, accentuate the modern, new arch.form (“hill”) with all surrounding. But it’s too much, in same case, nasty sceaming arch.decision.
- the plans are realy interesting. Good work. But interior structure and materials… well, I’ll never said, that this house built a millionaire. Especialy these decoration boarding (planking) looks like cheap plastic. There are more in some case “cheap” arch.interior solutions, but it’s only my opinion.

This house is too much egoistics with all his “neighbourhood”. Especialy I regret about very nice River and beautifull Mountains.

# October 7, 2009 at 06:19

AMR says:

What a waste of beautiful dining chairs….and a beautiful site…………

A nuclear power station would have less visual impact…..

# October 7, 2009 at 07:59

Goldschmidt R says:

Hmm, I think that AMR is right saing that a nuclear power station would have less visual impact. And my words are: It is a complet garbage, because it has no head or tail, it has no rithm or contrast and it has no reason.

# October 7, 2009 at 08:23

s says:

It might be said that there is not a head or a tail because the process is like a Mobius strip through the site and nature. If you see the plan and the doors to the roof garden, this interact between inner space and outer space.

# October 11, 2009 at 13:43

z99 says:

it looks like it would be a pretty comfortable place to be in… the view surely helps

# October 7, 2009 at 08:43

darth says:

kinda obese, very overcrowded, it has too much of everything… the site is amazing but its not an elegant solution.

# October 7, 2009 at 10:46

sum says:

the shape of the roof is not going with nature, not convincing at all, even in the images u can notice disturbance..
though, it has nice interiors

# October 7, 2009 at 15:09

alejandro says:

Full of good intentions, perhaps too many most of them not well resolved.

# October 7, 2009 at 16:35

oscar falcón lara says:

A very cool project, angles everywhere and so many nice views, architecturally speaking, the roof garden idea is so good and the interior is interesting and the displacement of the floor plan seems organic (although it’s not but only seems that way), it’s a pretty awesome site.

# October 7, 2009 at 16:46

corto says:

respect… a sincere effort…

# October 8, 2009 at 02:07

Mark says:

Love IT! It is complicated, but that is not always a bad thing – Architecture does not have to be simplistic to be good. Complicated architecture does not have to be bad. (Although apparently complicated architecture doesn’t get such good grades!)

# November 23, 2009 at 00:13

shatha says:

Alooooooot of sharp edges .In my option if you want your building to integrate with nature, the building should have a lighter structure, smooth edges, dissolve at the ends, at places where the building meets the sea, u could have a less steep slope so people could enjoy sitting there rather lifting the hole building on a platform ….
It is not necessary to have the roof like the mountains pick to represent nature.

# November 23, 2009 at 02:36

12:32 AM Oct 18th

Rafael Cataldo

http://bit.ly/S9kLl Shide FC Stadium para as olimpíadas de inverno.

7:29 AM Oct 22nd

leporello

"Island House / IROJE KHM Architects | ArchDaily" (http://twitthis.com/j5mrnz)

8:23 AM Oct 29th

miguelarchi

Island House / IROJE KHM Architects http://bit.ly/S9kLl http://www.eva-atelier.net

6:36 PM Nov 9th

MIGUEL ROJAS SOLANO